Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 1/2021

01-06-2021 | Obesity | Research article

Evaluating obesity publications: from bibliometrics to altmetrics

Authors: Azadeh Aletaha, Akbar Soltani, Firoozeh Dokhani

Published in: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

study the bibliometrics indicators of Iranian authors in the field of obesity and Correlation Comparison between conventional citation counts and altmetrics scores from 2005 to 2019.

Methods

The study uses bibliometric characteristics and altmetric analysis. Population consists of 5359 articles out of 8220 in the field of obesity which have specified Iran as the affiliated country and indexed by Scopus between 2005 to 2019. Citations was extracted from Scopus database and visualized bibliographic data by VOS viewer software version 17, as well as Altmetric Explorer was applied for altmetrics data. The spearman correlation was used to analyze distributions of altmetrics and citation. Statistical analysis was utilized using SPSS software version 17.

Results

According to altmetrics finding among 2221 articles, 90% of articles had focused on different social media. The major interaction of researches has taken place in Twitter respectively News and Facebook. a positive correlation (r = 0.31) has been found between citation and altmetrics. As a result, Institutes with the highest degree of co-authorship had the top 10 articles with the highest altmetrics score.

Conclusion

Depending on the degree of correlation suggest that altmetrics should be seen as complements to, rather than alternatives to citations. Altmetrics indicators will be very useful for health policymaking and aid them with identifying important factors driving altmetric events. Also it could help to reveal the hidden value of some medical papers. Our findings can help international communications for scientific collaboration at the level of business and health care industry, and emergency managers gain a comprehensive understanding of the research area.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Björneborn L. Small-world link structures across an academic web space: a library and information science approach: Citeseer; 2004. Björneborn L. Small-world link structures across an academic web space: a library and information science approach: Citeseer; 2004.
2.
go back to reference Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of informetrics. 2014;8(4):895–903.CrossRef Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of informetrics. 2014;8(4):895–903.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2014;98(2):1131–43.CrossRef Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2014;98(2):1131–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zahedi Z. Analyzing readerships of International Iranian publications in Mendeley: an altmetrics study. arXiv preprint arXiv:150501342. 2015. Zahedi Z. Analyzing readerships of International Iranian publications in Mendeley: an altmetrics study. arXiv preprint arXiv:150501342. 2015.
6.
go back to reference Zahedi Z, Van Eck NJ. Visualizing readership activity of Mendeley users using VOSviewer. Bloomington: IN, USA; 2014. Zahedi Z, Van Eck NJ. Visualizing readership activity of Mendeley users using VOSviewer. Bloomington: IN, USA; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Alhoori H, Furuta R, Tabet M, Samaka M, Fox EA, editors. Altmetrics for country-level research assessment. International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries; 2014: Springer. Alhoori H, Furuta R, Tabet M, Samaka M, Fox EA, editors. Altmetrics for country-level research assessment. International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries; 2014: Springer.
8.
go back to reference Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64841.CrossRef Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64841.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66(9):1832–46.CrossRef Mohammadi E, Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66(9):1832–46.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Scarlat MM, Mavrogenis AF, Pećina M, Niculescu M. Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with international Orthopaedics. Int Orthop. 2015;39(8):1459–64.CrossRef Scarlat MM, Mavrogenis AF, Pećina M, Niculescu M. Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with international Orthopaedics. Int Orthop. 2015;39(8):1459–64.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1027–42.CrossRef Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1027–42.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Eysenbach G. Correction: can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e7.CrossRef Eysenbach G. Correction: can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(8):1060–72.CrossRef Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(8):1060–72.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thelwall M, Kousha K, Dinsmore A. Dolby K. Aslib Journal of Information Management: Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations; 2015. Thelwall M, Kousha K, Dinsmore A. Dolby K. Aslib Journal of Information Management: Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations; 2015.
15.
go back to reference Wilson P, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: an analysis of 45 fields. 2015. Wilson P, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: an analysis of 45 fields. 2015.
16.
go back to reference Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, Priem J, Shema H, Terliesner J. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1145–63.CrossRef Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, Priem J, Shema H, Terliesner J. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1145–63.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Erdt M, Nagarajan A, Sin S-CJ, Theng Y-L. Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1117–66.CrossRef Erdt M, Nagarajan A, Sin S-CJ, Theng Y-L. Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1117–66.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Ayllón JM, Lopez-Cozar ED. The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, Researcherid, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:160202412. 2016. Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Ayllón JM, Lopez-Cozar ED. The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google Scholar citations, Researcherid, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:160202412. 2016.
19.
go back to reference de Winter JC. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics. 2015;102(2):1773–9.CrossRef de Winter JC. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics. 2015;102(2):1773–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e123.CrossRef Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e123.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Li X, Thelwall M, editors. F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators; 2012: Science-Metrix and OST Montréal, Canada. Li X, Thelwall M, editors. F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators; 2012: Science-Metrix and OST Montréal, Canada.
23.
go back to reference Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V. Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(4):656–69.CrossRef Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V. Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(4):656–69.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Boyack KW, Klavans R, editors. Predicting the importance of current papers. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics; 2005: Karolinska University Press Stockholm. Boyack KW, Klavans R, editors. Predicting the importance of current papers. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics; 2005: Karolinska University Press Stockholm.
25.
go back to reference Didegah F, Bowman TD, Holmberg K. Increasing our understanding of altmetrics: identifying factors that are driving both citation and altmetric counts. IConference 2016 Proceedings. 2016. Didegah F, Bowman TD, Holmberg K. Increasing our understanding of altmetrics: identifying factors that are driving both citation and altmetric counts. IConference 2016 Proceedings. 2016.
Metadata
Title
Evaluating obesity publications: from bibliometrics to altmetrics
Authors
Azadeh Aletaha
Akbar Soltani
Firoozeh Dokhani
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keywords
Obesity
Obesity
Published in
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2251-6581
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00758-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue