Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018 | Current Opinion

Policy Options for Infliximab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Given Emerging Evidence for Switching

Authors: Don Husereau, Brian Feagan, Carl Selya-Hammer

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Biosimilars are becoming increasingly available internationally as patents expire on the originator biologic drugs they are intended to copy. Although substitution policies seen with generic drugs are being considered as a means to reduce expenditures on biologics, some biosimilars pose particular challenges in that the act of substitution may eventually lead to increased rates of therapeutic failure. As evidence requirements from regulators do not directly address this challenge, switch trials of biosimilars have emerged that may provide further answers. Using infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease as an example, we critically examine emerging evidence from two key switch trials (NOR-SWITCH and NCT020968610) and discuss the clinical and economic implications of these and what policy options may be most reasonable for payers. Options include reimbursing biosimilars for only newly diagnosed patients, using product-listing agreements to manage uncertainty, or using tiered co-payments or other incentives to promote biosimilar use.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Manolis CH, Rajasenan K, Harwin W, et al. Biosimilars: opportunities to promote optimization through payer and provider collaboration. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22:S3–9.CrossRefPubMed Manolis CH, Rajasenan K, Harwin W, et al. Biosimilars: opportunities to promote optimization through payer and provider collaboration. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22:S3–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gray T, Bertch K, Galt K, et al. Guidelines for therapeutic interchange-2004. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25:1666–80.CrossRefPubMed Gray T, Bertch K, Galt K, et al. Guidelines for therapeutic interchange-2004. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25:1666–80.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mills EJ, Gardner D, Thorlund K, et al. A users’ guide to understanding therapeutic substitutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:305–13.CrossRefPubMed Mills EJ, Gardner D, Thorlund K, et al. A users’ guide to understanding therapeutic substitutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:305–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Feagan BG, Choquette D, Ghosh S, et al. The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars. Biologicals. 2014;42:177–83.CrossRefPubMed Feagan BG, Choquette D, Ghosh S, et al. The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars. Biologicals. 2014;42:177–83.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nanda KS, Cheifetz AS, Moss AC. Impact of antibodies to infliximab on clinical outcomes and serum infliximab levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:40–7 (quiz 48).CrossRefPubMed Nanda KS, Cheifetz AS, Moss AC. Impact of antibodies to infliximab on clinical outcomes and serum infliximab levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:40–7 (quiz 48).CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CLM, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. 2011;305:1460–8.CrossRefPubMed Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CLM, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. 2011;305:1460–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M, et al. Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:542–53.CrossRefPubMed Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M, et al. Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:542–53.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gentileschi S, Barreca C, Bellisai F, et al. Switch from infliximab to infliximab biosimilar: efficacy and safety in a cohort of patients with different rheumatic diseases. Response to: Nikiphorou E, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1677–83 (Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16:1311–1312).CrossRef Gentileschi S, Barreca C, Bellisai F, et al. Switch from infliximab to infliximab biosimilar: efficacy and safety in a cohort of patients with different rheumatic diseases. Response to: Nikiphorou E, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1677–83 (Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16:1311–1312).CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Jacobs I, Kirchhoff C, et al. Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;9:573–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dranitsaris G, Jacobs I, Kirchhoff C, et al. Drug tendering: drug supply and shortage implications for the uptake of biosimilars. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;9:573–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Weise M, Kurki P, Wolff-Holz E, et al. Biosimilars: the science of extrapolation. Blood. 2014;124:3191–6.CrossRefPubMed Weise M, Kurki P, Wolff-Holz E, et al. Biosimilars: the science of extrapolation. Blood. 2014;124:3191–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1383–95.CrossRefPubMed Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, et al. Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1383–95.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vermeire S, Noman M, Van Assche G, et al. Effectiveness of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy in suppressing the formation of antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2007;56:1226–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vermeire S, Noman M, Van Assche G, et al. Effectiveness of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy in suppressing the formation of antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2007;56:1226–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Gabbani T, Deiana S, Annese V. CT-P13: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2017;11:1653–61.CrossRef Gabbani T, Deiana S, Annese V. CT-P13: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2017;11:1653–61.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Church PC, Guan J, Walters TD, et al. Infliximab maintains durable response and facilitates catch-up growth in luminal pediatric Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1177–86.CrossRefPubMed Church PC, Guan J, Walters TD, et al. Infliximab maintains durable response and facilitates catch-up growth in luminal pediatric Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:1177–86.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Braun J, Kudrin A. Switching to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13): evidence of clinical safety, effectiveness and impact on public health. Biologicals. 2016;44:257–66.CrossRefPubMed Braun J, Kudrin A. Switching to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13): evidence of clinical safety, effectiveness and impact on public health. Biologicals. 2016;44:257–66.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Vegh Z, Kurti Z, Lakatos PL. Real-life efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of biosimilar infliximab. DDI. 2017;35:101–6. Vegh Z, Kurti Z, Lakatos PL. Real-life efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of biosimilar infliximab. DDI. 2017;35:101–6.
19.
go back to reference Danese S, Fiorino G, Raine T, et al. ECCO position statement on the use of biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease—an update. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:26–34.CrossRefPubMed Danese S, Fiorino G, Raine T, et al. ECCO position statement on the use of biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease—an update. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:26–34.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2304–16.CrossRefPubMed Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2304–16.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Billmeier U, Dieterich W, Neurath MF, et al. Molecular mechanism of action of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9300–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Billmeier U, Dieterich W, Neurath MF, et al. Molecular mechanism of action of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9300–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Kim YH, Ye BD, Pesegova M, et al. Phase III randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to compare biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) with innovator infliximab (INX) in patients with active Crohn’s disease: early efficacy and safety results. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:S65.CrossRef Kim YH, Ye BD, Pesegova M, et al. Phase III randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to compare biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) with innovator infliximab (INX) in patients with active Crohn’s disease: early efficacy and safety results. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:S65.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Danese S, Fiorino G, Michetti P. Changes in biosimilar knowledge among European Crohn’s colitis organization [ECCO] members: an updated survey. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1362–5.CrossRefPubMed Danese S, Fiorino G, Michetti P. Changes in biosimilar knowledge among European Crohn’s colitis organization [ECCO] members: an updated survey. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1362–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Considerations in demonstrating interchangeability with a reference product—DRAFT GUIDANCE. 2017. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Considerations in demonstrating interchangeability with a reference product—DRAFT GUIDANCE. 2017.
32.
go back to reference Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Severens JL, Brunenberg DEM, Fenwick EAL, et al. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:1207–14.CrossRefPubMed Severens JL, Brunenberg DEM, Fenwick EAL, et al. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and a reluctance to lose. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:1207–14.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference O’Brien BJ, Gertsen K, Willan AR, et al. Is there a kink in consumers’ threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ. 2002;11:175–80.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien BJ, Gertsen K, Willan AR, et al. Is there a kink in consumers’ threshold value for cost-effectiveness in health care? Health Econ. 2002;11:175–80.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Eckermann S. Kinky thresholds revisited: opportunity costs differ in the NE and SW quadrants. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:7–13.CrossRefPubMed Eckermann S. Kinky thresholds revisited: opportunity costs differ in the NE and SW quadrants. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:7–13.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Happe LE, Clark D, Holliday E, et al. A systematic literature review assessing the directional impact of managed care formulary restrictions on medication adherence, clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and health care resource utilization. JMCP. 2014;20:677–84.CrossRefPubMed Happe LE, Clark D, Holliday E, et al. A systematic literature review assessing the directional impact of managed care formulary restrictions on medication adherence, clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and health care resource utilization. JMCP. 2014;20:677–84.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Grabowski HG, Guha R, Salgado M. Regulatory and cost barriers are likely to limit biosimilar development and expected savings in the near future. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:1048–57.CrossRef Grabowski HG, Guha R, Salgado M. Regulatory and cost barriers are likely to limit biosimilar development and expected savings in the near future. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:1048–57.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Husereau D, Henshall C, Sampietro-Colom L, et al. Changing health technology assessment paradigms? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:191–9.CrossRefPubMed Husereau D, Henshall C, Sampietro-Colom L, et al. Changing health technology assessment paradigms? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:191–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Minghetti P, Rocco P, Schellekens H. The constrained prescription, interchangeability and substitution of biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:688–9.CrossRefPubMed Minghetti P, Rocco P, Schellekens H. The constrained prescription, interchangeability and substitution of biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:688–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Beilman CL, Ma C, McCabe C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of infliximab’s biosimilar CT-P13 compared to innovator infliximab for the management of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:S447.CrossRef Beilman CL, Ma C, McCabe C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of infliximab’s biosimilar CT-P13 compared to innovator infliximab for the management of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:S447.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Berntgen M, Gourvil A, Pavlovic M, et al. Improving the contribution of regulatory assessment reports to health technology assessments—a collaboration between the European medicines agency and the European network for health technology assessment. Value Health. 2014;17:634–41.CrossRefPubMed Berntgen M, Gourvil A, Pavlovic M, et al. Improving the contribution of regulatory assessment reports to health technology assessments—a collaboration between the European medicines agency and the European network for health technology assessment. Value Health. 2014;17:634–41.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Henshall C, Mardhani-Bayne L, Frønsdal KB, et al. Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:253–60.CrossRefPubMed Henshall C, Mardhani-Bayne L, Frønsdal KB, et al. Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:253–60.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Chen YHJ, Chen C. Testing superiority at interim analyses in a non-inferiority trial. Stat Med. 2012;31:1531–42.CrossRefPubMed Chen YHJ, Chen C. Testing superiority at interim analyses in a non-inferiority trial. Stat Med. 2012;31:1531–42.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16:231–50.CrossRefPubMed Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16:231–50.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Bodger K, Kikuchi T, Hughes D. Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:265–74.CrossRefPubMed Bodger K, Kikuchi T, Hughes D. Cost-effectiveness of biological therapy for Crohn’s disease: Markov cohort analyses incorporating United Kingdom patient-level cost data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:265–74.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Metadata
Title
Policy Options for Infliximab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Given Emerging Evidence for Switching
Authors
Don Husereau
Brian Feagan
Carl Selya-Hammer
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-018-0371-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2018 Go to the issue