Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 4/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population

Authors: Rajesh Rajput, Ompal Saini, Meena Rajput, Vijay Shankar

Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests as a mass screening tool for pre-diabetes and diabetes as defined by standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The study was community-based cross-sectional and carried out in urban field practice area of the Department of Community Medicine at Rohtak. A day before the study, subjects were advised to observe overnight fasting (at least 8 h) and were called at the nearest health center in the morning. Initial evaluation included detailed history and clinical examination to exclude any systemic diseases. FPG and 2-h plasma glucose after 75 g OGTT was used to diagnose pre-diabetes and diabetes in 1008 participant. Fasting plasma glucose and 2-h post glucose load were estimated by glucose oxidase method. HbA1c was measured using Cone lab 30i autoanlyser based on latex agglutination inhibition assay (EIA). The American Diabetic Association (ADA) criteria were used to categorize the subjects into pre-diabetes and diabetes (American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care; 33 Suppl 1:S62–9, 2010). Performance of HbA1c and FPG was evaluated against the results of OGTT by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The prevalence of pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetes was found 20.6 and 12.5 %, respectively. For pre-diabetes, the area under the ROC curve was 0.831 for HbA1c and 0.807 for FPG (p value 0.205), whereas for diabetes, these values were 0.957 for HbA1c and 0.942 for FPG (p value 0.11). At the optimal HbA1c cutoff points of 5.4 % for pre-diabetes and of 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, sensitivities and specificities were 79.02, 79.31 and 94.24, 90.52 %, respectively. Similarly, FPG optimal cutoff points of ≥97 mg/dl for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl for diabetes were found to have maximum sensitivities (specificities) of 93.13 (63.32) and 93.53 (89.64), respectively. It is observed that at optimal cutoff of FPG ≥97 mg/dl and HbA1c ≥5.4 % for pre-diabetes and ≥119 mg/dl and 6.2 % for newly diagnosed diabetes, more true-positive cases are identified as compared to currently recommended ADA criteria when both were compared with results of 75 g OGTT. As a screening tool for newly diagnosed pre-diabetes and diabetes, the HbA1c measurement did not perform inferior than FPG. In this study population, FPG and HbA1c values lower than the currently recommended values of ADA were found to be better predictor of pre-diabetes and diabetes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation: 2013. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation: 2013.
2.
go back to reference Webb DR, Khunti K, Srinivasan B, Gray LJ, Taub N, Campbell S, et al. Rationale and design of the ADDITION-Leicester study, a systematic screening programme and randomised controlled trial of multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus detected by screening. Trials. 2010;11:16.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Webb DR, Khunti K, Srinivasan B, Gray LJ, Taub N, Campbell S, et al. Rationale and design of the ADDITION-Leicester study, a systematic screening programme and randomised controlled trial of multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus detected by screening. Trials. 2010;11:16.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53.CrossRefPubMed Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. WHO Global Burden of Diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, & projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414–31.CrossRefPubMed King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. WHO Global Burden of Diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, & projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414–31.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference The International Expert Committee. International expert committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 32 7:1327–34. The International Expert Committee. International expert committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 32 7:1327–34.
6.
7.
go back to reference Barr RG, Nathan DM, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Tests of glycemia for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(4):263–72.CrossRefPubMed Barr RG, Nathan DM, Meigs JB, Singer DE. Tests of glycemia for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(4):263–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Saudek CD, Herman WH, Sacks DB, Bergenstal RM, Edelman D, Davidson MB. A new look at screening and diagnosing diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2447–53.CrossRefPubMed Saudek CD, Herman WH, Sacks DB, Bergenstal RM, Edelman D, Davidson MB. A new look at screening and diagnosing diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2447–53.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bonoro E, Tuomilehto J. The pros and cons of diagnosing diabetes with A1c. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):5184–90. Bonoro E, Tuomilehto J. The pros and cons of diagnosing diabetes with A1c. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(2):5184–90.
10.
go back to reference Mohan V, Vijaychandrika V, Gokulakrishnan K, Anjana RM, Ganesan A, Weber MB, et al. A1c cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):515–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mohan V, Vijaychandrika V, Gokulakrishnan K, Anjana RM, Ganesan A, Weber MB, et al. A1c cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):515–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):644–7.CrossRefPubMed Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(5):644–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bao Y, Ma X, Li H, Zhou M, Hu C, Wu H, et al. Glycated haemoglobin A1c for diagnosis diabetes in Chinese population; cross sectional epidemiological study. BMJ. 2010;340:2249.CrossRef Bao Y, Ma X, Li H, Zhou M, Hu C, Wu H, et al. Glycated haemoglobin A1c for diagnosis diabetes in Chinese population; cross sectional epidemiological study. BMJ. 2010;340:2249.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Perry RC, Shankar RR, Fineberg N, McGill J, Baron AD. HbA1c measurement improves the detection of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with non-diagnostic levels of fasting plasma glucose: the early diabetes intervention program (EDIP). Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):465–71.CrossRefPubMed Perry RC, Shankar RR, Fineberg N, McGill J, Baron AD. HbA1c measurement improves the detection of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with non-diagnostic levels of fasting plasma glucose: the early diabetes intervention program (EDIP). Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):465–71.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA1c: analysis of glucose profiles and HbA1c in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):275–8.CrossRefPubMed Rohlfing CL, Wiedmeyer HM, Little RR, England JD, Tennill A, Goldstein DE. Defining the relationship between plasma glucose and HbA1c: analysis of glucose profiles and HbA1c in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(2):275–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nakagami T, Tominaga M, Nishimura R, Yoshike N, Daimon M, Oizumi T, et al. Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan national diabetes survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(2):251–6.CrossRefPubMed Nakagami T, Tominaga M, Nishimura R, Yoshike N, Daimon M, Oizumi T, et al. Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan national diabetes survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(2):251–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tsuji IMD, Nakamota K, Hasegawa T, Hisashige A, Inowashiro H, Fukao A, et al. Receiver operating characteristics analysis of fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and fructosamine on diabetes screening. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(11):1075–7.CrossRefPubMed Tsuji IMD, Nakamota K, Hasegawa T, Hisashige A, Inowashiro H, Fukao A, et al. Receiver operating characteristics analysis of fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and fructosamine on diabetes screening. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(11):1075–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nair M, Prabhakaran D, Narayan KM, Sinha R, Lakshmy R, Devasenapathy N, et al. HbA1c values for defining diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in Asian Indians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2011;5(2):95–102.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Nair M, Prabhakaran D, Narayan KM, Sinha R, Lakshmy R, Devasenapathy N, et al. HbA1c values for defining diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in Asian Indians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2011;5(2):95–102.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kumar PR, Bhansali A, Ravikiran M, Bhansali S, Dutta P, Thakur JS, et al. Utility of glycated haemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2832–5.CrossRefPubMed Kumar PR, Bhansali A, Ravikiran M, Bhansali S, Dutta P, Thakur JS, et al. Utility of glycated haemoglobin in diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus: a community based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2832–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of HbA1c and FPG as a screening tool for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Indian population
Authors
Rajesh Rajput
Ompal Saini
Meena Rajput
Vijay Shankar
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0973-3930
Electronic ISSN: 1998-3832
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-015-0343-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 4/2015 Go to the issue