Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 4/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Glycaemic control using different regimens of intermediate- and short-acting insulin in childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus: an experience from a tertiary care centre

Authors: Arijit Singha, Beatrice M. Anne, Sumit Kumar Chakrabarti, Sujoy Ghosh, Subhankar Chowdhury, Rana Bhattacharya

Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Multiple-dose insulin and insulin pump therapy have been found to have better glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes compared to other regimens. In developing countries where this may not be an option for all patients, the efficacy of regimens employing intermediate- and short-acting regimens needs to be determined. The objective of the present study is to compare the HbA1c-lowering efficacy of various regimens of short-acting and intermediate-acting human recombinant insulin in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ninety-eight patients with type 1 diabetes were treated with various regimens of intermediate- and short-acting insulin, and their efficacy was compared. The mean HbA1c at enrolment was 11.34, 10.18 and 10.5 % among the different groups. Six months later, there was a significant reduction in HbA1c in patients on the thrice-daily variable mix of short- and intermediate-acting insulin (group A) compared to those on twice-daily premixed insulin (group B) or on the combination of once-daily premixed insulin and twice-daily short-acting insulin (p = 0.0003). There was a significant reduction in HbA1c in those who were shifted to the group A regimen after 6 months (p = 0023).
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Philip H, Paul B, David R-J, et al. Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1081–7.CrossRef Philip H, Paul B, David R-J, et al. Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1081–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference White NH, Chase HP, Peter Chase H, Silva A, et al. Comparison of glycemic variability associated with insulin glargine and intermediate-acting insulin when used as the basal component of multiple daily injections for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:387–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White NH, Chase HP, Peter Chase H, Silva A, et al. Comparison of glycemic variability associated with insulin glargine and intermediate-acting insulin when used as the basal component of multiple daily injections for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:387–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Factors influencing glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland. A population-based study (DIABAUD2). Diabetes Care. 2001;24:239–244. Factors influencing glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland. A population-based study (DIABAUD2). Diabetes Care. 2001;24:239–244.
5.
go back to reference Shirish C, Shah MD, John I, et al. A randomized trial of intensive insulin therapy in newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:550–8.CrossRef Shirish C, Shah MD, John I, et al. A randomized trial of intensive insulin therapy in newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:550–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mortensen HB, Robertson KJ. Aanstoot, et al. Insulin management and metabolic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence in 18 countries. Diabet Med. 1998;15:752–9.CrossRefPubMed Mortensen HB, Robertson KJ. Aanstoot, et al. Insulin management and metabolic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence in 18 countries. Diabet Med. 1998;15:752–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mortensen HB, Hougaard P. Comparison of metabolic control in a cross-sectional study of 2,873 children and adolescents with IDDM from 18 countries: the Hvidore Study Group on Childhood Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:714–20.CrossRefPubMed Mortensen HB, Hougaard P. Comparison of metabolic control in a cross-sectional study of 2,873 children and adolescents with IDDM from 18 countries: the Hvidore Study Group on Childhood Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:714–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, Twelfth Edition. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, Twelfth Edition.
9.
go back to reference Lepore G, Dodesini AR, Nosari I, et al. Both continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and a multiple daily insulin injection regimen with glargine as basal insulin are equally better than traditional multiple daily insulin injection treatment. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1321–132.CrossRefPubMed Lepore G, Dodesini AR, Nosari I, et al. Both continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and a multiple daily insulin injection regimen with glargine as basal insulin are equally better than traditional multiple daily insulin injection treatment. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1321–132.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bolli GB, Kerr D, Thomas R, et al. Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1170–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bolli GB, Kerr D, Thomas R, et al. Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1170–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Saurbrey N, Arnold-Larsen S, Møller-Jensen B, et al. Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple insulin injections using the NovoPen. Diabet Med. 1988;5:150–3.CrossRefPubMed Saurbrey N, Arnold-Larsen S, Møller-Jensen B, et al. Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple insulin injections using the NovoPen. Diabet Med. 1988;5:150–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hanaire-Broutin H, Melki V, Bessieres-Lacombe S, et al. Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment: a randomized study. The Study Group for the Development of Pump Therapy in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1232–5.CrossRefPubMed Hanaire-Broutin H, Melki V, Bessieres-Lacombe S, et al. Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment: a randomized study. The Study Group for the Development of Pump Therapy in Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1232–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bak JF, Nielsen OH, Pedersen O, et al. Multiple insulin injections using a pen injector versus insulin pump treatment in young diabetic patients. Diabetes Res. 1987;6:155–8.PubMed Bak JF, Nielsen OH, Pedersen O, et al. Multiple insulin injections using a pen injector versus insulin pump treatment in young diabetic patients. Diabetes Res. 1987;6:155–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Marshall SM, Home PD, Taylor R, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus injection therapy: a randomized cross-over trial under usual diabetic clinic conditions. Diabet Med. 1987;4:521–5.CrossRefPubMed Marshall SM, Home PD, Taylor R, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus injection therapy: a randomized cross-over trial under usual diabetic clinic conditions. Diabet Med. 1987;4:521–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA. Glycemic control of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi community. J Diabetes Metab. 2013;4:256.CrossRef Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA. Glycemic control of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Saudi community. J Diabetes Metab. 2013;4:256.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robertson KJ, Greene SA, on behalf of the Scottish Study Group for the Care of the Young Diabetic: a clinical audit of the management of young people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland. Clinical Resource and Audit Group, Scottish Office. 1994. Robertson KJ, Greene SA, on behalf of the Scottish Study Group for the Care of the Young Diabetic: a clinical audit of the management of young people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland. Clinical Resource and Audit Group, Scottish Office. 1994.
Metadata
Title
Glycaemic control using different regimens of intermediate- and short-acting insulin in childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus: an experience from a tertiary care centre
Authors
Arijit Singha
Beatrice M. Anne
Sumit Kumar Chakrabarti
Sujoy Ghosh
Subhankar Chowdhury
Rana Bhattacharya
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0973-3930
Electronic ISSN: 1998-3832
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-016-0509-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 4/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.