Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 1/2013

Open Access 01-02-2013 | Original Research Article

Safety and Efficacy of Fimasartan in Patients with Arterial Hypertension (Safe-KanArb Study)

An Open-Label Observational Study

Authors: Jeong Bae Park, Ki-Chul Sung, Seok-Min Kang, Eun Joo Cho

Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) play a key role in hypertension therapy. Recently, fimasartan, the ninth ARB, was developed, but its safety and efficacy have not been well established.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine whether age, sex, concomitant disease, and current antihypertensive medications affect the safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension.

Methods

This was a large-scale, open-label observational study to determine the safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with hypertension. Patients who were treated for more than 2 months with fimasartan (60 or 120 mg, once daily) were recruited, and the data were systematically collected using electronic case report forms. Written informed consent forms were obtained from all patients.

Results

A total of 14,151 patients (50.7 % males; mean age 59 ± 12 years) were evaluated, of whom 37.9 % were never treated with fimasartan, 53.5 % were switched to fimasartan, and 8.5 % had fimasartan added to their treatment. Overall, fimasartan reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 145.4 ± 18.1 to 126.8 ± 12.6 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 88.7 ± 11.8 to 79.0 ± 8.7 mmHg (all p < 0.001). The pulse rate decreased from 74.4 ± 10.3 to 71.9 ± 9.2 beats/min in comparison with before treatment (p < 0.001). The reductions were similar between sexes, age groups, and patients with and without co-morbidities, and were not dependent on prior or concomitant treatment with other antihypertensive drugs. Adverse events were reported in 3.31 % (treatment-emergent) and 2.35 % (drug-related) of patients; there were no dose differences for adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (1.55 %) and headache (0.52 %); other adverse events were rare. The responder rate (DBP to <90 mmHg or a reduction of ≥10 mmHg) and the goal rate (combined SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg) were 85.0 and 75.6 %, respectively. Global drug compliance was rated as excellent, very good, good, and poor in 68.1, 26.9, 3.4, and 1.7 % of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The safety, efficacy, and compliance of fimasartan were found to be excellent in a large patient population that included patients potentially at higher risk for adverse events.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wassmann S, Nickenig G. The role of the AT1 receptor in the cardiovascular continuum. Eur Heart J. 2004;6(Suppl H):H3–9.CrossRef Wassmann S, Nickenig G. The role of the AT1 receptor in the cardiovascular continuum. Eur Heart J. 2004;6(Suppl H):H3–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aulakh GK, Sodhi RK, Singh M. An update on non-peptide angiotensin receptor antagonists and related RAAS modulators. Life Sci. 2007;81(8):615–39.PubMedCrossRef Aulakh GK, Sodhi RK, Singh M. An update on non-peptide angiotensin receptor antagonists and related RAAS modulators. Life Sci. 2007;81(8):615–39.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gavras H, Flessas A, Ryan TJ, et al. Angiotensin II inhibition: treatment of congestive cardiac failure in a high-renin hypertension. JAMA. 1977;238:880–92.PubMedCrossRef Gavras H, Flessas A, Ryan TJ, et al. Angiotensin II inhibition: treatment of congestive cardiac failure in a high-renin hypertension. JAMA. 1977;238:880–92.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choi DJ, Han S, Jeon ES, et al. Characteristics, outcomes and predictors of long-term mortality for patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a report from the Korean heart failure registry. Korean Circ J. 2011;41(7):363–71.PubMedCrossRef Choi DJ, Han S, Jeon ES, et al. Characteristics, outcomes and predictors of long-term mortality for patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a report from the Korean heart failure registry. Korean Circ J. 2011;41(7):363–71.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sawada T, Yamada H, Dahlöf B, et al. on Kyoto Heart Study Group. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: Kyoto Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(20):2461–9. Sawada T, Yamada H, Dahlöf B, et al. on Kyoto Heart Study Group. Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: Kyoto Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(20):2461–9.
6.
go back to reference Mochizuki S, Dahlöf B, Shimizu M, et al. on Jikei Heart Study Group. Valsartan in a Japanese population with hypertension and other cardiovascular disease (Jikei Heart Study): a randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint morbidity-mortality study. Lancet. 2007;369(9571):1431–9. Mochizuki S, Dahlöf B, Shimizu M, et al. on Jikei Heart Study Group. Valsartan in a Japanese population with hypertension and other cardiovascular disease (Jikei Heart Study): a randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint morbidity-mortality study. Lancet. 2007;369(9571):1431–9.
7.
go back to reference Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–87.PubMedCrossRef Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–87.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ogihara T, Kikuchi K, Matsuoka H, et al. Japanese Society of Hypertension committee. The Japanese society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2009). Hypertens Res. 2009;32(1):3–107. Ogihara T, Kikuchi K, Matsuoka H, et al. Japanese Society of Hypertension committee. The Japanese society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2009). Hypertens Res. 2009;32(1):3–107.
9.
go back to reference The Seventh Report of Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72. The Seventh Report of Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72.
10.
go back to reference Wexler RR, Greenlee WJ, Irvin JD, et al. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: the next generation in antihypertensive therapy. J Med Chem. 1996;39:625–56.PubMedCrossRef Wexler RR, Greenlee WJ, Irvin JD, et al. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: the next generation in antihypertensive therapy. J Med Chem. 1996;39:625–56.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zannad F, Fay R. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007;21(2):181–90.PubMedCrossRef Zannad F, Fay R. Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007;21(2):181–90.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57(3):413–20.PubMedCrossRef White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57(3):413–20.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nagel JM, Tietz AB, Göke B, et al. The effect of telmisartan on glucose and lipid metabolism in nondiabetic, insulin-resistant subjects. Metabolism. 2006;55(9):1149–54.PubMedCrossRef Nagel JM, Tietz AB, Göke B, et al. The effect of telmisartan on glucose and lipid metabolism in nondiabetic, insulin-resistant subjects. Metabolism. 2006;55(9):1149–54.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sica DA, Schoolwerth AC. Part 1. Uric acid and losartan. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2002;11(5):475–82.PubMedCrossRef Sica DA, Schoolwerth AC. Part 1. Uric acid and losartan. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2002;11(5):475–82.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yi S, Kim TE, Yoon SH, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction of fimasartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with amlodipine in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;57:682–9.PubMedCrossRef Yi S, Kim TE, Yoon SH, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction of fimasartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with amlodipine in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011;57:682–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kim TW, Yoo BW, Lee JK, Kim JH, Lee KT, Chi YH, Lee JY. Synthesis and antihypertensive activity of pyrimidin-4(3H)-one derivatives as losartan analogue for new angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1) antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22(4):1649–54.PubMedCrossRef Kim TW, Yoo BW, Lee JK, Kim JH, Lee KT, Chi YH, Lee JY. Synthesis and antihypertensive activity of pyrimidin-4(3H)-one derivatives as losartan analogue for new angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1) antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22(4):1649–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee SE, Kim YJ, Lee HY, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, compared with losartan (50/100 mg): A 12-week, Phase III, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose escalation clinical trial with an optional 12-week extension phase in adult Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Clin Ther. 2012;34(3):552–68.PubMedCrossRef Lee SE, Kim YJ, Lee HY, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, compared with losartan (50/100 mg): A 12-week, Phase III, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose escalation clinical trial with an optional 12-week extension phase in adult Korean patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Clin Ther. 2012;34(3):552–68.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Basile J. Blood pressure responder rates versus goal rates: which metric matters? Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;3(2):157–74.PubMedCrossRef Basile J. Blood pressure responder rates versus goal rates: which metric matters? Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;3(2):157–74.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, on Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) Investigators, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1174–83.PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, on Telmisartan Randomised AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) Investigators, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1174–83.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McIntyre M, Coffe SE, Michalok RA, et al. Losartan, an orally active angiotensin (AT1) receptor antagonist: a review of its efficacy and safety in essential hypertension. Pharmacol Ther. 1997;74(2):181–94.PubMedCrossRef McIntyre M, Coffe SE, Michalok RA, et al. Losartan, an orally active angiotensin (AT1) receptor antagonist: a review of its efficacy and safety in essential hypertension. Pharmacol Ther. 1997;74(2):181–94.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McClellan JK, Goa KL. Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its use in essential hypertensions. Drugs. 1998;56(5):847–69.PubMedCrossRef McClellan JK, Goa KL. Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its use in essential hypertensions. Drugs. 1998;56(5):847–69.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gillis JC, Merkham A. Irbesartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 1997;54(6):885–902.PubMedCrossRef Gillis JC, Merkham A. Irbesartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 1997;54(6):885–902.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:467–72.CrossRef Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:467–72.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, et al. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a metaanalysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:495–9.PubMedCrossRef Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, et al. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a metaanalysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101:495–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, et al. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1547–59.PubMedCrossRef Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, et al. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1547–59.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sica DA, Black HR. Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: ACE inhibitor-related angioedema: can angiotensin-receptor blockers be safely used? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002;4:375–80.CrossRef Sica DA, Black HR. Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: ACE inhibitor-related angioedema: can angiotensin-receptor blockers be safely used? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002;4:375–80.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2001;3:283–91.CrossRef Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2001;3:283–91.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Neutel JM, Smith DHG. Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: Meta-analysis of a clinical database. J Clin Hypertens. 2003;1:58–63. Neutel JM, Smith DHG. Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: Meta-analysis of a clinical database. J Clin Hypertens. 2003;1:58–63.
30.
go back to reference Blankestijn PJ, Rupp H. Clinical profile of eprosartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2008;6(4):253–7.PubMedCrossRef Blankestijn PJ, Rupp H. Clinical profile of eprosartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2008;6(4):253–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wogen J, Kreilick CA, Livornese RC, et al. Patient adherence with amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan therapy in a usual-care setting. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(5):424–9.PubMed Wogen J, Kreilick CA, Livornese RC, et al. Patient adherence with amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan therapy in a usual-care setting. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(5):424–9.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Vegter S, Nguyen NH, Visser ST, et al. Compliance, persistence, and switching patterns for ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(9):609–16.PubMed Vegter S, Nguyen NH, Visser ST, et al. Compliance, persistence, and switching patterns for ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(9):609–16.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Enlund H. Measuring patient compliance in antihypertensive therapy—some methodological aspects. J Clin Hosp Pharm. 1982;7(1):43–51.PubMed Enlund H. Measuring patient compliance in antihypertensive therapy—some methodological aspects. J Clin Hosp Pharm. 1982;7(1):43–51.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and Efficacy of Fimasartan in Patients with Arterial Hypertension (Safe-KanArb Study)
An Open-Label Observational Study
Authors
Jeong Bae Park
Ki-Chul Sung
Seok-Min Kang
Eun Joo Cho
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing AG
Published in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Electronic ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-013-0004-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 1/2013 Go to the issue