Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 6/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Current Opinion

Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?

Authors: Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Adrian Towse, Mikel Berdud

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The term ‘biosimilar’ refers to an alternative similar version of an off-patent innovative originator biotechnology product (the ‘reference product’). Several biosimilars have been approved in Europe, and a number of top-selling biological medicines have lost, or will lose, patent protection over the next 5 years. We look at the experience in Europe so far. The USA has finally implemented a regulatory route for biosimilar approval. We recommend that European and US governments and payers take a strategic approach to get value for money from the use of biosimilars by (1) supporting and incentivising generation of high-quality comprehensive outcomes data on the effectiveness and safety of biosimilars and originator products; and (2) ensuring that incentives are in place for budget holders to benefit from price competition. This may create greater willingness on the part of budget holders and clinicians to use biosimilar and originator products with comparable outcomes interchangeably, and may drive down prices. Other options, such as direct price cuts for originator products or substitution rules without outcomes data, are likely to discourage biosimilar entry. With such approaches, governments may achieve a one-off cut in originator prices but may put at risk the creation of a more competitive market that would, in time, produce much greater savings. It was the creation of competitive markets for chemical generic drugs—notably, in the USA, the UK and Germany—rather than price control, that enabled payers to achieve the high discounts now taken for granted.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Grabowski HG, Ridley DB, Schulman KA. Entry and competition in generic biologicals. Manag Decis Econ. 2007;28(4–5):439–51.CrossRef Grabowski HG, Ridley DB, Schulman KA. Entry and competition in generic biologicals. Manag Decis Econ. 2007;28(4–5):439–51.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van de Vooren K, Curto A, Garattini L. Biosimilar versus generic drugs: same but different? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:125–7.CrossRefPubMed van de Vooren K, Curto A, Garattini L. Biosimilar versus generic drugs: same but different? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:125–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bocquet F, Paubel P, Fusier I, Cordonnier A-L, Le Pen C, Sinegre M. Biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor uptakes in the EU-5 markets: a descriptive analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:315–26.PubMed Bocquet F, Paubel P, Fusier I, Cordonnier A-L, Le Pen C, Sinegre M. Biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor uptakes in the EU-5 markets: a descriptive analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12:315–26.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bocquet F, Paubel P, Fusier I, Cordonnier A-L, Sinegre M, Le Pen C. Biosimilar versus patented erythropoietins: learning from 5 years of European and Japanese experience. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:47–59.CrossRefPubMed Bocquet F, Paubel P, Fusier I, Cordonnier A-L, Sinegre M, Le Pen C. Biosimilar versus patented erythropoietins: learning from 5 years of European and Japanese experience. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:47–59.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dylst P, Simoens S, Vulto A. Reference pricing systems in Europe: characteristics and consequences. GaBI J. 2012;1(3–4):127–31.CrossRef Dylst P, Simoens S, Vulto A. Reference pricing systems in Europe: characteristics and consequences. GaBI J. 2012;1(3–4):127–31.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stargardt T, Schreyögg J, Busse R. Pharmaceutical reference pricing in Germany: definition of therapeutic groups, price setting through regression procedure and effect [in German]. Gesundheitswesen. 2005;67(7):468–77.CrossRefPubMed Stargardt T, Schreyögg J, Busse R. Pharmaceutical reference pricing in Germany: definition of therapeutic groups, price setting through regression procedure and effect [in German]. Gesundheitswesen. 2005;67(7):468–77.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Curto A, Ghislandi S, van de Vooren K, Duranti S, Garattini L. Regional tenders on biosimilars in Italy: an empirical analysis of awarded prices. Health Policy. 2014;116(2–3):182–7.CrossRefPubMed Curto A, Ghislandi S, van de Vooren K, Duranti S, Garattini L. Regional tenders on biosimilars in Italy: an empirical analysis of awarded prices. Health Policy. 2014;116(2–3):182–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Maartenskliniek Woerden, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis. The effect of switching treatment from innovator infliximab to infliximab biosimilar on efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis in daily clinical care [Nederlands Trial Register no. NTR5279]. Amsterdam: Dutch Cochrane Centre; 2015. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5279. Accessed 6 Oct 2015. Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Maartenskliniek Woerden, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis. The effect of switching treatment from innovator infliximab to infliximab biosimilar on efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis in daily clinical care [Nederlands Trial Register no. NTR5279]. Amsterdam: Dutch Cochrane Centre; 2015. http://​www.​trialregister.​nl/​trialreg/​admin/​rctview.​asp?​TC=​5279. Accessed 6 Oct 2015.
29.
go back to reference Blackstone E, Fuhr J. Biopharmaceuticals: the economic equation. Biotechnol Health. 2007;4(6):41–5. Blackstone E, Fuhr J. Biopharmaceuticals: the economic equation. Biotechnol Health. 2007;4(6):41–5.
31.
go back to reference Grabowski H, Kyle M. Generic competition and market exclusivity periods in pharmaceuticals. Manag Decis Econ. 2007;28(4–5):491–502.CrossRef Grabowski H, Kyle M. Generic competition and market exclusivity periods in pharmaceuticals. Manag Decis Econ. 2007;28(4–5):491–502.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Reiffen D, Ward M. Generic drug industry dynamics. Rev Econ Stat. 2005;87(1):37–49.CrossRef Reiffen D, Ward M. Generic drug industry dynamics. Rev Econ Stat. 2005;87(1):37–49.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Saha A, Grabowski H, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, Bizan O. Generic competition in the US pharmaceutical industry. Int J Econ Bus. 2006;13(1):15–38.CrossRef Saha A, Grabowski H, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, Bizan O. Generic competition in the US pharmaceutical industry. Int J Econ Bus. 2006;13(1):15–38.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Price regulation and relative delays in generic drug adoption. J Health Econ. 2014;38:109.CrossRef Costa-Font J, McGuire A, Varol N. Price regulation and relative delays in generic drug adoption. J Health Econ. 2014;38:109.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Puig-Junoy J. Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649–63.CrossRefPubMed Puig-Junoy J. Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649–63.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Ahlstrom A, King R, Brown R, Clavdemans J, Mendelson D. Modeling federal cost savings from follow-on biologics. Washington DC: Avalere Health LLC; 2007. Ahlstrom A, King R, Brown R, Clavdemans J, Mendelson D. Modeling federal cost savings from follow-on biologics. Washington DC: Avalere Health LLC; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?
Authors
Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz
Adrian Towse
Mikel Berdud
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0380-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

PharmacoEconomics 6/2016 Go to the issue