Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Ophthalmology and Therapy 2/2019

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Vitrectomy | Original Research

Outcomes after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

Authors: Josef Guber, Ioana Pereni, Hendrik P. N. Scholl, Ivo Guber, Richard J. Haynes

Published in: Ophthalmology and Therapy | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of persistent postoperative cystoid macular edema (pCME) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane peel (ERM) only versus those with ERM peel combined with internal limiting membrane peel (ILM). Secondary endpoints of the study were to review both the central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity.

Methods

The patients were divided in two groups, one group in which only the ERM was peeled (n = 36 patients) and another group in which both the ERM and the ILM were removed (n = 62 patients). The results were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient received a complete ophthalmological examination, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using an ETDRS chart and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, at three time points: prior to surgery and 3 weeks and 3 months after surgery.

Results

A total 98 eyes of 98 patients were included in this study. The mean follow-up time was 7.7 months. CMT decreased significantly after surgery in all patients, and none of these changes differed significantly between the two groups. The BCVA increased significantly after surgery across all patients, and there were no significant changes between the two treatment groups. Postoperative pCME occurred in eight patients in each group, representing 22.2% of the 36 patients in the ERM only group and 12.9% of the 62 patients in the ERM/ILM peel group. However, this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

No difference was found between the two groups in terms of incidence of pCME. Both groups experienced had similar decrease in the CMT and improvement in the BCVA postoperatively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller B. Epiretinal macular membranes: pathogenesis and treatment. Dev Ophthalmol. 1997;29:61–3.CrossRef Miller B. Epiretinal macular membranes: pathogenesis and treatment. Dev Ophthalmol. 1997;29:61–3.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Guidry C. The role of Müller cells in fibrocontractive retinal disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24(1):75–6.CrossRef Guidry C. The role of Müller cells in fibrocontractive retinal disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24(1):75–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Geerts L, Pertile G, Sompel van de W. Vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes: visual outcome and prognostic criteria. Bull Soc Belg Ophtalmol. 2004;293:7–15. Geerts L, Pertile G, Sompel van de W. Vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes: visual outcome and prognostic criteria. Bull Soc Belg Ophtalmol. 2004;293:7–15.
4.
go back to reference Kwok AKH, Lai Tyy, Yuen KSC. Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(4):379–85.CrossRef Kwok AKH, Lai Tyy, Yuen KSC. Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(4):379–85.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bovey Eh, Uffer Achache F. Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome. Retina. 2004;24(5):728–35.CrossRef Bovey Eh, Uffer Achache F. Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome. Retina. 2004;24(5):728–35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hasegawa T, Emi K, Ikeda T. Long-term prognosis of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2004;108(3):150–56.PubMed Hasegawa T, Emi K, Ikeda T. Long-term prognosis of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi. 2004;108(3):150–56.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kenawy K, Wong D, Stappler T. Does the presence of an epiretinal membrane alter the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane peeling? Ophthalmology. 2010;117(2):320–323.e1.CrossRef Kenawy K, Wong D, Stappler T. Does the presence of an epiretinal membrane alter the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane peeling? Ophthalmology. 2010;117(2):320–323.e1.CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Abo El, Enin M, El-Toukhy H, Swelam A. Non-foveal macular holes after PPV for macular pucker. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17(3):254.CrossRef Abo El, Enin M, El-Toukhy H, Swelam A. Non-foveal macular holes after PPV for macular pucker. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17(3):254.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee JW, Kim IT. Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(2):129–34.CrossRef Lee JW, Kim IT. Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010;54(2):129–34.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2279–2283.CrossRef Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2279–2283.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baba T, Yamamoto S, Kimoto R. Reduction of thickness of ganglion cell complex after internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Eye. 2012;26(9):1173–80.CrossRef Baba T, Yamamoto S, Kimoto R. Reduction of thickness of ganglion cell complex after internal limiting membrane peeling during vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Eye. 2012;26(9):1173–80.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1370–76.CrossRef Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1370–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Oh HN, Lee JE, Kim KW. Clinical outcomes of double staining and additional ILM peeling during ERM surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(4):256–60.CrossRef Oh HN, Lee JE, Kim KW. Clinical outcomes of double staining and additional ILM peeling during ERM surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(4):256–60.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Morris R, Kuhn F, Witherspoon CD. Hemorrhagic macular cysts in Terson’s syndrome and its implications for macular surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 1997;29:44–54.CrossRef Morris R, Kuhn F, Witherspoon CD. Hemorrhagic macular cysts in Terson’s syndrome and its implications for macular surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 1997;29:44–54.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Terson syndrome: results of vitrectomy and the significance of vitreous hemorrhage in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(3):472–77.CrossRef Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Terson syndrome: results of vitrectomy and the significance of vitreous hemorrhage in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(3):472–77.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuhn F. Point: to peel or not to peel, that is the question. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(1):9–11.CrossRef Kuhn F. Point: to peel or not to peel, that is the question. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(1):9–11.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gibran SK. Flemming B, Stappler T. Peel and peel again. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(3):373–77.CrossRef Gibran SK. Flemming B, Stappler T. Peel and peel again. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(3):373–77.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kwok AKH, Lai TTY, Li WWY. Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery: a clinical and histologic study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):194–99.CrossRef Kwok AKH, Lai TTY, Li WWY. Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery: a clinical and histologic study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):194–99.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kwok AKH, Lai TTY, Li WWY, Yew DTW et al. Trypan blue- and indocyanine green-assisted epiretinal membrane surgery: clinical and histopathological studies. Eye. 2004;18(9):882–88.CrossRef Kwok AKH, Lai TTY, Li WWY, Yew DTW et al. Trypan blue- and indocyanine green-assisted epiretinal membrane surgery: clinical and histopathological studies. Eye. 2004;18(9):882–88.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sivalingam A, Eagle RC Jr, Duker JS. Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(11):1549–52.CrossRef Sivalingam A, Eagle RC Jr, Duker JS. Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 1990;97(11):1549–52.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Spaide RF. "Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance" after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina. 2012;32(9):1719–26.CrossRef Spaide RF. "Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance" after internal limiting membrane removal is inner retinal dimpling. Retina. 2012;32(9):1719–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
Authors
Josef Guber
Ioana Pereni
Hendrik P. N. Scholl
Ivo Guber
Richard J. Haynes
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Ophthalmology and Therapy / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2193-8245
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6528
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0185-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Ophthalmology and Therapy 2/2019 Go to the issue