Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Conivaptan in Subjects With Hepatic or Renal Impairment

Authors: Michael J. Roy, Keith A. Erdman, Anura T. Abeyratne, Lisa C. Plumb, Kenneth Lasseter, Dennis S. Riff, James J. Keirns

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conivaptan is a non-peptide dual antagonist of vasopressin V1A and V2 receptors that is approved in the United States as an intravenous formulation for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous conivaptan had not been studied in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intravenous conivaptan in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment compared with subjects with normal function.

Study Design

These studies were phase I, open-label pharmacokinetic studies conducted at two sites in the US.

Patients

Men and non-pregnant women 30–70 years of age were allocated to the mild (Child-Pugh classification score of 5–6) or moderate (Child-Pugh classification score of 7–9) hepatically impaired groups (n = 8–9 per group) based on their liver function assessed at screening. For the renal study, men and non-pregnant women between 18 and 70 years of age were assigned to renal function groups (n = 8–9 per group) based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) assessed at screening. Normal renal function was defined as an eGFR >80 ml/min, mild renal impairment as 50–80 ml/min, and moderate renal impairment as 30–49 ml/min. Subjects with normal hepatic or renal function were selected to match the race, sex, age, and body mass index of subjects enrolled in the impaired groups.

Intervention

Subjects were administered a 20-mg/30-min intravenous loading dose of conivaptan on day 1, followed by a 20-mg/23.5-h continuous conivaptan infusion. On day 2, immediately following the end of the day 1 infusion, a 20-mg/24-h continuous conivaptan infusion was administered.

Main Outcome Measure

Primary pharmacokinetic parameters estimated were the area under the plasma conivaptan concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC), plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the 20-mg loading dose (C LD), and plasma conivaptan concentrations at the end of the second day 20-mg/24-h continuous infusion (C 48).

Results

For each of C LD, C 48, and AUC, the mean values were similar for subjects with mild hepatic impairment and subjects with normal hepatic function. Subjects with moderate hepatic impairment had a 73 % higher C 48 and an 80 % higher AUC compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. There were no clinically relevant changes in conivaptan exposure in the mild and moderate renal impairment groups compared with subjects with normal renal function. Intravenous conivaptan was generally well tolerated in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment. Infusion-site reaction was the most commonly reported adverse event.

Conclusion

Overall exposure to conivaptan increased in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. Therefore, in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, conivaptan should be initiated with a loading dose of 10 mg over 30 min followed by 10 mg per day as a continuous infusion for 2–4 days, which is half the approved dose. No dose adjustment is necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment and in patients with mild hepatic impairment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoorn EJ, Lindemans J, Zietse R. Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(1):70–6.PubMedCrossRef Hoorn EJ, Lindemans J, Zietse R. Development of severe hyponatraemia in hospitalized patients: treatment-related risk factors and inadequate management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(1):70–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schrier RW. Body water homeostasis: clinical disorders of urinary dilution and concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1820–32.PubMedCrossRef Schrier RW. Body water homeostasis: clinical disorders of urinary dilution and concentration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1820–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Adrogue HJ. Consequences of inadequate management of hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25(3):240–9. Adrogue HJ. Consequences of inadequate management of hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2005;25(3):240–9.
4.
go back to reference Schrier RW, Bansal S. Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in acute illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(6):627–34.PubMedCrossRef Schrier RW, Bansal S. Diagnosis and management of hyponatremia in acute illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14(6):627–34.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vaidya C, Ho W, Freda BJ. Management of hyponatremia: providing treatment and avoiding harm. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010;77(10):715–26.PubMedCrossRef Vaidya C, Ho W, Freda BJ. Management of hyponatremia: providing treatment and avoiding harm. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010;77(10):715–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vaprisol® (conivaptan). Full prescribing information. Deerfield: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; 2012. Vaprisol® (conivaptan). Full prescribing information. Deerfield: Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Verbalis JG, Zeltser D, Smith N, Barve A, Andoh M. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in patients with euvolaemic hyponatraemia: subgroup analysis of a randomized, controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69(1):159–68.CrossRef Verbalis JG, Zeltser D, Smith N, Barve A, Andoh M. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in patients with euvolaemic hyponatraemia: subgroup analysis of a randomized, controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69(1):159–68.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zeltser D, Rosansky S, van Rensburg H, Verbalis JG, Smith N. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(5):447–57.PubMedCrossRef Zeltser D, Rosansky S, van Rensburg H, Verbalis JG, Smith N. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(5):447–57.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Angeli P, Wong F, Watson H, Gines P. Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: results of a patient population survey. Hepatology. 2006;44(6):1535–42.PubMedCrossRef Angeli P, Wong F, Watson H, Gines P. Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: results of a patient population survey. Hepatology. 2006;44(6):1535–42.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Porcel A, Diaz F, Rendon P, Macias M, Martin-Herrera L, Giron-Gonzalez JA. Dilutional hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(3):323–8.PubMedCrossRef Porcel A, Diaz F, Rendon P, Macias M, Martin-Herrera L, Giron-Gonzalez JA. Dilutional hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(3):323–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005; 42 Suppl(1): S100–7. Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005; 42 Suppl(1): S100–7.
13.
go back to reference Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41.PubMedCrossRef Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Collier J, Bassendine M. How to respond to abnormal liver function tests. Clin Med. 2002;2(5):406–9. Collier J, Bassendine M. How to respond to abnormal liver function tests. Clin Med. 2002;2(5):406–9.
16.
go back to reference Burke MD. Liver function: test selection and interpretation of results. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22(2):377–90.PubMedCrossRef Burke MD. Liver function: test selection and interpretation of results. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22(2):377–90.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Samsca® (tolvaptan). Full prescribing information. Tokyo: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; 2012. Samsca® (tolvaptan). Full prescribing information. Tokyo: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; 2012.
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Conivaptan in Subjects With Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Authors
Michael J. Roy
Keith A. Erdman
Anura T. Abeyratne
Lisa C. Plumb
Kenneth Lasseter
Dennis S. Riff
James J. Keirns
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing AG
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0047-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2013 Go to the issue