Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Guidelines

Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education

Authors: Janet Lefroy, Chris Watling, Pim W. Teunissen, Paul Brand

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The guidelines offered in this paper aim to amalgamate the literature on formative feedback into practical Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows for individual clinical supervisors and for the institutions that support clinical learning.

Methods

The authors built consensus by an iterative process. Do’s and Don’ts were proposed based on authors’ individual teaching experience and awareness of the literature, and the amalgamated set of guidelines were then refined by all authors and the evidence was summarized for each guideline. Don’t Knows were identified as being important questions to this international group of educators which if answered would change practice. The criteria for inclusion of evidence for these guidelines were not those of a systematic review, so indicators of strength of these recommendations were developed which combine the evidence with the authors’ consensus.

Results

A set of 32 Do and Don’t guidelines with the important Don’t Knows was compiled along with a summary of the evidence for each. These are divided into guidelines for the individual clinical supervisor giving feedback to their trainee (recommendations about both the process and the content of feedback) and guidelines for the learning culture (what elements of learning culture support the exchange of meaningful feedback, and what elements constrain it?)

Conclusion

Feedback is not easy to get right, but it is essential to learning in medicine, and there is a wealth of evidence supporting the Do’s and warning against the Don’ts. Further research into the critical Don’t Knows of feedback is required. A new definition is offered: Helpful feedback is a supportive conversation that clarifies the trainee’s awareness of their developing competencies, enhances their self-efficacy for making progress, challenges them to set objectives for improvement, and facilitates their development of strategies to enable that improvement to occur.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Evans C. Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Rev Educ Res. 2013;83:70–120.CrossRef Evans C. Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Rev Educ Res. 2013;83:70–120.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17:15–26.CrossRef Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17:15–26.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sargeant J, Mann K, Vleuten C van der, Metsemakers J. ‘Directed’ self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:47–54.CrossRef Sargeant J, Mann K, Vleuten C van der, Metsemakers J. ‘Directed’ self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:47–54.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, Van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47:585–94.CrossRef Watling C, Driessen E, Van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47:585–94.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42:189–97.CrossRef Van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42:189–97.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Teunissen PW. Experience, trajectories, and reifications: an emerging framework of practice-based learning in healthcare workplaces. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2015;20:843–56.CrossRef Teunissen PW. Experience, trajectories, and reifications: an emerging framework of practice-based learning in healthcare workplaces. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2015;20:843–56.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bing-You RG, Paterson J. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach. 1997;19:40.CrossRef Bing-You RG, Paterson J. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach. 1997;19:40.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ. 2005;39:497–504.CrossRef Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ. 2005;39:497–504.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van Der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ. 2007;41:583–91.CrossRef Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van Der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ. 2007;41:583–91.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ. 2012;46:192–200.CrossRef Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ. 2012;46:192–200.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Watling C, Kenyon C, Zibrowski E, et al. Rules of engagement: residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med. 2008;83(10 Suppl):S97–100.CrossRef Watling C, Kenyon C, Zibrowski E, et al. Rules of engagement: residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med. 2008;83(10 Suppl):S97–100.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Walsh C, Ling S, Carnahan H. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 2009;84(10 Suppl):S54–7.CrossRef Walsh C, Ling S, Carnahan H. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 2009;84(10 Suppl):S54–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112.CrossRef Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.( John Wiley & Sons, Ltd) Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.( John Wiley & Sons, Ltd)
15.
go back to reference Higgins E. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 1–46. Higgins E. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 1–46.
16.
go back to reference Tuckey M, Brewer N, Williamson P. The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75:195–216.CrossRef Tuckey M, Brewer N, Williamson P. The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75:195–216.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Teunissen PW, Bok HGJ. Believing is seeing: how people’s beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Educ. 2013;47:1064–72.CrossRef Teunissen PW, Bok HGJ. Believing is seeing: how people’s beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Educ. 2013;47:1064–72.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Morrison E, Cummings L. The impact of feedback diagnosticity and performance expectations on feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Perform. 1992;5:251–64.CrossRef Morrison E, Cummings L. The impact of feedback diagnosticity and performance expectations on feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Perform. 1992;5:251–64.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tsui AS, Ashford SJ. Adaptive self-regulation: a process view of managerial effectiveness. J Manage. 1994;20(1):93–121. Tsui AS, Ashford SJ. Adaptive self-regulation: a process view of managerial effectiveness. J Manage. 1994;20(1):93–121.
20.
go back to reference Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, Vleuten CPM van der, Scherpbier AJJA, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback- seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009;84:910.CrossRef Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, Vleuten CPM van der, Scherpbier AJJA, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback- seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009;84:910.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Molloy E, Boud D. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Med Educ. 2013;47:227–9.CrossRef Molloy E, Boud D. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Med Educ. 2013;47:227–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ. 2013;38:698–712.CrossRef Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ. 2013;38:698–712.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Van de Ridder JMM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OTJ. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review. Med Educ. 2015;49:658–73.CrossRef Van de Ridder JMM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OTJ. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review. Med Educ. 2015;49:658–73.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hewson M, Little M. Giving feedback in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:111.CrossRef Hewson M, Little M. Giving feedback in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:111.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Med Educ. 2012;46:593–603.CrossRef Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Med Educ. 2012;46:593–603.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lefroy J, Hawarden A, Gay SP, McKinley RK, Cleland J. Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why. Med Educ. 2015;49:307–20.CrossRef Lefroy J, Hawarden A, Gay SP, McKinley RK, Cleland J. Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why. Med Educ. 2015;49:307–20.CrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Kluger A, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254.CrossRef Kluger A, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Weston PSJ, Smith CA. The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility. Med Teach. 2014;36:155–63.CrossRef Weston PSJ, Smith CA. The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility. Med Teach. 2014;36:155–63.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goodman JS, Wood RE, Hendrickx M. Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:248–62.CrossRef Goodman JS, Wood RE, Hendrickx M. Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:248–62.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Vleuten C van der, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Heal Sci Educ Theory Pr. 2008;13:275–88.CrossRef Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Vleuten C van der, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Heal Sci Educ Theory Pr. 2008;13:275–88.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44:101–8.CrossRef Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44:101–8.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Higgins E. Making a good decision: value from fit. Am Psychol. 2000;55:1215.CrossRef Higgins E. Making a good decision: value from fit. Am Psychol. 2000;55:1215.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kluger A, Van Dijk A. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010;44:1166.CrossRef Kluger A, Van Dijk A. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010;44:1166.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, et al. Clarifying students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47:282–91.CrossRef Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, et al. Clarifying students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47:282–91.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. The Conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud High Educ. 2002;27:53–64.CrossRef Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. The Conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Stud High Educ. 2002;27:53–64.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sadler DR. Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assess Eval High Educ. 2010;35:535–50.CrossRef Sadler DR. Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assess Eval High Educ. 2010;35:535–50.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 2014;48:713–23.CrossRef Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Lingard L. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 2014;48:713–23.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem-solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17:89–100.CrossRef Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem-solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17:89–100.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Vygotsky L. Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986. Vygotsky L. Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.
41.
go back to reference Smith SE, Tallentire VR, Cameron HS, Wood SM. The effects of contributing to patient care on medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2013;47:1184–96.CrossRef Smith SE, Tallentire VR, Cameron HS, Wood SM. The effects of contributing to patient care on medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2013;47:1184–96.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ. 2011;36:395–407.CrossRef Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ. 2011;36:395–407.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer CF, Spafford MM. A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:603–16.CrossRef Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer CF, Spafford MM. A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:603–16.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sitzmann T, Ely K. A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(3):421.CrossRef Sitzmann T, Ely K. A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(3):421.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Overeem K. “Paying it forward”: performance improvement through feedforward interviews. Med Educ. 2010;44:1159–61.CrossRef Overeem K. “Paying it forward”: performance improvement through feedforward interviews. Med Educ. 2010;44:1159–61.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Fam Pract Manag. 2002;9:43–6. Dohrenwend A. Serving up the feedback sandwich. Fam Pract Manag. 2002;9:43–6.
47.
go back to reference Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The new consultation developing doctor-patient communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The new consultation developing doctor-patient communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:1292–4.CrossRef Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:1292–4.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2005. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2005.
50.
go back to reference Dijksterhuis MGK, Schuwirth LWT, Braat DDM, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1396–402.CrossRef Dijksterhuis MGK, Schuwirth LWT, Braat DDM, Teunissen PW, Scheele F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1396–402.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “Educational Alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90:609–14.CrossRef Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “Educational Alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90:609–14.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Vleuten CP van der, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2008;14:399–410.CrossRef Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Vleuten CP van der, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2008;14:399–410.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Schultz KW, Kirby J, Delva D, et al. Medical students’ and residents’ preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviours for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:12.CrossRef Schultz KW, Kirby J, Delva D, et al. Medical students’ and residents’ preferred site characteristics and preceptor behaviours for learning in the ambulatory setting: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:12.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Minehart R, Rudolph J, Pian-Smith M, Raemar D. Improving faculty feedback to resident trainees during a simulated case. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:160–71.CrossRef Minehart R, Rudolph J, Pian-Smith M, Raemar D. Improving faculty feedback to resident trainees during a simulated case. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:160–71.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Sox CM, Dell M, Phillipi CA, Cabral HJ, Vargas G, Lewin LO. feedback on oral presentations during pediatric clerkships: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014;134:965–71.CrossRef Sox CM, Dell M, Phillipi CA, Cabral HJ, Vargas G, Lewin LO. feedback on oral presentations during pediatric clerkships: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014;134:965–71.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29:855.CrossRef Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29:855.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Lipnevich AA, Smith JK. Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009;15:319–33.CrossRef Lipnevich AA, Smith JK. Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009;15:319–33.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Driessen E, Scheele F. What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research. Med Teach. 2013;35:569–74.CrossRef Driessen E, Scheele F. What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research. Med Teach. 2013;35:569–74.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44:85–93.CrossRef Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44:85–93.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Kalyuga S. Instructional benefits of spoken words: a review of cognitive load factors. Educ Res Rev. 2012;7:145–59.CrossRef Kalyuga S. Instructional benefits of spoken words: a review of cognitive load factors. Educ Res Rev. 2012;7:145–59.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Eraut M. Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Rev Educ. 2007;33:403–22.CrossRef Eraut M. Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Rev Educ. 2007;33:403–22.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Billett S. Toward a workplace pedagogy: guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Educ Q. 2002;53:27–43.CrossRef Billett S. Toward a workplace pedagogy: guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Educ Q. 2002;53:27–43.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference GMC. Tomorrow’s doctors the duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council. 2009. GMC. Tomorrow’s doctors the duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council. 2009.
64.
go back to reference Eva K, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80:46.CrossRef Eva K, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80:46.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Raat J, Kuks J, Cohen-Schotanus J. Learning in clinical practice: stimulating and discouraging response to social comparison. Med Teach. 2010;32:899–904.CrossRef Raat J, Kuks J, Cohen-Schotanus J. Learning in clinical practice: stimulating and discouraging response to social comparison. Med Teach. 2010;32:899–904.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Urquhart LM, Rees CE, Ker JS. Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students’ narratives. Med Educ. 2014;48:189–203.CrossRef Urquhart LM, Rees CE, Ker JS. Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students’ narratives. Med Educ. 2014;48:189–203.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47:362–74.CrossRef Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47:362–74.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger J, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):117.CrossRef Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger J, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):117.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:123.CrossRef Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:123.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Hägg-Martinell A, Hult H, Henriksson P, Kiessling A. Students perceive healthcare as a valuable learning environment when accepted as a part of the workplace community. Educ Heal Chang Learn Pract. 2014;27:15–23. Hägg-Martinell A, Hult H, Henriksson P, Kiessling A. Students perceive healthcare as a valuable learning environment when accepted as a part of the workplace community. Educ Heal Chang Learn Pract. 2014;27:15–23.
71.
go back to reference Lefroy J, Thomas A, Harrison C, et al. Development and face validation of strategies for improving consultation skills. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2014;19:661–85.CrossRef Lefroy J, Thomas A, Harrison C, et al. Development and face validation of strategies for improving consultation skills. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2014;19:661–85.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Jippes E, Steinert Y, Pols J, Achterkamp M, Engelen J van, Brand P. How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors’ adoption of a medical education innovation? An exploratory study. Acad Med. 2013;88:398–404.CrossRef Jippes E, Steinert Y, Pols J, Achterkamp M, Engelen J van, Brand P. How do social networks and faculty development courses affect clinical supervisors’ adoption of a medical education innovation? An exploratory study. Acad Med. 2013;88:398–404.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Jippes E, Van Luijk SJ, Pols J, Achterkamp MC, Brand PLP, Van Engelen JML. Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2012;34:e589–602.CrossRef Jippes E, Van Luijk SJ, Pols J, Achterkamp MC, Brand PLP, Van Engelen JML. Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2012;34:e589–602.CrossRef
74.
go back to reference Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39:309–17.CrossRef Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39:309–17.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33:478–85.CrossRef Schuwirth LWT, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33:478–85.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Driessen EW, Tartwijk J van, Govaerts M, Teunissen P, Vleuten CPM van der. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report. Med Teach. 2012;34:226–31.CrossRef Driessen EW, Tartwijk J van, Govaerts M, Teunissen P, Vleuten CPM van der. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report. Med Teach. 2012;34:226–31.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Bok HGJ, Jaarsma ADC, Spruijt A, Van Beukelen P, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Teunissen PW. Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Med Teach. 2015;00:1–8.(Informa UK Ltd)CrossRef Bok HGJ, Jaarsma ADC, Spruijt A, Van Beukelen P, Van Der Vleuten CPM, Teunissen PW. Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Med Teach. 2015;00:1–8.(Informa UK Ltd)CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Nasca TJ, Weiss KB, Bagian JP. Improving clinical learning environments for for tomorrow ’ s physicians. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2014–6.CrossRef Nasca TJ, Weiss KB, Bagian JP. Improving clinical learning environments for for tomorrow ’ s physicians. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2014–6.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Wearne S, Dornan T, Teunissen PW, Skinner T. General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative review. Med Educ. 2012;46:1161–73.CrossRef Wearne S, Dornan T, Teunissen PW, Skinner T. General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative review. Med Educ. 2012;46:1161–73.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Alves de Lima A, Conde D, Costabel J, Corso J, Vleuten C van der. A laboratory study on the reliability estimations of the mini-CEX. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2013;18:5–13.CrossRef Alves de Lima A, Conde D, Costabel J, Corso J, Vleuten C van der. A laboratory study on the reliability estimations of the mini-CEX. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2013;18:5–13.CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Hammoud MM, Edwards ME, Lyon JA, White C. Is video review of patient encounters an effective tool for medical student learning? A review of the literature. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012;3:19–30.CrossRef Hammoud MM, Edwards ME, Lyon JA, White C. Is video review of patient encounters an effective tool for medical student learning? A review of the literature. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2012;3:19–30.CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Fluit CV, Bolhuis S, Klaassen T, et al. Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: reflection through dialogue. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1485–92.CrossRef Fluit CV, Bolhuis S, Klaassen T, et al. Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: reflection through dialogue. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1485–92.CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Fokkema J, Scheele F, Westerman M, et al. Research reports perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education: a q study focusing on workplace-based assessment. Acad Med. 2014;89:1259–66.CrossRef Fokkema J, Scheele F, Westerman M, et al. Research reports perceived effects of innovations in postgraduate medical education: a q study focusing on workplace-based assessment. Acad Med. 2014;89:1259–66.CrossRef
84.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 2013;47:842–50.CrossRef Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CPM van der, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 2013;47:842–50.CrossRef
85.
go back to reference Boor K, Teunissen PW, Scherpbier AJJA, Vleuten CPM van der, Lande J van de, Scheele F. Residents’ perceptions of the ideal clinical teacher-a qualitative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;140:152–7.CrossRef Boor K, Teunissen PW, Scherpbier AJJA, Vleuten CPM van der, Lande J van de, Scheele F. Residents’ perceptions of the ideal clinical teacher-a qualitative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;140:152–7.CrossRef
86.
go back to reference Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34:205–14.CrossRef Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34:205–14.CrossRef
87.
go back to reference Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0. Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0.
88.
go back to reference Eva KW, Regehr G. Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16:311–29.CrossRef Eva KW, Regehr G. Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16:311–29.CrossRef
89.
go back to reference Gabelica C, Bossche P Van Den, Segers M, Gijselaers W. Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: a review. Educ Res Rev. 2012;7:123–44.CrossRef Gabelica C, Bossche P Van Den, Segers M, Gijselaers W. Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: a review. Educ Res Rev. 2012;7:123–44.CrossRef
91.
go back to reference Cavalcanti RB, Detsky AS. The education and training of future physicianswhy coaches can’t be judges. JAMA. 2011;306:993–4. Cavalcanti RB, Detsky AS. The education and training of future physicianswhy coaches can’t be judges. JAMA. 2011;306:993–4.
92.
go back to reference Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46:201–15.CrossRef Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46:201–15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education
Authors
Janet Lefroy
Chris Watling
Pim W. Teunissen
Paul Brand
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2015 Go to the issue