Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Cancer Conference Journal 3/2018

01-07-2018 | Case report

Pathologic complete response after gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Takaaki Tatsuguchi, Kunihito Gotoh, Shogo Kobayashi, Kei Asukai, Akira Tomokuni, Hirofumi Akita, Hiroshi Wada, Hidenori Takahashi, Masayuki Ohue, Masahiko Yano, Masato Sakon

Published in: International Cancer Conference Journal | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

We report the case of a 72-year-old man who was initially diagnosed with far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, associated with bulky lymph node metastasis involving the common hepatic artery and moderate amount of ascites around the liver. After 10 cycles of systemic chemotherapy combining gemcitabine and S-1 with well-tolerated toxicities, a CT scan showed a marked shrinkage of the liver mass and lymph nodes (clinical partial response) with disappearance of ascites, which could permit a radical resection of the tumor. He underwent left lobectomy of the liver with lymph node dissection, and histopathological examination revealed pathologic complete response. Seven years after surgery, he is in a good overall condition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Khan SA, Toledano MB, Taylor-Robinson SD et al (2008) Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 10:77–82CrossRef Khan SA, Toledano MB, Taylor-Robinson SD et al (2008) Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 10:77–82CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patel T (2001) Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 33:1353–1357CrossRefPubMed Patel T (2001) Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 33:1353–1357CrossRefPubMed
3.
5.
go back to reference Murakami S, Ajiki T, Okazaki T et al (2014) Factors affecting survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today 44:1847–1854CrossRefPubMed Murakami S, Ajiki T, Okazaki T et al (2014) Factors affecting survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Today 44:1847–1854CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schlinker RT, Nagorney DM, Van Heerden JA et al (1992) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinical aspects, pathology and treatment. HPB Surg 5:95–101CrossRef Schlinker RT, Nagorney DM, Van Heerden JA et al (1992) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinical aspects, pathology and treatment. HPB Surg 5:95–101CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D et al (2001) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 193:384–91CrossRefPubMed Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D et al (2001) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 193:384–91CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Fukuda K et al (2004) An intraductal papillary component is associated with prolonged survival after hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:99–104CrossRefPubMed Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Fukuda K et al (2004) An intraductal papillary component is associated with prolonged survival after hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:99–104CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Morita K et al (2008) The impact of surgical treatment and poor prognostic factors for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 60 patients. Anticancer Res 28(4C):2353–2359PubMed Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Morita K et al (2008) The impact of surgical treatment and poor prognostic factors for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 60 patients. Anticancer Res 28(4C):2353–2359PubMed
10.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC et al (2011) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol 29(23):3140–3145CrossRefPubMed de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC et al (2011) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol 29(23):3140–3145CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Yamamoto M, Yamaue H et al (2011) Impact of nodal involvement on surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the Study Group for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatibiliary Pancreat Sci 18(3):443–52CrossRef Uchiyama K, Yamamoto M, Yamaue H et al (2011) Impact of nodal involvement on surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the Study Group for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatibiliary Pancreat Sci 18(3):443–52CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T et al (2000) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 127(5):498–505CrossRefPubMed Inoue K, Makuuchi M, Takayama T et al (2000) Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 127(5):498–505CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Choi SB, Kim KS, Choi JY et al (2009) The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3048–3056CrossRefPubMed Choi SB, Kim KS, Choi JY et al (2009) The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3048–3056CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Li DY, Zhang HB, Yang N et al (2013) Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series. World J Gastroenterol 19(47):9084–9091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li DY, Zhang HB, Yang N et al (2013) Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series. World J Gastroenterol 19(47):9084–9091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Marubashi S, Gotoh K, Takahashi H et al (2014) Prediction of the postoperative prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): importance of preoperatively-determined anatomic invasion level and number of tumors. Dig Dis Sci 59(1):201–13CrossRef Marubashi S, Gotoh K, Takahashi H et al (2014) Prediction of the postoperative prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): importance of preoperatively-determined anatomic invasion level and number of tumors. Dig Dis Sci 59(1):201–13CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T (1999) Extended resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6(2): 117–21CrossRef Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Yoshikawa T (1999) Extended resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 6(2): 117–21CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kobayashi S, Gotoh K, Takahashi H et al (2016) Clinicopathological features of surgically-resected biliary tract cancer following chemo-radiation therapy. Anticancer Res 36(1):335–42PubMed Kobayashi S, Gotoh K, Takahashi H et al (2016) Clinicopathological features of surgically-resected biliary tract cancer following chemo-radiation therapy. Anticancer Res 36(1):335–42PubMed
18.
go back to reference Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–1281CrossRefPubMed Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–1281CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T et al (2005) Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 92(12):2134–2139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakamura K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T et al (2005) Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 92(12):2134–2139CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y et al (2010) Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65(6):1101–1107CrossRefPubMed Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y et al (2010) Multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65(6):1101–1107CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kato A, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M et al (2015) Downsizing chemotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy followed by radical surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22:S1093-9CrossRefPubMed Kato A, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M et al (2015) Downsizing chemotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy followed by radical surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22:S1093-9CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Slupski MW, Szczylik C, Jasinski MK (2007) Unexpected response to systemic chemotherapy in case of primary nonresectable advanced disseminated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 5:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Slupski MW, Szczylik C, Jasinski MK (2007) Unexpected response to systemic chemotherapy in case of primary nonresectable advanced disseminated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 5:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Tran TB, Bal CK, Schaberg K et al (2015) Locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by left hepatic trisectionectomy and caudate lobectomy. Dig Dis Sci 60(11):3226–3229CrossRefPubMed Tran TB, Bal CK, Schaberg K et al (2015) Locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by left hepatic trisectionectomy and caudate lobectomy. Dig Dis Sci 60(11):3226–3229CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Donahue JM, Nochols FC, Li Z et al (2009) Complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer is associated with enhanced survival. Ann Thorac Surg 87(2):392–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donahue JM, Nochols FC, Li Z et al (2009) Complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer is associated with enhanced survival. Ann Thorac Surg 87(2):392–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Zhao Q, Rashid A, Gong Y, Katz MH, Lee JE, Wolf R et al (2012) Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a better prognosis. Ann Diagn Pathol 16(1):29–37CrossRefPubMed Zhao Q, Rashid A, Gong Y, Katz MH, Lee JE, Wolf R et al (2012) Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated with a better prognosis. Ann Diagn Pathol 16(1):29–37CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A et al (2012) Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2822–2832CrossRefPubMed Zorcolo L, Rosman AS, Restivo A et al (2012) Complete pathologic response after combined modality treatment for rectal cancer and long-term survival: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2822–2832CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pathologic complete response after gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for far advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Takaaki Tatsuguchi
Kunihito Gotoh
Shogo Kobayashi
Kei Asukai
Akira Tomokuni
Hirofumi Akita
Hiroshi Wada
Hidenori Takahashi
Masayuki Ohue
Masahiko Yano
Masato Sakon
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Cancer Conference Journal / Issue 3/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2192-3183
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-018-0327-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

International Cancer Conference Journal 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine