Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Pharmacokinetics | Original Research Article

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound and Total Teicoplanin in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients

Authors: L. B. S. Aulin, P. De Paepe, E. Dhont, A. de Jaeger, J. Vande Walle, W. Vandenberghe, B. C. McWhinney, J. P. J. Ungerer, J. G. C. van Hasselt, P. A. J. G. De Cock

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Teicoplanin is a highly protein-bound antibiotic, increasingly used to treat serious Gram-positive infections in critically ill children. Maturational and pathophysiological intensive care unit-related changes often lead to altered pharmacokinetics. In this study, the objectives were to develop a pediatric population-pharmacokinetic model of unbound and total teicoplanin concentrations, to investigate the impact of plasma albumin levels and renal function on teicoplanin pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the efficacy of the current weight-based dosing regimen.

Methods

An observational pharmacokinetic study was performed and blood samples were collected for quantification of unbound and total concentrations of teicoplanin after the first dose and in assumed steady-state conditions. A population-pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a standard sequential approach and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for a probability of target attainment analysis using previously published pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic targets.

Results

A two-compartment model with allometric scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters and non-linear plasma protein binding best described the data. Neither the inclusion of albumin nor the renal function significantly improved the model and no other covariates were supported for inclusion in the final model. The probability of target attainment analysis showed that the standard dosing regimen does not satisfactory attain the majority of the proposed targets.

Conclusions

We successfully characterized the pharmacokinetics of unbound and total teicoplanin in critically ill pediatric patients. The highly variable unbound fraction of teicoplanin could not be predicted using albumin levels, which may support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound concentrations. Poor target attainment was shown for the most commonly used dosing regimen, regardless of the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic target evaluated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sidi V, Roilides E, Bibashi E, Gompakis N, Tsakiri A, Koliouskas D. Comparison of efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin in children with antineoplastic therapy-associated febrile neutropenia and Gram-positive bacteremia. J Chemother. 2000;12(4):326–31.CrossRef Sidi V, Roilides E, Bibashi E, Gompakis N, Tsakiri A, Koliouskas D. Comparison of efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin in children with antineoplastic therapy-associated febrile neutropenia and Gram-positive bacteremia. J Chemother. 2000;12(4):326–31.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cavalcanti AB, Goncalves AR, Almeida CS, Bugano DDG, Silva E. Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:6–8. Cavalcanti AB, Goncalves AR, Almeida CS, Bugano DDG, Silva E. Teicoplanin versus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:6–8.
3.
go back to reference Sanofi. Targocid 400mg: summary of product characteristics. 2017. Sanofi. Targocid 400mg: summary of product characteristics. 2017.
4.
go back to reference Ramos-Martín V, Johnson A, McEntee L, Farrington N, Padmore K, Cojutti P, et al. Pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin against MRSA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3382–9.CrossRef Ramos-Martín V, Johnson A, McEntee L, Farrington N, Padmore K, Cojutti P, et al. Pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin against MRSA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3382–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boast A, Gwee A. Teicoplanin: should we be doing routine therapeutic drug monitoring in children? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(11):1110.CrossRef Boast A, Gwee A. Teicoplanin: should we be doing routine therapeutic drug monitoring in children? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(11):1110.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lu H, Rosenbaum S. Developmental pharmacokinetics in pediatric populations. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(4):262–76.PubMedPubMedCentral Lu H, Rosenbaum S. Developmental pharmacokinetics in pediatric populations. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19(4):262–76.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ulldemolins M, Roberts JA, Rello J, Paterson DL, Lipman J. The effects of hypoalbuminaemia on optimizing antibacterial dosing in critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50(2):99–110.CrossRef Ulldemolins M, Roberts JA, Rello J, Paterson DL, Lipman J. The effects of hypoalbuminaemia on optimizing antibacterial dosing in critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50(2):99–110.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dykhuizen RS, Harvey G, Stephenson N, Nathwani D, Gould IM. Protein binding and serum bactericidal activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39(8):1842–7.CrossRef Dykhuizen RS, Harvey G, Stephenson N, Nathwani D, Gould IM. Protein binding and serum bactericidal activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39(8):1842–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Assandri A, Bernareggi A. Binding of teicoplanin to human serum albumin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;33:191–5.CrossRef Assandri A, Bernareggi A. Binding of teicoplanin to human serum albumin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;33:191–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yano R, Nakamura T, Tsukamoto H, Igarashi T, Goto N, Wakiya Y, et al. Variability in teicoplanin protein binding and its prediction using serum albumin concentrations. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29(4):399–403.CrossRef Yano R, Nakamura T, Tsukamoto H, Igarashi T, Goto N, Wakiya Y, et al. Variability in teicoplanin protein binding and its prediction using serum albumin concentrations. Ther Drug Monit. 2007;29(4):399–403.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wilson AP. Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39(3):167–83.CrossRef Wilson AP. Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;39(3):167–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rhodin MM, Anderson BJ, Peters AM, Coulthard MG, Wilkins B, Cole M, et al. Human renal function maturation: a quantitative description using weight and postmenstrual age. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(1):67–766.CrossRef Rhodin MM, Anderson BJ, Peters AM, Coulthard MG, Wilkins B, Cole M, et al. Human renal function maturation: a quantitative description using weight and postmenstrual age. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(1):67–766.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dhont E, Van Der Heggen T, De Jaeger A, Vande Walle J, De Paepe P, De Cock PA. Augmented renal clearance in pediatric intensive care: are we undertreating our sickest patients? Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(1):25–39.CrossRef Dhont E, Van Der Heggen T, De Jaeger A, Vande Walle J, De Paepe P, De Cock PA. Augmented renal clearance in pediatric intensive care: are we undertreating our sickest patients? Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(1):25–39.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference den Bakker E, Gemke RJBJ, Bökenkamp A. Endogenous markers for kidney function in children: a review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(3):163–83.CrossRef den Bakker E, Gemke RJBJ, Bökenkamp A. Endogenous markers for kidney function in children: a review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(3):163–83.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ramos-Martín V, Paulus S, Siner S, Scott E, Padmore K, Newland P, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(11):6920–7.CrossRef Ramos-Martín V, Paulus S, Siner S, Scott E, Padmore K, Newland P, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(11):6920–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zhao W, Zhang D, Storme T, Baruchel A, Declèves X, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in children with malignant haematological disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(5):1197–207.CrossRef Zhao W, Zhang D, Storme T, Baruchel A, Declèves X, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of teicoplanin in children with malignant haematological disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(5):1197–207.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lukas JC, Karikas G, Gazouli M, Kalabalikis P, Hatzis T, Macheras P. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in an ICU population of children and infants. Pharm Res. 2004;21(11):2064–71.CrossRef Lukas JC, Karikas G, Gazouli M, Kalabalikis P, Hatzis T, Macheras P. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in an ICU population of children and infants. Pharm Res. 2004;21(11):2064–71.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kontou A, Sarafidis K, Begou O, Gika HG, Tsiligiannis A, Ogungbenro K, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in preterm and term neonates: is it time for a new dosing regimen? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(4):e01971–e2019.CrossRef Kontou A, Sarafidis K, Begou O, Gika HG, Tsiligiannis A, Ogungbenro K, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in preterm and term neonates: is it time for a new dosing regimen? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(4):e01971–e2019.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Byrne CJ, Parton T, McWhinney B, Fennell JP, O’Byrne P, Deasy E, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound teicoplanin concentrations and dosing simulations in patients with haematological malignancy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;74(4):995–1003.CrossRef Byrne CJ, Parton T, McWhinney B, Fennell JP, O’Byrne P, Deasy E, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound teicoplanin concentrations and dosing simulations in patients with haematological malignancy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;74(4):995–1003.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Xu XS, Dunne A, Kimko H, Nandy P, Vermeulen A. Impact of low percentage of data below the quantification limit on parameter estimates of pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011;38(4):423–32.CrossRef Xu XS, Dunne A, Kimko H, Nandy P, Vermeulen A. Impact of low percentage of data below the quantification limit on parameter estimates of pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011;38(4):423–32.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Goulooze SC, Völler S, Välitalo PAJ, Calvier EAM, Aarons L, Krekels EHJ, et al. The influence of normalization weight in population pharmacokinetic covariate models. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58(1):131–8.CrossRef Goulooze SC, Völler S, Välitalo PAJ, Calvier EAM, Aarons L, Krekels EHJ, et al. The influence of normalization weight in population pharmacokinetic covariate models. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019;58(1):131–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Germovsek E, Barker CIS, Sharland M, Standing JF. Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: all models are wrong, which are useful? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(4):777–90.CrossRef Germovsek E, Barker CIS, Sharland M, Standing JF. Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: all models are wrong, which are useful? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(4):777–90.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference De Cock PAJG, van Dijkman SC, de Jaeger A, Willems J, Carlier M, Verstraete AG, et al. Dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill children. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(7):2002–111.CrossRef De Cock PAJG, van Dijkman SC, de Jaeger A, Willems J, Carlier M, Verstraete AG, et al. Dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill children. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(7):2002–111.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, Moxey-Mims M, Dharnidharka VR, Warady B, et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2012;82(4):445–53.CrossRef Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, Moxey-Mims M, Dharnidharka VR, Warady B, et al. Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2012;82(4):445–53.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pottel H, Delanaye P, Schaeffner E, Dubourg L, Eriksen BO, Melsom T, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate for the full age spectrum from serum creatinine and cystatin C. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):497–507.PubMedPubMedCentral Pottel H, Delanaye P, Schaeffner E, Dubourg L, Eriksen BO, Melsom T, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate for the full age spectrum from serum creatinine and cystatin C. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):497–507.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Chehade H, Cachat F, Jannot AS, Meyrat BJ, Mosig D, Bardy D, et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(1):54–63.CrossRef Chehade H, Cachat F, Jannot AS, Meyrat BJ, Mosig D, Bardy D, et al. New combined serum creatinine and cystatin C quadratic formula for GFR assessment in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(1):54–63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference De Cock RFW, Allegaert K, Brussee JM, Sherwin CMT, Mulla H, De Hoog M, et al. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of gentamicin, tobramycin and vancomycin clearance from neonates to adults: towards a semi-physiological function for maturation in glomerular filtration. Pharm Res. 2014;31(10):2643–54.CrossRef De Cock RFW, Allegaert K, Brussee JM, Sherwin CMT, Mulla H, De Hoog M, et al. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic modeling of gentamicin, tobramycin and vancomycin clearance from neonates to adults: towards a semi-physiological function for maturation in glomerular filtration. Pharm Res. 2014;31(10):2643–54.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nguyen THT, Mouksassi M, Holford N, Freedman I, Hooker AC, John J, et al. Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(2):87–109.CrossRef Nguyen THT, Mouksassi M, Holford N, Freedman I, Hooker AC, John J, et al. Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6(2):87–109.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brink AJ, Richards GA, Lautenbach EEG, Rapeport N, Schillack V, Van Niekerk L, et al. Albumin concentration significantly impacts on free teicoplanin plasma concentrations in non-critically ill patients with chronic bone sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45(6):647–51.CrossRef Brink AJ, Richards GA, Lautenbach EEG, Rapeport N, Schillack V, Van Niekerk L, et al. Albumin concentration significantly impacts on free teicoplanin plasma concentrations in non-critically ill patients with chronic bone sepsis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45(6):647–51.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Falcoz C, Ferry N, Pozet N, Cuisinaud G, Zech PY, Sassard J. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in renal failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31(8):1255–62.CrossRef Falcoz C, Ferry N, Pozet N, Cuisinaud G, Zech PY, Sassard J. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in renal failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31(8):1255–62.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hari P, Bagga A, Mahajan P, Lakshmy R. Effect of malnutrition on serum creatinine and cystatin C levels. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(10):1757–61.CrossRef Hari P, Bagga A, Mahajan P, Lakshmy R. Effect of malnutrition on serum creatinine and cystatin C levels. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(10):1757–61.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Andersen TB, Eskild-Jensen A, Frøkiær J, Brøchner-Mortensen J. Measuring glomerular filtration rate in children; can cystatin C replace established methods? A review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(5):929–41.CrossRef Andersen TB, Eskild-Jensen A, Frøkiær J, Brøchner-Mortensen J. Measuring glomerular filtration rate in children; can cystatin C replace established methods? A review. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(5):929–41.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Soni SS, Ronco C, Katz N, Cruz DN. Early diagnosis of acute kidney injury: the promise of novel biomarkers. Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):165–74.CrossRef Soni SS, Ronco C, Katz N, Cruz DN. Early diagnosis of acute kidney injury: the promise of novel biomarkers. Blood Purif. 2009;28(3):165–74.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Davani S, Brard M, Royer B, Kantelip JP, Muret P. Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography methods for assay of teicoplanin: can correlation be improved? Pathol Biol (Paris). 2004;52(10):584–8.CrossRef Davani S, Brard M, Royer B, Kantelip JP, Muret P. Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography methods for assay of teicoplanin: can correlation be improved? Pathol Biol (Paris). 2004;52(10):584–8.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Mueller DM, Von Eckardstein A, Saleh L. Quantification of teicoplanin in plasma by LC-MS with online sample clean-up and comparison with QMS® assay. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(6):879–87.CrossRef Mueller DM, Von Eckardstein A, Saleh L. Quantification of teicoplanin in plasma by LC-MS with online sample clean-up and comparison with QMS® assay. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(6):879–87.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wilson AP, Grüneberg RN, Neu H. A critical review of the dosage of teicoplanin in Europe and the USA. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1994;4(Suppl 1):1–30.CrossRef Wilson AP, Grüneberg RN, Neu H. A critical review of the dosage of teicoplanin in Europe and the USA. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1994;4(Suppl 1):1–30.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Harding I, MacGowan AP, White LO, Darley ESR, Reed V. Teicoplanin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia: relationship between pre-dose serum concentrations and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45(6):835–41.CrossRef Harding I, MacGowan AP, White LO, Darley ESR, Reed V. Teicoplanin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia: relationship between pre-dose serum concentrations and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45(6):835–41.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kanazawa N, Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, Fukamizu T, Shigemi A, Yaji K, et al. An initial dosing method for teicoplanin based on the area under the serum concentration time curve required for MRSA eradication. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(2):297–300.CrossRef Kanazawa N, Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, Fukamizu T, Shigemi A, Yaji K, et al. An initial dosing method for teicoplanin based on the area under the serum concentration time curve required for MRSA eradication. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(2):297–300.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hagihara M, Umemura T, Kimura M, Mori T, Hasegawa T, Mikamo H. Exploration of optimal teicoplanin dosage based on pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of intensive care unit patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(1):10–6.CrossRef Hagihara M, Umemura T, Kimura M, Mori T, Hasegawa T, Mikamo H. Exploration of optimal teicoplanin dosage based on pharmacokinetic parameters for the treatment of intensive care unit patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(1):10–6.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Matsumoto K, Watanabe E, Kanazawa N, Fukamizu T, Shigemi A, Yokoyama Y, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of teicoplanin in patients with MRSA infections. Clin Pharmacol Adv Appl. 2016;8:15–8. Matsumoto K, Watanabe E, Kanazawa N, Fukamizu T, Shigemi A, Yokoyama Y, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of teicoplanin in patients with MRSA infections. Clin Pharmacol Adv Appl. 2016;8:15–8.
Metadata
Title
Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound and Total Teicoplanin in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients
Authors
L. B. S. Aulin
P. De Paepe
E. Dhont
A. de Jaeger
J. Vande Walle
W. Vandenberghe
B. C. McWhinney
J. P. J. Ungerer
J. G. C. van Hasselt
P. A. J. G. De Cock
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-020-00945-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2021 Go to the issue