Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 2/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Letter

Authors’ Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: A Comprehensive Review on Copemyl®

Authors: Pietro Annovazzi, Antonio Bertolotto, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Claudio Gasperini, Enrico Montanari, Pierluigi Navarra, Francesco Patti, Maria Pia Sormani, Angelo Ghezzi

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read with interest the letter by Comi et al. [1] in response to our review [2]. In the still complex therapeutic landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS), more complexity was added by the controversy following the commercialization of Copemyl®, at times perplexing neurologists in their clinical practice. We thank Comi et al. for having provided additional information on the intricate question of possible differences between glatiramer acetate (GA) and glatiramoids. Indeed some references were not included in our review, e.g., some abstracts and papers not available as the full text. …
Metadata
Title
Authors’ Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: A Comprehensive Review on Copemyl®
Authors
Pietro Annovazzi
Antonio Bertolotto
Vincenzo Brescia Morra
Claudio Gasperini
Enrico Montanari
Pierluigi Navarra
Francesco Patti
Maria Pia Sormani
Angelo Ghezzi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-018-0116-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Neurology and Therapy 2/2018 Go to the issue