Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 10/2019

Open Access 01-10-2019 | Short Communication

Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety

Authors: Ann Blandford, Patricia C. Dykes, Bryony Dean Franklin, Dominic Furniss, Galal H. Galal-Edeen, Kumiko O. Schnock, David W. Bates

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Intravenous medication administration is widely reported to be error prone. Technologies such as smart pumps have been introduced with a view to reducing these errors. An international comparison could provide evidence of their effectiveness, including consideration of contextual factors such as regulatory systems and local cultures.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate similarities and differences in practices and error types involving intravenous medication administration in the United States and England, and summarise methodological differences necessary to perform these parallel studies.

Methods

We drew on findings of separate point prevalence studies conducted across hospitals in each country. In these, we compared what was being administered at the time of observation with the prescription and relevant policies, errors were classified by type and severity, and proportions of infusions featuring each error type were calculated. We also reviewed what adaptations to the US protocol were needed for England. Authors independently reviewed findings from both studies and proposed themes for comparison. In online meetings, each country’s research team clarified assumptions and explained their findings.

Results

Key themes included commonalities and contrasts in methods, findings, practices and policies. Although US sites made greater use of smart infusion devices, and had more precisely defined requirements around infusion device use, patterns of errors were similar. Differences among clinical contexts within each country were as marked as differences across countries. Regulatory and quality control systems shape practices, but causal relationships are complex.

Conclusion

Infusion administration is a complex adaptive system with multiple interacting agents (professionals, patients, software systems, etc.) that respond in rich ways to their environments; safety depends on complex, interrelated factors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Logan MK, Benjamin BE, Blake N, Chapman RC, Neder M, Plohal A, et al. A roundtable discussion: working toward safer, easier-to-use infusion systems. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2015;1(49):6–12. Logan MK, Benjamin BE, Blake N, Chapman RC, Neder M, Plohal A, et al. A roundtable discussion: working toward safer, easier-to-use infusion systems. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2015;1(49):6–12.
2.
go back to reference Murdoch LJ, Cameron VL. Smart infusion technology: a minimum safety standard for intensive care? Br J Nurs. 2008;17(10):630–6.CrossRefPubMed Murdoch LJ, Cameron VL. Smart infusion technology: a minimum safety standard for intensive care? Br J Nurs. 2008;17(10):630–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wilson K, Sullivan M. Preventing medication errors with smart infusion technology. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(2):177–83.CrossRefPubMed Wilson K, Sullivan M. Preventing medication errors with smart infusion technology. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(2):177–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Forni A, Chu HT, Fanikos J. Technology utilization to prevent medication errors. Curr Drug Saf. 2010;5(1):13–8.CrossRefPubMed Forni A, Chu HT, Fanikos J. Technology utilization to prevent medication errors. Curr Drug Saf. 2010;5(1):13–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(2):237–56.CrossRefPubMed Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, Ashcroft DM. Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(2):237–56.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hertzel C, Sousa VD. The use of smart pumps for preventing medication errors. J Infus Nurs. 2009;32(5):257–67.CrossRefPubMed Hertzel C, Sousa VD. The use of smart pumps for preventing medication errors. J Infus Nurs. 2009;32(5):257–67.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ohashi K, Dalleur O, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2014;37(12):1011–20.CrossRefPubMed Ohashi K, Dalleur O, Dykes PC, Bates DW. Benefits and risks of using smart pumps to reduce medication error rates: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2014;37(12):1011–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Keohane CA, Hayes J, Saniuk C, Rothschild JM, Bates DW. Intravenous medication safety and smart infusion systems: lessons learned and future opportunities. J Infus Nurs. 2005;28(5):321–8.CrossRefPubMed Keohane CA, Hayes J, Saniuk C, Rothschild JM, Bates DW. Intravenous medication safety and smart infusion systems: lessons learned and future opportunities. J Infus Nurs. 2005;28(5):321–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Cameron C, Carroll DL, et al. A multi-hospital before-after observational study using a point-prevalence approach with an infusion safety intervention bundle to reduce intravenous medication administration errors. Drug Saf. 2018;41(6):591–602.CrossRefPubMed Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Cameron C, Carroll DL, et al. A multi-hospital before-after observational study using a point-prevalence approach with an infusion safety intervention bundle to reduce intravenous medication administration errors. Drug Saf. 2018;41(6):591–602.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Husch M, Sullivan C, Rooney D, Barnard C, Fotis M, Clarke J, Noskin G. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. BMJ Qual Saf. 2005;14(2):80–6.CrossRef Husch M, Sullivan C, Rooney D, Barnard C, Fotis M, Clarke J, Noskin G. Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology. BMJ Qual Saf. 2005;14(2):80–6.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Call R, Cameron C, et al. The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(2):131–40.CrossRefPubMed Schnock KO, Dykes PC, Albert J, Ariosto D, Call R, Cameron C, et al. The frequency of intravenous medication administration errors related to smart infusion pumps: a multihospital observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(2):131–40.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cousins DH, Sabatier B, Begue D, Schmitt C, Hoppe-Tichy T. Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and France. BMJ Qual Saf. 2005;14(3):190–5.CrossRef Cousins DH, Sabatier B, Begue D, Schmitt C, Hoppe-Tichy T. Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and France. BMJ Qual Saf. 2005;14(3):190–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wirtz V, Barber ND. An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25(3):104–11.CrossRefPubMed Wirtz V, Barber ND. An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25(3):104–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dean BS, Allan EL, Barber ND, Barker KN. Comparison of medication errors in an American and a British hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52(22):2543–9.CrossRefPubMed Dean BS, Allan EL, Barber ND, Barker KN. Comparison of medication errors in an American and a British hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995;52(22):2543–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: prescribing and transcribing—2013. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(11):924–42.CrossRefPubMed Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: prescribing and transcribing—2013. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(11):924–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Iacovides I, Blandford A, Cox A, Franklin BD, Lee P, Vincent CJ. Infusion device standardisation and dose error reduction software. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(Sup14):S16–24.CrossRefPubMed Iacovides I, Blandford A, Cox A, Franklin BD, Lee P, Vincent CJ. Infusion device standardisation and dose error reduction software. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(Sup14):S16–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Blandford A, Furniss D, Lyons I, Chumbley G, Iacovides I, Wei L, et al. Exploring the current landscape of intravenous infusion practices and errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blandford A, Furniss D, Lyons I, Chumbley G, Iacovides I, Wei L, et al. Exploring the current landscape of intravenous infusion practices and errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hartwig SC, Denger SD, Schneider PJ. Severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48(12):2611–6.PubMed Hartwig SC, Denger SD, Schneider PJ. Severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991;48(12):2611–6.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Furniss D, Lyons I, Franklin BD, Mayer A, Chumbley G, Wei L, et al. Procedural and documentation variations in intravenous infusion administration: a mixed methods study of policy and practice across 16 hospital trusts in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Furniss D, Lyons I, Franklin BD, Mayer A, Chumbley G, Wei L, et al. Procedural and documentation variations in intravenous infusion administration: a mixed methods study of policy and practice across 16 hospital trusts in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Armstrong S. Hospitals that are leading the way to a digital future. BMJ. 2017;22(356):j1366.CrossRef Armstrong S. Hospitals that are leading the way to a digital future. BMJ. 2017;22(356):j1366.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bates DW, Vanderveen TW, Seger DL, Yamaga C, Rothschild JM. Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(4):203–10.CrossRefPubMed Bates DW, Vanderveen TW, Seger DL, Yamaga C, Rothschild JM. Variability in intravenous medication practices: implications for medication safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(4):203–10.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Carpenter JD, Gorman PN. What’s so special about medications: a pharmacist’s observations from the POE study. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 2001 (p. 95). American Medical Informatics Association. Carpenter JD, Gorman PN. What’s so special about medications: a pharmacist’s observations from the POE study. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 2001 (p. 95). American Medical Informatics Association.
31.
go back to reference Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A, Ampt A, Creswick N, Coiera E, Iedema R. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(6):746–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgiou A, Ampt A, Creswick N, Coiera E, Iedema R. Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(6):746–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of Medicare look like? Romanow Pap. 2002;2:21–53. Glouberman S, Zimmerman B. Complicated and complex systems: what would successful reform of Medicare look like? Romanow Pap. 2002;2:21–53.
33.
go back to reference Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Long J, Clay-Williams R, Damen N, et al. Complexity science in healthcare-aspirations, approaches, applications and accomplishments: a white paper. Macquarie Park: Macquarie University; 2017. Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Ellis LA, Long J, Clay-Williams R, Damen N, et al. Complexity science in healthcare-aspirations, approaches, applications and accomplishments: a white paper. Macquarie Park: Macquarie University; 2017.
34.
go back to reference Van Beurden EK, Kia AM, Zask A, Dietrich U, Rose L. Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice. Health Promotion Int. 2011;28(1):73–83.CrossRef Van Beurden EK, Kia AM, Zask A, Dietrich U, Rose L. Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice. Health Promotion Int. 2011;28(1):73–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intravenous Infusion Administration: A Comparative Study of Practices and Errors Between the United States and England and Their Implications for Patient Safety
Authors
Ann Blandford
Patricia C. Dykes
Bryony Dean Franklin
Dominic Furniss
Galal H. Galal-Edeen
Kumiko O. Schnock
David W. Bates
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00841-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Drug Safety 10/2019 Go to the issue