Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Show and Tell

‘From scared to prepared’: targeted structured induction training during the transition from medical school to foundation doctor

Authors: Natalie S. Blencowe, Clare Van Hamel, Rob Bethune, Rebecca Aspinall

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The risks to patients at August handover time are well known, yet there is no national consensus on the best way to deliver induction programmes for Foundation Year One (F1). The aim of this study was to design, deliver and assess a targeted structured induction programme for new F1 doctors. The induction training programme was designed using educational models of topic analysis informed by results of a survey of F1s and medical students, and the F1 curriculum. Data regarding serious untoward incidents and self-reported preparedness were collected between 2008 and 2010, and rates were compared between those receiving optional (2008) and compulsory (2009 and 2010) training. By delivering targeted education and spending time with the outgoing F1 doctors, 97 % of our new doctors felt adequately prepared for practice. The incidence of self-reported mistakes made by F1s in the first 4 months of their practice fell by 45 % and serious untoward incidents also decreased. Targeted structured induction training addresses final-year medical students’ concerns about their preparedness for practice as junior doctors, and improves patient safety. This study supports the General Medical Council recommendation that targeted structured induction training should be mandatory for all new doctors.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Huckman RS, Barro JR, Cohort Turnover and Productivity: the July phenomenon in Teaching Hospitals. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2005. NBER Working Paper No. 11182. 2005. www.nber.org/papers/w11182. Accessed Aug 2014. Huckman RS, Barro JR, Cohort Turnover and Productivity: the July phenomenon in Teaching Hospitals. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2005. NBER Working Paper No. 11182. 2005. www.​nber.​org/​papers/​w11182. Accessed Aug 2014.
3.
go back to reference General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 1993. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 1993.
4.
go back to reference Cave J, Goldacre M, Lambert T, Woolf K, Jones A, Dacre J. Newly qualified doctors’ views about whether their medical school had trained them well: questionnaire surveys. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:38.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cave J, Goldacre M, Lambert T, Woolf K, Jones A, Dacre J. Newly qualified doctors’ views about whether their medical school had trained them well: questionnaire surveys. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:38.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Paice E, Rutter H, Wetherell M, Winder B, McManus IC. Stressful incidents, stress and coping strategies in the pre-registration house officer year. Med Educ. 2002;36:56–65.CrossRefPubMed Paice E, Rutter H, Wetherell M, Winder B, McManus IC. Stressful incidents, stress and coping strategies in the pre-registration house officer year. Med Educ. 2002;36:56–65.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
‘From scared to prepared’: targeted structured induction training during the transition from medical school to foundation doctor
Authors
Natalie S. Blencowe
Clare Van Hamel
Rob Bethune
Rebecca Aspinall
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0168-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015 Go to the issue