Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Infectious Diseases and Therapy 2/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Review

Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: from FOCUS to CAPTURE

Authors: Joseph J. Carreno, Thomas P. Lodise

Published in: Infectious Diseases and Therapy | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Ceftaroline fosamil (ceftaroline hereafter) is the latest addition to the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), which is a recent FDA indication that centers on individuals with documented bacterial pneumonias that arise in the community setting. The purpose of this review is to summarize and discuss the major findings from the Phase III CAP clinical trials as well as the clinical experience with ceftaroline among patients with CAP in the “Ceftaroline Assessment Program and Teflaro® Utilization Registry” (CAPTURE). In its two Phase III CAP trials, ceftaroline was compared to ceftriaxone among adults with radiographically confirmed CAP requiring hospitalization who were classified as Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III or IV. Among patients with CAP, clinical success at test of cure was 84.3% vs 77.7% (difference 6.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–11.8%) in those treated with ceftaroline and ceftriaxone, respectively, across the two Phase III clinical trials. Among patients with a culture-confirmed CABP, day 4 response rates were numerically higher, albeit non-significant, among patients that received ceftaroline vs. ceftriaxone (69.5% for ceftaroline vs. 59.4% for ceftriaxone, difference 10.1%, 95% CI, −0.6% to 20.6%). The efficacy of ceftaroline is supported by real-world observational data from CAPTURE for patients with both CAP and CABP. In addition, the CAPTURE program afforded an opportunity to assess the outcomes of patients who were excluded or limited in the original Phase III trials in a non-comparative fashion. These underrepresented patient populations with CAP included: patients that received prior antibiotics, patients in the ICU, patients with severe renal dysfunction, and those with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from respiratory or blood culture. As CAPTURE is a retrospective, non-comparator convenience sample registry, all the findings need to be interpreted with caution.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Teflaro (ceftaroline fosamil) [full prescribing information]. New York: Forest Laboratories; 2010. Teflaro (ceftaroline fosamil) [full prescribing information]. New York: Forest Laboratories; 2010.
2.
go back to reference File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:1395–405.PubMedCrossRef File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. Integrated analysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, doubled-blinded, multicenter phase 3 trials of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:1395–405.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl 3:iii):19–32. File TM Jr, Low DE, Eckburg PB, et al. FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl 3:iii):19–32.
4.
go back to reference Low DE, File TM Jr, Eckburg PB, et al. FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl 3:iii):33–44. Low DE, File TM Jr, Eckburg PB, et al. FOCUS 2: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(Suppl 3:iii):33–44.
5.
go back to reference Huang X, Jandourek A, Cole P, Friedland D. Current use of ceftaroline for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (cabp) in us hospitals: length of stay and total cost from the capture study. Chest J. 2013;144:259A-A.CrossRef Huang X, Jandourek A, Cole P, Friedland D. Current use of ceftaroline for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (cabp) in us hospitals: length of stay and total cost from the capture study. Chest J. 2013;144:259A-A.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jandourek A, Udeani G, Smith A, Friedland HD. CAPTURE Study experience in patients with community acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and treatment with ceftaroline. European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Berlin, Germany, 2013. Jandourek A, Udeani G, Smith A, Friedland HD. CAPTURE Study experience in patients with community acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and treatment with ceftaroline. European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Berlin, Germany, 2013.
7.
go back to reference Maggiore C, Pasquale T, Cole P, Smith A, Friedland HD. Ceftaroline fosamil for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections or community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in patients with renal insufficiency: CAPTURE study experience. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists’ Midyear Meeting. Orlando: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2013. Maggiore C, Pasquale T, Cole P, Smith A, Friedland HD. Ceftaroline fosamil for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections or community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in patients with renal insufficiency: CAPTURE study experience. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists’ Midyear Meeting. Orlando: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Maggiore C, Pasquale T, Jandourek A, Smith A, Friedland HD. Experience with ceftaroline fosamil as monotherapy and combination therapy with vancomycin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. ASHP Midyear Meeting 2013 Orlando, FL American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2013. p. 5–112. Maggiore C, Pasquale T, Jandourek A, Smith A, Friedland HD. Experience with ceftaroline fosamil as monotherapy and combination therapy with vancomycin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. ASHP Midyear Meeting 2013 Orlando, FL American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2013. p. 5–112.
9.
go back to reference Udeani G, Evans J, Jandourek A, Friedland HD. Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): CAPTURE Year 1 (H 46). American Thoracic Society International Conference. Philadelphia, PA, 2013. Udeani G, Evans J, Jandourek A, Friedland HD. Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): CAPTURE Year 1 (H 46). American Thoracic Society International Conference. Philadelphia, PA, 2013.
10.
go back to reference Udeani G, Evans J, Jandourek A, Friedland HD. CAPTURE: Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Year 1. A49 community acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia: treatment and outcomes. American Thoracic Society; 2013. p. A1688-A. Udeani G, Evans J, Jandourek A, Friedland HD. CAPTURE: Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Year 1. A49 community acquired pneumonia and healthcare-associated pneumonia: treatment and outcomes. American Thoracic Society; 2013. p. A1688-A.
11.
go back to reference van Hal SJ, Fowler VG, Jr. Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections? Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2013;56:1779–88. van Hal SJ, Fowler VG, Jr. Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections? Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2013;56:1779–88.
12.
go back to reference Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, et al. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2012;54:621–9.CrossRef Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, et al. Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2012;54:621–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, et al. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2003;37:1405–33.CrossRef Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, et al. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2003;37:1405–33.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27–72.CrossRef Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2007;44(Suppl 2):S27–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, et al. Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2008;46:1142–51.CrossRef Pertel PE, Bernardo P, Fogarty C, et al. Effects of prior effective therapy on the efficacy of daptomycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2008;46:1142–51.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bartlett JG. Diagnostic tests for agents of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2011;52(Suppl 4):S296–304.CrossRef Bartlett JG. Diagnostic tests for agents of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2011;52(Suppl 4):S296–304.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243–50.PubMedCrossRef Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243–50.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–85. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–85.
21.
go back to reference Eckberg PB, Friedland DH, Llorens L, et al. Day 4 clinical response of ceftaroline fosamil versus cefriaxone for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2012;20:254–60.CrossRef Eckberg PB, Friedland DH, Llorens L, et al. Day 4 clinical response of ceftaroline fosamil versus cefriaxone for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2012;20:254–60.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moisan H, Pruneau M, Malouin F. Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:713–6.PubMedCrossRef Moisan H, Pruneau M, Malouin F. Binding of ceftaroline to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:713–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zhanel GG, Yachison C, Nichol K, et al. Assessment of the activity of ceftaroline against clinical isolates of penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated MICs of ceftaroline using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1706–11.PubMedCrossRef Zhanel GG, Yachison C, Nichol K, et al. Assessment of the activity of ceftaroline against clinical isolates of penicillin-intermediate and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae with elevated MICs of ceftaroline using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:1706–11.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ramani A, Udeani G, Evans J, et al. Contemporary use of ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: CAPTURE study experience. J Chemother. 2014 (1973947814Y0000000184). Ramani A, Udeani G, Evans J, et al. Contemporary use of ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: CAPTURE study experience. J Chemother. 2014 (1973947814Y0000000184).
25.
go back to reference van Hal SJ, Paterson DL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the significance of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:405–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef van Hal SJ, Paterson DL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the significance of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:405–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: from FOCUS to CAPTURE
Authors
Joseph J. Carreno
Thomas P. Lodise
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Infectious Diseases and Therapy / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2193-8229
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6382
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0036-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Infectious Diseases and Therapy 2/2014 Go to the issue