Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Original Research Article

Single-Center Evaluation of the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Azilsartan Medoxomil in Renal Impairment

Authors: Richard A. Preston, Aziz Karim, Caroline Dudkowski, Zhen Zhao, Dyal Garg, Oliver Lenz, Domenic A. Sica

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objective

Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker that decreases blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. It is a pro-drug and not detected in blood after oral administration because of rapid hydrolysis to the active moiety, azilsartan (AZL). AZL undergoes further metabolism to the major metabolite M-II and minor metabolites. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of AZL and its major metabolite.

Methods

This was a single-center, open-label, phase I parallel-group study which examined the single-dose (40-mg) pharmacokinetics of AZL and M-II in 24 subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis (n = 6 per group), respectively, and healthy matched subjects (n = 24).

Results

Renal impairment/disease did not cause clinically meaningful increases in exposure to AZL. M-II exposure was higher in all renally impaired subjects and highest in those with severe impairment (approx fivefold higher vs. control). M-II is pharmacologically inactive; increased exposure was not considered important in dose selection for AZL-M in subjects with renal impairment. Hemodialysis did not significantly remove AZL or M-II. Renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the plasma protein binding of AZL or M-II. Single doses of AZL-M 40 mg were well tolerated in all subject groups.

Conclusions

Based on the pharmacokinetic and tolerability findings, no dose adjustment of AZL-M is required for subjects with any degree of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sica DA. The pharmacology of agents that interfere with renin-angiotensin system activity. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System. 2006;7:247–50.CrossRef Sica DA. The pharmacology of agents that interfere with renin-angiotensin system activity. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System. 2006;7:247–50.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, LIFE Study Group, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995–1003.PubMedCrossRef Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, LIFE Study Group, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995–1003.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall Programme. Lancet. 2003;362:759–66.PubMedCrossRef Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall Programme. Lancet. 2003;362:759–66.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cohn JN, Tognoni G, Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–75.PubMedCrossRef Cohn JN, Tognoni G, Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–75.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Solomon SD, Wang D, Finn P, et al. Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Circulation. 2004;110:2180–3.PubMedCrossRef Solomon SD, Wang D, Finn P, et al. Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Circulation. 2004;110:2180–3.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Dahlof B, Edelman JM, LIFE study group, et al. Effect of losartan on sudden cardiac death in people with diabetes: data from the LIFE study. Lancet. 2003;362:619–20.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Dahlof B, Edelman JM, LIFE study group, et al. Effect of losartan on sudden cardiac death in people with diabetes: data from the LIFE study. Lancet. 2003;362:619–20.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, Telmisartan Randomised Assessment Study in ACE-Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) investigators, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1174–83.PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, Telmisartan Randomised Assessment Study in ACE-Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) investigators, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1174–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Diener HC, Sacco RL, PRoFESS Study Group, et al. Telmisartan to prevent recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1225–37.PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Diener HC, Sacco RL, PRoFESS Study Group, et al. Telmisartan to prevent recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1225–37.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Demers C, McMurray JJV, Swedberg K, CHARM Investigators, et al. Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2005;294:1794–8.PubMedCrossRef Demers C, McMurray JJV, Swedberg K, CHARM Investigators, et al. Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2005;294:1794–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:1004–10.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:1004–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Solomon SD, Wang D, Finn P, et al. Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program. Circulation. 2004;110:2180–3.PubMedCrossRef Solomon SD, Wang D, Finn P, et al. Effect of candesartan on cause-specific mortality in heart failure patients: The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) Program. Circulation. 2004;110:2180–3.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, RENAAL Study Investigators, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–9.PubMedCrossRef Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, RENAAL Study Investigators, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Collaborative Study Group, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–60.PubMedCrossRef Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Collaborative Study Group, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–60.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Arner P, Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria Study Group. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:870–8.PubMedCrossRef Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, Gomis R, Andersen S, Arner P, Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria Study Group. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:870–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:81–8.CrossRef Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:81–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57:413–20.PubMedCrossRef White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57:413–20.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:467–72.CrossRef Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:467–72.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Takeda Global Research & Development Center. Global Investigator’s Brochure. TAK-491. Azilsartan medoxomil. Edition 5.0. Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc., Deerfield; 2008. Takeda Global Research & Development Center. Global Investigator’s Brochure. TAK-491. Azilsartan medoxomil. Edition 5.0. Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc., Deerfield; 2008.
19.
go back to reference Takeda Global Research & Development Center. A phase 1, open-label mass balance and excretion study of [14C] TAK-491 following oral administration in healthy male subjects. Report No. 01-06-TL-491-012. Deerfield: Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. 2007. Takeda Global Research & Development Center. A phase 1, open-label mass balance and excretion study of [14C] TAK-491 following oral administration in healthy male subjects. Report No. 01-06-TL-491-012. Deerfield: Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. 2007.
21.
go back to reference Preston RA, Karim A, Garg D, et al. Single-center phase I study of the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in hepatic impairment (abstract no. PII-99). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(Suppl 1):S89. Preston RA, Karim A, Garg D, et al. Single-center phase I study of the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) in hepatic impairment (abstract no. PII-99). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(Suppl 1):S89.
22.
go back to reference Harrell R, Karim A, Zhang W, et al. Effects of age, gender, and race on the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of azilsartan medoxomil in healthy subjects (abstract no. PII-69). Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91(Suppl 1):S78. Harrell R, Karim A, Zhang W, et al. Effects of age, gender, and race on the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of azilsartan medoxomil in healthy subjects (abstract no. PII-69). Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91(Suppl 1):S78.
23.
go back to reference Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J, Vilarbi R, Kurtz TW. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertension. 2011;29:2476–83.CrossRef Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J, Vilarbi R, Kurtz TW. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertension. 2011;29:2476–83.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Baker WL, White WB. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:1506–15.PubMedCrossRef Baker WL, White WB. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:1506–15.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Perry C. Azilsartan medoxomil. A review of its use in hypertension. Clin Drug Investig. 2012;32:621–39.PubMed Perry C. Azilsartan medoxomil. A review of its use in hypertension. Clin Drug Investig. 2012;32:621–39.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Zaiken K, Cheng JWM. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor blocker. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1577–89.PubMedCrossRef Zaiken K, Cheng JWM. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin II receptor blocker. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1577–89.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-Center Evaluation of the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of the Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Azilsartan Medoxomil in Renal Impairment
Authors
Richard A. Preston
Aziz Karim
Caroline Dudkowski
Zhen Zhao
Dyal Garg
Oliver Lenz
Domenic A. Sica
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing AG
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-013-0044-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 5/2013 Go to the issue