Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 2/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Review

A Comprehensive Review on Copemyl®

Authors: Pietro Annovazzi, Antonio Bertolotto, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Claudio Gasperini, Enrico Montanari, Pierluigi Navarra, Francesco Patti, Maria Pia Sormani, Angelo Ghezzi

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Economic sustainability is of paramount importance in the rapidly evolving therapeutic scenario of multiple sclerosis (MS). Glatiramoids are a class of drugs whose forefather, glatiramer acetate, has been used as a disease modifying drug (DMD) in patients with MS for over 20 years. Its patent expired in 2015; new versions of such drug are nowadays available on the market, potentially contributing to lowering prices and enhancing a better allocation of economic resources. In this review, we analyze the recommendations underlying the approval of both generic drugs and biosimilars by regulatory authorities, and we provide methodological tools to contextualize the design of studies on these new classes of drugs. We examine in more detail the preclinical and clinical data of Copemyl®, a new member of the glatiramoid class, focusing on its biological and immunological properties and illustrating randomized controlled trials that led to its authorization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson KP. Glatiramer acetate and the glatiramoid class of immunomodulator drugs in multiple sclerosis: an update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6(5):643–60.CrossRefPubMed Johnson KP. Glatiramer acetate and the glatiramoid class of immunomodulator drugs in multiple sclerosis: an update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010;6(5):643–60.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Comi G, Amato MP, Bertolotto A, et al. The heritage of glatiramer acetate and its use in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Demyelin Disord. 2016;1:6.CrossRef Comi G, Amato MP, Bertolotto A, et al. The heritage of glatiramer acetate and its use in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Demyelin Disord. 2016;1:6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arnon R. The development of Cop 1 (Copaxone), an innovative drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: personal reflections. Immunol Lett. 1996;50(1–2):1–15.CrossRefPubMed Arnon R. The development of Cop 1 (Copaxone), an innovative drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: personal reflections. Immunol Lett. 1996;50(1–2):1–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Teitelbaum D, Meshorer A, Hirshfeld T, Arnon R, Sela M. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a synthetic polypeptide. Eur J Immunol. 1971;1(4):242–8.CrossRefPubMed Teitelbaum D, Meshorer A, Hirshfeld T, Arnon R, Sela M. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a synthetic polypeptide. Eur J Immunol. 1971;1(4):242–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Aharoni R, Teitelbaum D, Sela M, Arnon R. Bystander suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by T cell lines and clones of the Th2 type induced by copolymer 1. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;91(1–2):135–46.CrossRefPubMed Aharoni R, Teitelbaum D, Sela M, Arnon R. Bystander suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by T cell lines and clones of the Th2 type induced by copolymer 1. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;91(1–2):135–46.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Oreja-Guevara C, Ramos-Cejudo J, Aroeira LS, Chamorro B, Diez-Tejedor E. TH1/TH2 cytokine profile in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate or natalizumab. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oreja-Guevara C, Ramos-Cejudo J, Aroeira LS, Chamorro B, Diez-Tejedor E. TH1/TH2 cytokine profile in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate or natalizumab. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Haas J, Korporal M, Balint B, Fritzsching B, Schwarz A, Wildemann B. Glatiramer acetate improves regulatory T-cell function by expansion of naïve CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD31(+) T-cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;216(1–2):113–7.CrossRefPubMed Haas J, Korporal M, Balint B, Fritzsching B, Schwarz A, Wildemann B. Glatiramer acetate improves regulatory T-cell function by expansion of naïve CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+)CD31(+) T-cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;216(1–2):113–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Aharoni R, Eilam R, Stock A, et al. Glatiramer acetate reduces Th-17 inflammation and induces regulatory T-cells in the CNS of mice with relapsing-remitting or chronic EAE. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;225(1–2):100–11.CrossRefPubMed Aharoni R, Eilam R, Stock A, et al. Glatiramer acetate reduces Th-17 inflammation and induces regulatory T-cells in the CNS of mice with relapsing-remitting or chronic EAE. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;225(1–2):100–11.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Arnon R, Aharoni R. Neurogenesis and neuroprotection in the CNS–fundamental elements in the effect of glatiramer acetate on treatment of autoimmune neurological disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2007;36(3):245–53.CrossRefPubMed Arnon R, Aharoni R. Neurogenesis and neuroprotection in the CNS–fundamental elements in the effect of glatiramer acetate on treatment of autoimmune neurological disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2007;36(3):245–53.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Skihar V, Silva C, Chojnacki A, et al. Promoting oligodendrogenesis and myelin repair using the multiple sclerosis medication glatiramer acetate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(42):17992–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Skihar V, Silva C, Chojnacki A, et al. Promoting oligodendrogenesis and myelin repair using the multiple sclerosis medication glatiramer acetate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(42):17992–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Gentile A, Rossi S, Studer V, et al. Glatiramer acetate protects against inflammatory synaptopathy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8(3):651–63.CrossRefPubMed Gentile A, Rossi S, Studer V, et al. Glatiramer acetate protects against inflammatory synaptopathy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8(3):651–63.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Farina C, Vargas V, Heydari N, Kumpfel T, Meinl E, Hohlfeld R. Treatment with glatiramer acetate induces specific IgG4 antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;123(1–2):188–92.CrossRefPubMed Farina C, Vargas V, Heydari N, Kumpfel T, Meinl E, Hohlfeld R. Treatment with glatiramer acetate induces specific IgG4 antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;123(1–2):188–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Johnson KP, Teitelbaum D, Arnon R, The US Phase III Copolymer 1 Study Group, et al. Antibodies to copolymer do not interfere with its clinical effect. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:973. Johnson KP, Teitelbaum D, Arnon R, The US Phase III Copolymer 1 Study Group, et al. Antibodies to copolymer do not interfere with its clinical effect. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:973.
14.
go back to reference Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1268–76.CrossRefPubMed Johnson KP, Brooks BR, Cohen JA, et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1268–76.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Comi G, Filippi M, Wolinsky JS, European/Canadian Glatiramer Acetate Study Group. European/Canadian multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of glatiramer acetate on magnetic resonance imaging–measured disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):290–7.CrossRefPubMed Comi G, Filippi M, Wolinsky JS, European/Canadian Glatiramer Acetate Study Group. European/Canadian multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of glatiramer acetate on magnetic resonance imaging–measured disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):290–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference EU Definition (Directive 2001/83/EC, Annex I (=Directive 2003/63/EC)) of a biological medicinal product. EU Definition (Directive 2001/83/EC, Annex I (=Directive 2003/63/EC)) of a biological medicinal product.
17.
go back to reference Schellekens H, Klinger E, Mühlebach S, Brin JF, Storm G, Crommelin DJ. The therapeutic equivalence of complex drugs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;59(1):176–83.CrossRefPubMed Schellekens H, Klinger E, Mühlebach S, Brin JF, Storm G, Crommelin DJ. The therapeutic equivalence of complex drugs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;59(1):176–83.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Crommelin DJ, Shah VP, Klebovich I, et al. The similarity question for biologicals and non-biological complex drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;76:10–7.CrossRefPubMed Crommelin DJ, Shah VP, Klebovich I, et al. The similarity question for biologicals and non-biological complex drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;76:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Crommelin DJ, Bermejo T, Bissig M, et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of biosimilars: important differences from generic low-molecular weight pharmaceuticals. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci. 2005;1:11–7. Crommelin DJ, Bermejo T, Bissig M, et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of biosimilars: important differences from generic low-molecular weight pharmaceuticals. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci. 2005;1:11–7.
20.
go back to reference Schellekens H. Follow-on biologics: challenges of the ‘next generation’. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:31–6.CrossRef Schellekens H. Follow-on biologics: challenges of the ‘next generation’. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:31–6.CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference EMA: decentralised procedure RMS final assessment report. CMDh/200/2007 Rev. 5 December 2013. EMA: decentralised procedure RMS final assessment report. CMDh/200/2007 Rev. 5 December 2013.
25.
go back to reference Wellek S, Blettner M. Establishing equivalence or non-inferiority in clinical trials: part 20 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(41):674–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Wellek S, Blettner M. Establishing equivalence or non-inferiority in clinical trials: part 20 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(41):674–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Njue C. Statistical considerations for confirmatory clinical trials for similar biotherapeutic products. Biologicals. 2011;39(5):266–9.CrossRefPubMed Njue C. Statistical considerations for confirmatory clinical trials for similar biotherapeutic products. Biologicals. 2011;39(5):266–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG) public assessment report (PAR) Scientific discussion Glatirameeracetaat Mylan 20 mg/ml, solution for injection, pre-filled syringe (glatiramer acetate) NL/H/3213/001/DC. 6 June 2016. College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG) public assessment report (PAR) Scientific discussion Glatirameeracetaat Mylan 20 mg/ml, solution for injection, pre-filled syringe (glatiramer acetate) NL/H/3213/001/DC. 6 June 2016.
28.
go back to reference Arends R. Gene expression analysis between 5 GTR (20 mg/mL) batches and 5 Copaxone® (20 mg/mL) batches in THP-1 cells. Dossier NDR.NL03.39931 (1.0). Arends R. Gene expression analysis between 5 GTR (20 mg/mL) batches and 5 Copaxone® (20 mg/mL) batches in THP-1 cells. Dossier NDR.NL03.39931 (1.0).
29.
go back to reference Weijts F (2010) Research analytical study report on bioactivity of glatiramer acetate (GTR) towards induction and activation of glatiramer-specific T cells. Dossier RASR.NL03.GTR.10.010.01. Weijts F (2010) Research analytical study report on bioactivity of glatiramer acetate (GTR) towards induction and activation of glatiramer-specific T cells. Dossier RASR.NL03.GTR.10.010.01.
30.
go back to reference Aharoni R, Teitelbaum D, Arnon R. T suppressor hybridomas and interleukin-2-dependent lines induced by copolymer 1 or by spinal cord homogenate down-regulate experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:17–25.CrossRefPubMed Aharoni R, Teitelbaum D, Arnon R. T suppressor hybridomas and interleukin-2-dependent lines induced by copolymer 1 or by spinal cord homogenate down-regulate experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23:17–25.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Cohen J, Belova A, Selmaj K, et al. Equivalence of generic glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1433–41.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J, Belova A, Selmaj K, et al. Equivalence of generic glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1433–41.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
go back to reference Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444–52.CrossRefPubMed Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444–52.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Sormani MP, Bonzano L, Roccatagliata L, Cutter GR, Mancardi GL, Bruzzi P. Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(3):268–75.CrossRefPubMed Sormani MP, Bonzano L, Roccatagliata L, Cutter GR, Mancardi GL, Bruzzi P. Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Ann Neurol. 2009;65(3):268–75.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Sormani MP, Bruzzi P. MRI lesions as a surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(7):669–76.CrossRefPubMed Sormani MP, Bruzzi P. MRI lesions as a surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(7):669–76.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials. ICH Topic E 2000; 10. Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials. ICH Topic E 2000; 10.
37.
go back to reference Tóthfalusi L, Endrényi L, Chow SC. Statistical and regulatory considerations in assessments of interchangeability of biological drug products. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:S5–11.CrossRefPubMed Tóthfalusi L, Endrényi L, Chow SC. Statistical and regulatory considerations in assessments of interchangeability of biological drug products. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:S5–11.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Wu LC, Chen F, Lee SL, Raw A, Yu LX. Building parity between brand and generic peptide products: regulatory and scientific considerations for quality of synthetic peptides. Int J Pharm. 2017;518(1–2):320–34.CrossRefPubMed Wu LC, Chen F, Lee SL, Raw A, Yu LX. Building parity between brand and generic peptide products: regulatory and scientific considerations for quality of synthetic peptides. Int J Pharm. 2017;518(1–2):320–34.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Mikol DD, Barkhof F, Chang P, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a with glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (the REbif vs glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS disease [REGARD] study): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):903–14.CrossRefPubMed Mikol DD, Barkhof F, Chang P, et al. Comparison of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a with glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (the REbif vs glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS disease [REGARD] study): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):903–14.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference O’Connor P, Filippi M, Arnason B, et al. 250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(10):889–97.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor P, Filippi M, Arnason B, et al. 250 microg or 500 microg interferon beta-1b versus 20 mg glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(10):889–97.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Lublin FD, Cofield SS, Cutter GR, et al. Randomized study combining interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2013;73(3):327–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lublin FD, Cofield SS, Cutter GR, et al. Randomized study combining interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2013;73(3):327–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference La Mantia L, Di Pietrantonj C, Rovaris M, et al. Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;24:11. La Mantia L, Di Pietrantonj C, Rovaris M, et al. Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;24:11.
44.
go back to reference Sørensen PS. Multiple sclerosis. Generic glatiramer acetate—a step toward cheaper MS drugs? Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(1):5–6.CrossRefPubMed Sørensen PS. Multiple sclerosis. Generic glatiramer acetate—a step toward cheaper MS drugs? Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(1):5–6.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Stellmann JP, Neuhaus A, Herich L et al. Placebo cohorts in phase-3 MS treatment trials—predictors for on-trial disease activity 1990–2010 based on a meta-analysis and individual case data. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50347. Stellmann JP, Neuhaus A, Herich L et al. Placebo cohorts in phase-3 MS treatment trials—predictors for on-trial disease activity 1990–2010 based on a meta-analysis and individual case data. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50347.
46.
go back to reference Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9700):1503–11.CrossRefPubMed Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9700):1503–11.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Bourdette D, Hartung D. Equivalence of glatiramer acetate generics with branded glatiramer acetate in efficacy and cost for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1411–3.CrossRefPubMed Bourdette D, Hartung D. Equivalence of glatiramer acetate generics with branded glatiramer acetate in efficacy and cost for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1411–3.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Garattini L, Padula A. Why EMA should provide clearer guidance on the authorization of NBCDs in generic and hybrid applications. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017;10(3):243–5.PubMed Garattini L, Padula A. Why EMA should provide clearer guidance on the authorization of NBCDs in generic and hybrid applications. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017;10(3):243–5.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Crommelin DJ, de Vlieger JS, Weinstein V, et al. Different pharmaceutical products need similar terminology. AAPS J. 2014;16(1):11–4.CrossRefPubMed Crommelin DJ, de Vlieger JS, Weinstein V, et al. Different pharmaceutical products need similar terminology. AAPS J. 2014;16(1):11–4.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Nicholas JM. Complex drugs and biologics: scientific and regulatory challenges for follow-on products. Drug Inf J. 2012;46(2):197–206.CrossRef Nicholas JM. Complex drugs and biologics: scientific and regulatory challenges for follow-on products. Drug Inf J. 2012;46(2):197–206.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comprehensive Review on Copemyl®
Authors
Pietro Annovazzi
Antonio Bertolotto
Vincenzo Brescia Morra
Claudio Gasperini
Enrico Montanari
Pierluigi Navarra
Francesco Patti
Maria Pia Sormani
Angelo Ghezzi
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-017-0079-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Neurology and Therapy 2/2017 Go to the issue