Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CNS Drugs 4/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Migraine | Original Research Article

DFN-02, Sumatriptan 10 mg Nasal Spray with Permeation Enhancer, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Functional Disability and Subject Satisfaction with Treatment

Authors: Richard B. Lipton, Sagar Munjal, Elimor Brand-Schieber, Alan M. Rapoport

Published in: CNS Drugs | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The commercial formulation of sumatriptan nasal spray is an effective option for migraine patients requiring or preferring a non-oral route of drug administration, but its utility is limited by poor absorption and tolerability issues. DFN-02, a new formulation of sumatriptan 10 mg nasal spray, is co-formulated with a permeation enhancer that gives it pharmacokinetics comparable to subcutaneous sumatriptan. As reported previously, DFN-02 was significantly better than placebo on multiple efficacy endpoints at 2 h postdose, including pain freedom, absence of the most bothersome symptom, and pain relief, and its safety and tolerability profiles were excellent.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of acute treatment of migraine with DFN-02, including its effect on migraine-related functional disability and patient satisfaction with treatment.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study of DFN-02 in adults with episodic migraine. Functional disability and subject satisfaction with treatment were prespecified endpoints, assessed in real-time by subjects, using an electronic diary.

Results

In total, 107 subjects were randomized. DFN-02 was significantly superior to placebo for the reduction in functional disability score from predose level at 2 h after treatment (− 1.2 vs. − 0.6, p < 0.001). Subjects treated with DFN-02 were also more likely to be satisfied or very satisfied than subjects treated with placebo at 2 h postdose (70.0% vs. 44.2%, p = 0.027). Using the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire-Revised at 24 h postdose, DFN-02 mean scores were significantly superior to placebo for the subscales of efficacy (65.2 vs. 42.5, p = 0.016) and function (68.9 vs. 42.1, p = 0.001), and for total score (71.0 vs. 56.6, p = 0.016); global medication effectiveness (p = 0.027); and overall satisfaction (p = 0.019). Placebo was significantly better than DFN-02 on the tolerability subscale (94.8 vs. 88.5, p = 0.026). At 24 h postdose, subjects reported significantly higher satisfaction with DFN-02 compared with satisfaction reported pre-randomization regarding their usual migraine medication (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

DFN-02 was superior to placebo for the relief of migraine-related functional disability, and provided greater satisfaction than placebo or subjects’ usual acute treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856802.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holmes WF, MacGregor EA, Sawyer JP, Lipton RB. Information about migraine disability influences physicians’ perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache. 2001;41(4):343–50.CrossRefPubMed Holmes WF, MacGregor EA, Sawyer JP, Lipton RB. Information about migraine disability influences physicians’ perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache. 2001;41(4):343–50.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Hahn SR, Cady RK, Brandes JL, Simons SE, Bain PA, et al. In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1145–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lipton RB, Hahn SR, Cady RK, Brandes JL, Simons SE, Bain PA, et al. In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1145–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Buse DC, Gillard P, Arctander K, Kuang AW, Lipton RB. Assessing physician-patient dialogues about chronic migraine during routine office visits. Headache. 2018;58(7):993–1006.CrossRefPubMed Buse DC, Gillard P, Arctander K, Kuang AW, Lipton RB. Assessing physician-patient dialogues about chronic migraine during routine office visits. Headache. 2018;58(7):993–1006.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, Dahlof C, D’Amico D, Diener HC, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(1):6–38. Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, Dahlof C, D’Amico D, Diener HC, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(1):6–38.
5.
go back to reference Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(6):754–62.CrossRefPubMed Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55(6):754–62.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache. 2002;42(Suppl 1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache. 2002;42(Suppl 1):3–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference MacGregor EA, Brandes J, Eikermann A. Migraine prevalence and treatment patterns: the global Migraine and Zolmitriptan Evaluation survey. Headache. 2003;43(1):19–26.CrossRefPubMed MacGregor EA, Brandes J, Eikermann A. Migraine prevalence and treatment patterns: the global Migraine and Zolmitriptan Evaluation survey. Headache. 2003;43(1):19–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Malik SN, Hopkins M, Young WB, Silberstein SD. Acute migraine treatment: patterns of use and satisfaction in a clinical population. Headache. 2006;46(5):773–80.CrossRefPubMed Malik SN, Hopkins M, Young WB, Silberstein SD. Acute migraine treatment: patterns of use and satisfaction in a clinical population. Headache. 2006;46(5):773–80.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Walling AD, Woolley DC, Molgaard C, Kallail KJ. Patient satisfaction with migraine management by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(6):563–6.CrossRefPubMed Walling AD, Woolley DC, Molgaard C, Kallail KJ. Patient satisfaction with migraine management by family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18(6):563–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group. Treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:316–21.CrossRef The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group. Treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:316–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cady RK, Wendt JK, Kirchner JR, et al. Treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan. JAMA. 1991;265:2831–5.CrossRefPubMed Cady RK, Wendt JK, Kirchner JR, et al. Treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan. JAMA. 1991;265:2831–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lionetto L, Negro A, Casolla B, Simmaco M, Martelletti P. Sumatriptan succinate: pharmacokinetics of different formulations in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(16):2369–80.CrossRefPubMed Lionetto L, Negro A, Casolla B, Simmaco M, Martelletti P. Sumatriptan succinate: pharmacokinetics of different formulations in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(16):2369–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2015;55(1):3–20.CrossRefPubMed Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2015;55(1):3–20.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ryan R, Elkind A, Baker CC, Mullican W, DeBussey S, Asgharnejad M. Sumatriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine. Results of two clinical studies. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1225–30.CrossRefPubMed Ryan R, Elkind A, Baker CC, Mullican W, DeBussey S, Asgharnejad M. Sumatriptan nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine. Results of two clinical studies. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1225–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Diamond S, Elkind A, Jackson RT, Ryan R, DeBussey S, Asgharnejad M. Multiple-attack efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray in the treatment of migraine. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(3):234–40.CrossRefPubMed Diamond S, Elkind A, Jackson RT, Ryan R, DeBussey S, Asgharnejad M. Multiple-attack efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray in the treatment of migraine. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(3):234–40.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (intranasal route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD009663. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (intranasal route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD009663.
19.
go back to reference Munjal S, Gautam A, Offman E, Brand-Schieber E, Allenby K, Fisher DM. A randomized trial comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of DFN-02, an intranasal sumatriptan spray containing a permeation enhancer, with intranasal and subcutaneous sumatriptan in healthy adults. Headache. 2016;56(9):1455–65.CrossRefPubMed Munjal S, Gautam A, Offman E, Brand-Schieber E, Allenby K, Fisher DM. A randomized trial comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of DFN-02, an intranasal sumatriptan spray containing a permeation enhancer, with intranasal and subcutaneous sumatriptan in healthy adults. Headache. 2016;56(9):1455–65.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Allenby K, Spierings ELH, Cady RK, Rapoport AM. A multicenter, open-label, long-term safety and tolerability study of DFN-02, an intranasal spray of sumatriptan 10 mg plus permeation enhancer DDM, for the acute treatment of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Allenby K, Spierings ELH, Cady RK, Rapoport AM. A multicenter, open-label, long-term safety and tolerability study of DFN-02, an intranasal spray of sumatriptan 10 mg plus permeation enhancer DDM, for the acute treatment of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Rapoport AM. DFN-02 (sumatriptan 10 mg with a permeation enhancer) nasal spray vs placebo in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2018;58(5):676–87.CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Rapoport AM. DFN-02 (sumatriptan 10 mg with a permeation enhancer) nasal spray vs placebo in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2018;58(5):676–87.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.CrossRef The International Classification of Headache Disorders. 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1–55. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1–55.
24.
go back to reference Revicki DA, Kimel M, Beusterien K, Kwong JW, Varner JA, Ames MH, et al. Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire: measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment. Headache. 2006;46(2):240–52.CrossRefPubMed Revicki DA, Kimel M, Beusterien K, Kwong JW, Varner JA, Ames MH, et al. Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire: measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment. Headache. 2006;46(2):240–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kimel M, Hsieh R, McCormack J, Burch SP, Revicki DA. Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R): measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment in clinical trials. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(5):510–23.CrossRefPubMed Kimel M, Hsieh R, McCormack J, Burch SP, Revicki DA. Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R): measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment in clinical trials. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(5):510–23.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dahlof CG, Boes-Hansen S, Cederberg CG, Hardebo JE, Henriksson A. How does sumatriptan nasal spray perform in clinical practice? Cephalalgia. 1998;18(5):278–82.CrossRefPubMed Dahlof CG, Boes-Hansen S, Cederberg CG, Hardebo JE, Henriksson A. How does sumatriptan nasal spray perform in clinical practice? Cephalalgia. 1998;18(5):278–82.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Weidmann E, Unger J, Blair S, Friesen C, Hart C, Cady R. An open-label study to assess changes in efficacy and satisfaction with migraine care when patients have access to multiple sumatriptan succinate formulations. Clin Ther. 2003;25(1):235–46.CrossRefPubMed Weidmann E, Unger J, Blair S, Friesen C, Hart C, Cady R. An open-label study to assess changes in efficacy and satisfaction with migraine care when patients have access to multiple sumatriptan succinate formulations. Clin Ther. 2003;25(1):235–46.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Geraud G, Valette C. Sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg: efficacy, tolerance and quality of life in migraine patients [in French]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2000;156(6–7):646–53.PubMed Geraud G, Valette C. Sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg: efficacy, tolerance and quality of life in migraine patients [in French]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2000;156(6–7):646–53.PubMed
Metadata
Title
DFN-02, Sumatriptan 10 mg Nasal Spray with Permeation Enhancer, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Functional Disability and Subject Satisfaction with Treatment
Authors
Richard B. Lipton
Sagar Munjal
Elimor Brand-Schieber
Alan M. Rapoport
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
CNS Drugs / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1172-7047
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1934
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-019-00614-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

CNS Drugs 4/2019 Go to the issue