Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Current Opinion

Managing Transplant Rejection in the Elderly: The Benefits of Less Aggressive Immunosuppressive Regimens

Authors: Kristian Heldal, Karsten Midtvedt

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Organ transplantation is increasingly common in the older population, particularly among end-stage renal disease patients. The outcomes of transplantation are often inferior in older people compared with younger recipients, partly because of the side effects of immunosuppressive medication used after organ transplantation. In this paper, we explore treatment considerations for older transplant patients. The current commonly used immunosuppressive protocols have not been validated sufficiently in older organ recipients. The primary objective for the management of transplant recipients of all ages is to prevent rejection without increasing the risk of infection or other long-term complications. To avoid serious side effects related to immunosuppressive treatment, the clinician should consider modifying and tailoring the long-term regimen for individual patients. Modifications for older recipients include reduction in the dosage or avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors, with or without the introduction of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and discontinuing the use of corticosteroids. Such modifications must consider the individual risks and needs of each recipient. Treatment of an acute rejection episode should follow the same protocol as for younger recipients, but special attention is needed to ensure reduction in the total immunosuppressive load. One way to achieve this is to avoid anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and to use on-demand ATG treatment of rejection on the basis of the patient’s CD3 T cell count.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, et al. The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol. 2003;60(5):352–60.PubMed Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, et al. The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol. 2003;60(5):352–60.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kurella M, Covinsky KE, Collins AJ, et al. Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(3):177–83.PubMedCrossRef Kurella M, Covinsky KE, Collins AJ, et al. Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(3):177–83.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Macrae J, Friedman AL, Friedman EA, Eggers P. Live and deceased donor kidney transplantation in patients aged 75 years and older in the United States. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(3):641–8.PubMedCrossRef Macrae J, Friedman AL, Friedman EA, Eggers P. Live and deceased donor kidney transplantation in patients aged 75 years and older in the United States. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(3):641–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Port FK, Merion RM, Roys EC, Wolfe RA. Trends in organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transpl. 2008;8(4 Pt 2):911–21. Port FK, Merion RM, Roys EC, Wolfe RA. Trends in organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transpl. 2008;8(4 Pt 2):911–21.
5.
go back to reference Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, et al. Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 1993;270(11):1339–43.PubMedCrossRef Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, et al. Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 1993;270(11):1339–43.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30.PubMedCrossRef Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(23):1725–30.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heldal K, Hartmann A, Grootendorst DC, et al. Benefit of kidney transplantation beyond 70 years of age. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25(5):1680–7.CrossRef Heldal K, Hartmann A, Grootendorst DC, et al. Benefit of kidney transplantation beyond 70 years of age. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2010;25(5):1680–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, et al. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2007;83(8):1069–74.PubMedCrossRef Rao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, et al. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2007;83(8):1069–74.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heldal K, Leivestad T, Hartmann A, et al. Kidney transplantation in the elderly—the Norwegian experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(3):1026–31.PubMedCrossRef Heldal K, Leivestad T, Hartmann A, et al. Kidney transplantation in the elderly—the Norwegian experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(3):1026–31.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference McKay D, Jameson J. Kidney transplantation and the ageing immune system. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:700–8.PubMedCrossRef McKay D, Jameson J. Kidney transplantation and the ageing immune system. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:700–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo A, Hanson J, et al. Increased immunosuppressive vulnerability in elderly renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2000;69(5):885–9.PubMedCrossRef Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo A, Hanson J, et al. Increased immunosuppressive vulnerability in elderly renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2000;69(5):885–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tullius SG, Milford E. Kidney allocation and the aging immune response. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1369–70.PubMedCrossRef Tullius SG, Milford E. Kidney allocation and the aging immune response. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1369–70.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Huang E, Segev DL, Rabb H. Kidney transplantation in the elderly. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29(6):621–35.PubMedCrossRef Huang E, Segev DL, Rabb H. Kidney transplantation in the elderly. Semin Nephrol. 2009;29(6):621–35.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Badowski M, Gurk-Turner C, Cangro C, et al. The impact of reduced immunosuppression on graft outcomes in elderly renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2009;23(6):930–7.PubMedCrossRef Badowski M, Gurk-Turner C, Cangro C, et al. The impact of reduced immunosuppression on graft outcomes in elderly renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2009;23(6):930–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T, et al. Clinical outcomes in elderly kidney transplant recipients are related to acute rejection episodes rather than pretransplant comorbidity. Transplantation. 2009;87(7):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T, et al. Clinical outcomes in elderly kidney transplant recipients are related to acute rejection episodes rather than pretransplant comorbidity. Transplantation. 2009;87(7):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Meier-Kriesche HU, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Interaction between acute rejection and recipient age on long-term renal allograft survival. Transplant Proc. 2001;33(7–8):3425–6.PubMedCrossRef Meier-Kriesche HU, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Interaction between acute rejection and recipient age on long-term renal allograft survival. Transplant Proc. 2001;33(7–8):3425–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II, et al. Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(7):1538–46.PubMed de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II, et al. Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(7):1538–46.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Oberhuber R, Ge X, Tullius SG. Donor age-specific injury and immune responses. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(1):38–42.PubMedCrossRef Oberhuber R, Ge X, Tullius SG. Donor age-specific injury and immune responses. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(1):38–42.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pratschke J, Merk V, Reutzel-Selke A, et al. Potent early immune response after kidney transplantation in patients of the European senior transplant program. Transplantation. 2009;87(7):992–1000.PubMedCrossRef Pratschke J, Merk V, Reutzel-Selke A, et al. Potent early immune response after kidney transplantation in patients of the European senior transplant program. Transplantation. 2009;87(7):992–1000.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cerreta F, Eichler HG, Rasi G. Drug policy for an aging population—the European Medicines Agency’s geriatric medicines strategy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1972–4.PubMedCrossRef Cerreta F, Eichler HG, Rasi G. Drug policy for an aging population—the European Medicines Agency’s geriatric medicines strategy. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1972–4.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Blosser CD, Huverserian A, Bloom RD, et al. Age, exclusion criteria, and generalizability of randomized trials enrolling kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;91(8):858–63.PubMedCrossRef Blosser CD, Huverserian A, Bloom RD, et al. Age, exclusion criteria, and generalizability of randomized trials enrolling kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;91(8):858–63.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gill J, Sampaio M, Gill JS, et al. Induction immunosuppressive therapy in the elderly kidney transplant recipient in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(5):1168–78.PubMedCrossRef Gill J, Sampaio M, Gill JS, et al. Induction immunosuppressive therapy in the elderly kidney transplant recipient in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(5):1168–78.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Calne RY. Cyclosporin in cadaveric renal transplantation: 5-year follow-up of a multicentre trial. Lancet. 1987;2(8557):506–7.PubMedCrossRef Calne RY. Cyclosporin in cadaveric renal transplantation: 5-year follow-up of a multicentre trial. Lancet. 1987;2(8557):506–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fung JJ, Abu-Elmagd K, Todo S, et al. Overview of FK506 in transplantation. Clin Transplant. 1990;115–21. Fung JJ, Abu-Elmagd K, Todo S, et al. Overview of FK506 in transplantation. Clin Transplant. 1990;115–21.
26.
go back to reference Starzl TE, Todo S, Fung J, et al. FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Lancet. 1989;2(8670):1000–4.PubMedCrossRef Starzl TE, Todo S, Fung J, et al. FK 506 for liver, kidney, and pancreas transplantation. Lancet. 1989;2(8670):1000–4.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2562–75.PubMedCrossRef Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2562–75.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Margreiter R. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in renal transplantation: a randomised multicentre study. Lancet. 2002;359(9308):741–6.PubMedCrossRef Margreiter R. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in renal transplantation: a randomised multicentre study. Lancet. 2002;359(9308):741–6.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vincenti F, Friman S, Scheuermann E, et al. Results of an international, randomized trial comparing glucose metabolism disorders and outcome with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(6):1506–14.PubMedCrossRef Vincenti F, Friman S, Scheuermann E, et al. Results of an international, randomized trial comparing glucose metabolism disorders and outcome with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(6):1506–14.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Revanur VK, Jardine AG, Kingsmore DB, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on patient and graft survival in recipients of kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2001;15(2):89–94.PubMedCrossRef Revanur VK, Jardine AG, Kingsmore DB, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on patient and graft survival in recipients of kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2001;15(2):89–94.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Valderhaug TG, Hjelmesaeth J, Jenssen T, et al. Early posttransplantation hyperglycemia in kidney transplant recipients is associated with overall long-term graft losses. Transplantation. 2012;94(7):714–20.PubMedCrossRef Valderhaug TG, Hjelmesaeth J, Jenssen T, et al. Early posttransplantation hyperglycemia in kidney transplant recipients is associated with overall long-term graft losses. Transplantation. 2012;94(7):714–20.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Merrill JP, Murray JE, Takacs FJ, et al. Successful transplantation of kidney from a human cadaver. JAMA. 1963;185:347–53.PubMedCrossRef Merrill JP, Murray JE, Takacs FJ, et al. Successful transplantation of kidney from a human cadaver. JAMA. 1963;185:347–53.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH, et al. Prolonged survival of human-kidney homografts by immunosuppressive drug therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12(1):70–83.PubMedCrossRef Murray JE, Merrill JP, Harrison JH, et al. Prolonged survival of human-kidney homografts by immunosuppressive drug therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12(1):70–83.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. Lancet. 1995;345(8961):1321–5. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group. Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. Lancet. 1995;345(8961):1321–5.
35.
go back to reference The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1996;61(7):1029–37. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1996;61(7):1029–37.
36.
go back to reference Sollinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. US Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation. 1995;60(3):225–32.PubMedCrossRef Sollinger HW. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. US Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group. Transplantation. 1995;60(3):225–32.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Clayton PA, McDonald SP, Chapman JR, et al. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine for kidney transplantation: a 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Transplantation. 2012;94(2):152–8.PubMedCrossRef Clayton PA, McDonald SP, Chapman JR, et al. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine for kidney transplantation: a 15-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Transplantation. 2012;94(2):152–8.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Mourer JS, Hartigh J, van Zwet EW, et al. Randomized trial comparing late concentration-controlled calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal. Transplantation. 2012;93(9):887–94.PubMedCrossRef Mourer JS, Hartigh J, van Zwet EW, et al. Randomized trial comparing late concentration-controlled calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal. Transplantation. 2012;93(9):887–94.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, et al. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008;86(8):1043–51.PubMedCrossRef van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, et al. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation. 2008;86(8):1043–51.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Arns W, Citterio F, Campistol JM. ‘Old-for-old’—new strategies for renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(2):336–41.PubMedCrossRef Arns W, Citterio F, Campistol JM. ‘Old-for-old’—new strategies for renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(2):336–41.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Oyen O, Strom EH, Midtvedt K, et al. Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with thrombotic microangiopathy/hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):412–8.PubMedCrossRef Oyen O, Strom EH, Midtvedt K, et al. Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with thrombotic microangiopathy/hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(2):412–8.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Budde K, Lehner F, Sommerer C, et al. Conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant: 3-year results from the randomized ZEUS study. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(6):1528–40.PubMedCrossRef Budde K, Lehner F, Sommerer C, et al. Conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant: 3-year results from the randomized ZEUS study. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(6):1528–40.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Holdaas H, Rostaing L, Seron D, et al. Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: a randomized, multicenter, 24-month study. Transplantation. 2011;92(4):410–8.PubMedCrossRef Holdaas H, Rostaing L, Seron D, et al. Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: a randomized, multicenter, 24-month study. Transplantation. 2011;92(4):410–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Mjornstedt L, Sorensen SS, von Zur MB, et al. Improved renal function after early conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus: a randomized trial in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(10):2744–53.PubMedCrossRef Mjornstedt L, Sorensen SS, von Zur MB, et al. Improved renal function after early conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus: a randomized trial in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(10):2744–53.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Snanoudj R, Zuber J, Legendre C. Co-stimulation blockade as a new strategy in kidney transplantation: benefits and limits. Drugs. 2010;70(16):2121–31.PubMedCrossRef Snanoudj R, Zuber J, Legendre C. Co-stimulation blockade as a new strategy in kidney transplantation: benefits and limits. Drugs. 2010;70(16):2121–31.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Durrbach A, Pestana JM, Pearson T, et al. A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study). Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):547–57.PubMedCrossRef Durrbach A, Pestana JM, Pearson T, et al. A phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in kidney transplants from extended criteria donors (BENEFIT-EXT study). Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):547–57.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Vincenti F, Charpentier B, Vanrenterghem Y, et al. A phase III study of belatacept-based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):535–46.PubMedCrossRef Vincenti F, Charpentier B, Vanrenterghem Y, et al. A phase III study of belatacept-based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):535–46.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia VD, et al. Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(2):430–9.PubMedCrossRef Rostaing L, Massari P, Garcia VD, et al. Switching from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to a belatacept-based regimen in renal transplant recipients: a randomized phase II study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(2):430–9.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Bock HA, Gallati H, Zurcher RM, et al. A randomized prospective trial of prophylactic immunosuppression with ATG-fresenius versus OKT3 after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;59(6):830–40.PubMed Bock HA, Gallati H, Zurcher RM, et al. A randomized prospective trial of prophylactic immunosuppression with ATG-fresenius versus OKT3 after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;59(6):830–40.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Agha IA, Rueda J, Alvarez A, et al. Short course induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin for renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2002;73(3):473–5.PubMedCrossRef Agha IA, Rueda J, Alvarez A, et al. Short course induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin for renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2002;73(3):473–5.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Goggins WC, Pascual MA, Powelson JA, et al. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial of intraoperative versus postoperative Thymoglobulin in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003;76(5):798–802.PubMedCrossRef Goggins WC, Pascual MA, Powelson JA, et al. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial of intraoperative versus postoperative Thymoglobulin in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003;76(5):798–802.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Gurk-Turner C, Airee R, Philosophe B, et al. Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2008;85(10):1425–30.PubMedCrossRef Gurk-Turner C, Airee R, Philosophe B, et al. Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2008;85(10):1425–30.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wong W, Agrawal N, Pascual M, et al. Comparison of two dosages of thymoglobulin used as a short-course for induction in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19(8):629–35.PubMedCrossRef Wong W, Agrawal N, Pascual M, et al. Comparison of two dosages of thymoglobulin used as a short-course for induction in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19(8):629–35.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Cibrik DM, Kaplan B, Meier-Kriesche HU. Role of anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation. BioDrugs. 2001;15(10):655–66.PubMedCrossRef Cibrik DM, Kaplan B, Meier-Kriesche HU. Role of anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation. BioDrugs. 2001;15(10):655–66.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Nashan B, Moore R, Amlot P, et al. Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group. Lancet. 1997;350(9086):1193–8.PubMedCrossRef Nashan B, Moore R, Amlot P, et al. Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group. Lancet. 1997;350(9086):1193–8.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, et al. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):1967–77.PubMedCrossRef Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, et al. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(19):1967–77.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Morgan RD, O’Callaghan JM, Knight SR, et al. Alemtuzumab induction therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2012;93(12):1179–88. Morgan RD, O’Callaghan JM, Knight SR, et al. Alemtuzumab induction therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2012;93(12):1179–88.
58.
go back to reference Tyden G, Ekberg H, Tufveson G, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single dose rituximab as induction in renal transplantation: a 3-year follow-up. Transplantation. 2012;94(3):e21–2.PubMedCrossRef Tyden G, Ekberg H, Tufveson G, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single dose rituximab as induction in renal transplantation: a 3-year follow-up. Transplantation. 2012;94(3):e21–2.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference van den Hoogen MW, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB. Anti-T-cell antibodies for the treatment of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12(8):1031–42.PubMedCrossRef van den Hoogen MW, Hoitsma AJ, Hilbrands LB. Anti-T-cell antibodies for the treatment of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12(8):1031–42.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Midtvedt K, Fauchald P, Lien B, et al. Individualized T cell monitored administration of ATG versus OKT3 in steroid-resistant kidney graft rejection. Clin Transplant. 2003;17(1):69–74.PubMedCrossRef Midtvedt K, Fauchald P, Lien B, et al. Individualized T cell monitored administration of ATG versus OKT3 in steroid-resistant kidney graft rejection. Clin Transplant. 2003;17(1):69–74.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Machado S, Figueiredo N, Neves M, et al. Kidney transplantation using donors over 70 years old: are the criteria for organ allocation too expanded? Transplant Proc. 2012;44(8):2289–92.PubMedCrossRef Machado S, Figueiredo N, Neves M, et al. Kidney transplantation using donors over 70 years old: are the criteria for organ allocation too expanded? Transplant Proc. 2012;44(8):2289–92.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Falck P, Asberg A, Byberg KT, et al. Reduced elimination of cyclosporine A in elderly (>65 years) kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2008;86(10):1379–83.PubMedCrossRef Falck P, Asberg A, Byberg KT, et al. Reduced elimination of cyclosporine A in elderly (>65 years) kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2008;86(10):1379–83.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Jacobson PA, Schladt D, Oetting WS, et al. Lower calcineurin inhibitor doses in older compared to younger kidney transplant recipients yield similar troughs. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(12):3326–36.PubMedCrossRef Jacobson PA, Schladt D, Oetting WS, et al. Lower calcineurin inhibitor doses in older compared to younger kidney transplant recipients yield similar troughs. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(12):3326–36.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Ekberg H, Johansson ME. Challenges and considerations in diagnosing the kidney disease in deteriorating graft function. Transpl Int. 2012;25(11):1119–28.PubMedCrossRef Ekberg H, Johansson ME. Challenges and considerations in diagnosing the kidney disease in deteriorating graft function. Transpl Int. 2012;25(11):1119–28.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Nankivell BJ, Kuypers DR. Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1428–37.PubMedCrossRef Nankivell BJ, Kuypers DR. Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1428–37.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Johnson DW, Nicol DL, Purdie DM, et al. Is mycophenolate mofetil less safe than azathioprine in elderly renal transplant recipients? Transplantation. 2002;73(7):1158–63.PubMedCrossRef Johnson DW, Nicol DL, Purdie DM, et al. Is mycophenolate mofetil less safe than azathioprine in elderly renal transplant recipients? Transplantation. 2002;73(7):1158–63.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Meier-Kriesche HU, Morris JA, Chu AH, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in a large population of elderly renal transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(11):2864–9.PubMedCrossRef Meier-Kriesche HU, Morris JA, Chu AH, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in a large population of elderly renal transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(11):2864–9.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Giessing M, Fuller TF, Tuellmann M, et al. Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments. World J Urol. 2007;25(3):325–32.PubMedCrossRef Giessing M, Fuller TF, Tuellmann M, et al. Steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and future developments. World J Urol. 2007;25(3):325–32.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Woodle ES, First MR, Pirsch J, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing early (7 day) corticosteroid cessation versus long-term, low-dose corticosteroid therapy. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):564–77.PubMed Woodle ES, First MR, Pirsch J, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing early (7 day) corticosteroid cessation versus long-term, low-dose corticosteroid therapy. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):564–77.PubMed
70.
go back to reference Steiner RW. Steroid-free chronic immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(6):567–73.PubMedCrossRef Steiner RW. Steroid-free chronic immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(6):567–73.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Webster AC, Ruster LP, McGee R, et al. Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD003897. Webster AC, Ruster LP, McGee R, et al. Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD003897.
72.
go back to reference Holdaas H, Midtvedt K, Asberg A. A drug safety evaluation of everolimus in kidney transplantation. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11(6):1013–22.PubMedCrossRef Holdaas H, Midtvedt K, Asberg A. A drug safety evaluation of everolimus in kidney transplantation. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11(6):1013–22.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T, et al. Risk variables associated with the outcome of kidney recipients >70 years of age in the new millennium. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(8):2706–11.PubMedCrossRef Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T, et al. Risk variables associated with the outcome of kidney recipients >70 years of age in the new millennium. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(8):2706–11.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Deeks ED, Keating GM. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of acute renal allograft rejection. Drugs. 2009;69(11):1483–512.PubMedCrossRef Deeks ED, Keating GM. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of acute renal allograft rejection. Drugs. 2009;69(11):1483–512.PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Patel SJ, Knight RJ, Suki WN, et al. Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(3):E250–6.PubMedCrossRef Patel SJ, Knight RJ, Suki WN, et al. Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(3):E250–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Managing Transplant Rejection in the Elderly: The Benefits of Less Aggressive Immunosuppressive Regimens
Authors
Kristian Heldal
Karsten Midtvedt
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing AG
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0082-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Drugs & Aging 7/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.