Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Eye-Opener

Science: the slow march of accumulating evidence

Authors: Katherine Picho, Lauren A. Maggio, Anthony R. Artino Jr

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Recent crises over the credibility of research in psychology and the biomedical sciences have highlighted the need for researchers to view and treat replication research as essential to the accumulation of knowledge. In this article, the authors make the case for the utility of replication in medical education research. Specifically, the authors contend that because research in medical education often adopts theories from other disciplines, replication is necessary to gauge the applicability of those theories to the specific medical education context. This article introduces readers to the two major types of replication – direct and conceptual – and provides a primer on conceptual replication. In particular, the article presents key elements of conceptual replication and considers how it can be used to strengthen approaches to knowledge generation, theory testing, and theory development in medical education research.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. Plos Med. 2005;2:e124.CrossRef Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. Plos Med. 2005;2:e124.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schmidt S. Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in social sciences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13:90–100.CrossRef Schmidt S. Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in social sciences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13:90–100.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Norman G. Editorial – how bad is medical education research anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12:1–5.CrossRef Norman G. Editorial – how bad is medical education research anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12:1–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eva KW. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ. 2009;43:294–6.CrossRef Eva KW. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ. 2009;43:294–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Larson DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Test enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:959–66.CrossRef Larson DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Test enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42:959–66.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Earp BD, Trafimow D. Replication, falsification and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–11.CrossRef Earp BD, Trafimow D. Replication, falsification and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–11.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Klein SB. What can recent replication failures tell us about theoretical commitments of psychology? Theory Psychol. 2014;24:326–38.CrossRef Klein SB. What can recent replication failures tell us about theoretical commitments of psychology? Theory Psychol. 2014;24:326–38.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pashler H, Harris CR. Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:531–6.CrossRef Pashler H, Harris CR. Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:531–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Science: the slow march of accumulating evidence
Authors
Katherine Picho
Lauren A. Maggio
Anthony R. Artino Jr
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0305-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2016 Go to the issue

Statistical Points and Pitfalls

Effect size – large, medium, and small

Thanks to Reviewers

Thanks to reviewers