Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Infection 1/2015

Open Access 01-02-2015 | Original Paper

Clinical efficacy of tigecycline used as monotherapy or in combination regimens for complicated infections with documented involvement of multiresistant bacteria

Authors: W. R. Heizmann, P.-A. Löschmann, C. Eckmann, C. von Eiff, K.-F. Bodmann, C. Petrik

Published in: Infection | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Tigecycline is an established treatment option for infections with multiresistant bacteria (MRB). It retains activity against many strains with limited susceptibility to other antibiotics. Efficacy and safety of tigecycline as monotherapy or in combination regimens were investigated in a prospective noninterventional study involving 1,025 severely ill patients in clinical routine at 137 German hospitals.

Materials and methods

Data on the full population have been published; our present analysis focuses on infections caused by MRB. The study population included patients with complicated infections, high disease severity (APACHE II > 15: 65 %) and high MRB prevalence. Most patients had comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and/or diabetes mellitus. Treatment success was defined as cure/improvement without requirement of further antibiotic therapy.

Results

Pathogens isolated from 215 evaluable patients with documented MRB infections included 132 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 42 vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and 67 Gram-negative extended beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. Of the MRB subpopulation, 140 patients received tigecycline monotherapy, 75 were treated with combination regimens. High overall clinical success rates were recorded for MRB infections treated with tigecycline alone (94 %) or in combinations (88 %); in detail intraabdominal infections (monotherapy: 90 %; combinations: 93 %), skin/soft tissue infections (93; 100 %), community-acquired pneumonia (100; 100 %), hospital-acquired pneumonia (94,7; 72,7 %), diabetic foot infections (89; 33 %), blood stream infections (100; 100 %) and multiple-site infections (92; 71 %).

Conclusions

Tigecycline achieved high clinical success rates in patients with documented infections involving MRB strains despite high disease severity. These results add to the evidence indicating that tigecycline is a valuable therapeutic option for complicated infections in severely ill patients with a high likelihood of multidrug-resistant pathogen involvement.
Footnotes
1
Initial dose was not reported in 1 patient; maintenance dose was not reported in 10 patients. The following divergent dosage regimens were reported: initial dose: 50 mg (7 patients), 70 mg (1), 2 x 100 mg (1), not specified (1); maintenance doses: 25 mg twice daily (1); 25 mg twice weekly (1); 50 mg once daily (5); 100 mg once daily (1) 100 mg twice daily (1), 150 mg twice daily (1); not specified (1).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nicolau DP. Management of complicated infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance: the role of tigecycline. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:1213–22.PubMedCrossRef Nicolau DP. Management of complicated infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance: the role of tigecycline. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10:1213–22.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Seifert H, Dowzicky MJ. A longitudinal analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical institutions in Germany as part of the Tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial (2004–2007). Chemotherapy. 2009;55:241–52.PubMedCrossRef Seifert H, Dowzicky MJ. A longitudinal analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical institutions in Germany as part of the Tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial (2004–2007). Chemotherapy. 2009;55:241–52.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kresken M, Leitner E, Brauers J, Geiss HK, Halle E, von Eiff C, Peters G, Seifert H. German tigecycline evaluation surveillance trial study group. Susceptibility of common aerobic pathogens to tigecycline: results of a surveillance study in Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:83–90.PubMedCrossRef Kresken M, Leitner E, Brauers J, Geiss HK, Halle E, von Eiff C, Peters G, Seifert H. German tigecycline evaluation surveillance trial study group. Susceptibility of common aerobic pathogens to tigecycline: results of a surveillance study in Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:83–90.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kresken M, Leitner E, Seifert H, Peters G, von Eiff C. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of frequently encountered bacterial species to tigecycline 1 year after the introduction of this new class of antibiotics: results of the second multicentre surveillance trial in Germany (G-TEST II, 2007). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:1007–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kresken M, Leitner E, Seifert H, Peters G, von Eiff C. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of frequently encountered bacterial species to tigecycline 1 year after the introduction of this new class of antibiotics: results of the second multicentre surveillance trial in Germany (G-TEST II, 2007). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:1007–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Summary of product characteristics; tigecycline (Tygacil®); FDA 2013. Summary of product characteristics; tigecycline (Tygacil®); FDA 2013.
6.
go back to reference Summary of product characteristics; tigecycline (Tygacil®); EMA 2013. Summary of product characteristics; tigecycline (Tygacil®); EMA 2013.
7.
go back to reference Babinchak T, Ellis-Grosse E, Dartois N, Rose GM, Loh E. Tigecycline 301 Study Group; Tigecycline 306 Study Group. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 5):S354–67.PubMedCrossRef Babinchak T, Ellis-Grosse E, Dartois N, Rose GM, Loh E. Tigecycline 301 Study Group; Tigecycline 306 Study Group. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 5):S354–67.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ellis-Grosse EJ, Babinchak T, Dartois N, Rose G, Loh E. Tigecycline 300 cSSSI Study Group; Tigecycline 305 cSSSI Study Group. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 5):S341–53.PubMedCrossRef Ellis-Grosse EJ, Babinchak T, Dartois N, Rose G, Loh E. Tigecycline 300 cSSSI Study Group; Tigecycline 305 cSSSI Study Group. The efficacy and safety of tigecycline in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: results of 2 double-blind phase 3 comparison studies with vancomycin-aztreonam. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(Suppl 5):S341–53.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bassetti M, Nicolini L, Repetto E, Righi E, Del Bono V, Viscoli C. Tigecycline use in serious nosocomial infections:a drug use evaluation. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:287.PubMedCentralPubMed Bassetti M, Nicolini L, Repetto E, Righi E, Del Bono V, Viscoli C. Tigecycline use in serious nosocomial infections:a drug use evaluation. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:287.PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lode HM, Stahlmann R, Kresken M. Multiresistant pathogens––a challenge for clinicians. Zentralbl Chir. 2013;138:549–53.PubMedCrossRef Lode HM, Stahlmann R, Kresken M. Multiresistant pathogens––a challenge for clinicians. Zentralbl Chir. 2013;138:549–53.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kujath P, Kujath C. Complicated skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections––are we threatened by multi-resistant pathogens? Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:544–53.PubMedCentralPubMed Kujath P, Kujath C. Complicated skin, skin structure and soft tissue infections––are we threatened by multi-resistant pathogens? Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:544–53.PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ambrosch A, Haefner S, Jude E, Lobmann R. Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int Wound J. 2011;8:567–77.PubMedCrossRef Ambrosch A, Haefner S, Jude E, Lobmann R. Diabetic foot infections: microbiological aspects, current and future antibiotic therapy focusing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int Wound J. 2011;8:567–77.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Meyer E, Schwab F, Gastmeier P. Nosocomial methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia––epidemiology and trends based on data of a network of 586 German ICUs (2005–2009). Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:514–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Meyer E, Schwab F, Gastmeier P. Nosocomial methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia––epidemiology and trends based on data of a network of 586 German ICUs (2005–2009). Eur J Med Res. 2010;15:514–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Bodmann KF, Heizmann WR, von Eiff C, Petrik C, Löschmann PA, Eckmann C. Therapy of 1,025 severely ill patients with complicated infections in a German multicenter study: safety profile and efficacy of tigecycline in different treatment modalities. Chemotherapy. 2012;58:282–94.PubMedCrossRef Bodmann KF, Heizmann WR, von Eiff C, Petrik C, Löschmann PA, Eckmann C. Therapy of 1,025 severely ill patients with complicated infections in a German multicenter study: safety profile and efficacy of tigecycline in different treatment modalities. Chemotherapy. 2012;58:282–94.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ramirez J, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two high-dosage tigecycline regimens versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1756–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ramirez J, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two high-dosage tigecycline regimens versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1756–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heizmann P, Lode H, Heizmann WR. Is monotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics still up to date? New aspects for treatment of severe infections. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012;137:267–70.PubMedCrossRef Heizmann P, Lode H, Heizmann WR. Is monotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics still up to date? New aspects for treatment of severe infections. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012;137:267–70.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zimmermann JB, Horscht JJ, Weigand MA, Bruckner T, Martin EO, Hoppe-Tichy T, Swoboda S. Patients enrolled in randomised clinical trials are not representative of critically ill patients in clinical practice: observational study focus on tigecycline. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;42:436–42.PubMedCrossRef Zimmermann JB, Horscht JJ, Weigand MA, Bruckner T, Martin EO, Hoppe-Tichy T, Swoboda S. Patients enrolled in randomised clinical trials are not representative of critically ill patients in clinical practice: observational study focus on tigecycline. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;42:436–42.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical efficacy of tigecycline used as monotherapy or in combination regimens for complicated infections with documented involvement of multiresistant bacteria
Authors
W. R. Heizmann
P.-A. Löschmann
C. Eckmann
C. von Eiff
K.-F. Bodmann
C. Petrik
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Infection / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0300-8126
Electronic ISSN: 1439-0973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-014-0691-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Infection 1/2015 Go to the issue