Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

Analysis of five glucometers available in India

Authors: Vinay Kumar, Deepthi Indukuri, Navakanta Bhat

Published in: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

In this study, we report on the accuracy, precision and clinical acceptability of the five blood glucose meters available in India. Glucose levels of 100 blood samples were measured with each meter, at IISc health centre laboratory under same conditions and the results were compared with laboratory reference standard. In order to calculate the coefficient of variation (CV), each sample was tested three times. None of the glucometer showed 100 % compliance on CV measure. In terms of accuracy, none of the glucometer satisfied the most stringent ADA-1994 standard. In general all the glucometers showed improved accuracy with respect to the most relaxed ISO 1597:2003 standard. The Clarke error grid analysis was performed to assess the clinical acceptability of the glucometers. All five glucometers had more than 90 % of test results in Zone A and B. Bland–Altman analysis indicates that all glucometers show a positive bias, indicating that the measured values tend to be higher than the laboratory reference standard.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Aiello LP et al. Diabetic retinopathy, diabetes care 2002;25 suppl 1. Aiello LP et al. Diabetic retinopathy, diabetes care 2002;25 suppl 1.
3.
go back to reference “Putting feet first in diabetes”, Editorial, Lancet 2005;366:1674 “Putting feet first in diabetes”, Editorial, Lancet 2005;366:1674
4.
go back to reference International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 5th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2011. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 5th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2011.
5.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968–83.CrossRef The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968–83.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nathan DM, Lachin J, Cleary P, Orchard T, Brillon DJ, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes therapy and carotid intima–media thickness in type 1 diabetes mellitus, N Engl J Med. 2003;348:23. Nathan DM, Lachin J, Cleary P, Orchard T, Brillon DJ, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes therapy and carotid intima–media thickness in type 1 diabetes mellitus, N Engl J Med. 2003;348:23.
8.
go back to reference Solnica B, Naskalski JW. Quality control of self-monitoring of blood glucose: Why and how? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1:167. Solnica B, Naskalski JW. Quality control of self-monitoring of blood glucose: Why and how? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1:167.
9.
go back to reference Cohen M, Boyle E, Delaney C, Shaw J. A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;71:115–16. Cohen M, Boyle E, Delaney C, Shaw J. A comparison of blood glucose meters in Australia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;71:115–16.
10.
go back to reference Essack Y, Hoffman M, Rensburg M, Van Wyk J. A comparison of five glucometers in South Africa. JEMDSA 2009;14:104. Essack Y, Hoffman M, Rensburg M, Van Wyk J. A comparison of five glucometers in South Africa. JEMDSA 2009;14:104.
11.
go back to reference Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:975. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:975.
12.
go back to reference Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:84. Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:84.
13.
go back to reference Freckmann G et al. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:221. Freckmann G et al. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:221.
14.
go back to reference Heinemann L, Lodwig V, Freckmann G. Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:438. Heinemann L, Lodwig V, Freckmann G. Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:438.
15.
go back to reference Torbati PM, Yam AA. Analytical performance and quality control of a glucose monitor system. Iran J Pathol. 2011;6:624. Torbati PM, Yam AA. Analytical performance and quality control of a glucose monitor system. Iran J Pathol. 2011;6:624.
16.
go back to reference Clarke WL, et al. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:586. Clarke WL, et al. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:586.
17.
go back to reference Brunner GA, Ellmerer M, Sendlhofer G, Wutte A, Trajanoski Z. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1823. Brunner GA, Ellmerer M, Sendlhofer G, Wutte A, Trajanoski Z. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1823.
18.
go back to reference Weitgasser R et al. Newer portable glucose meters—analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices? Clin Chem. 1999;45:1266–1268 . Weitgasser R et al. Newer portable glucose meters—analytical improvement compared with previous generation devices? Clin Chem. 1999;45:1266–1268 .
19.
go back to reference Ginsberg BH. We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:1266–8. Ginsberg BH. We need tighter regulatory standards for blood glucose monitoring, but they should be for accuracy disclosure. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:1266–8.
20.
go back to reference Chan JCN et al. Accuracy, precision and user-acceptability of self-blood glucose monitoring machines. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;36:91–104.CrossRefPubMed Chan JCN et al. Accuracy, precision and user-acceptability of self-blood glucose monitoring machines. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;36:91–104.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jamaluddin FA et al. Variability of point-of-care testing blood glucometers versus the laboratory reference method in a tertiary teaching hospital. Asian Biomedicine. 2012;6:67–74. Jamaluddin FA et al. Variability of point-of-care testing blood glucometers versus the laboratory reference method in a tertiary teaching hospital. Asian Biomedicine. 2012;6:67–74.
22.
go back to reference Using the bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. British J Anaesthesia. 2007;19:309–11. Using the bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. British J Anaesthesia. 2007;19:309–11.
23.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307–10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307–10.
24.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies, the statistician 1983; 32:307–317. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies, the statistician 1983; 32:307–317.
25.
go back to reference D’Orazio P, Burnett RW, et al. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (Abbreviated). Clin Chem. 2005;51:1573–6.CrossRefPubMed D’Orazio P, Burnett RW, et al. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose (Abbreviated). Clin Chem. 2005;51:1573–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sacks DB, Arnold M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2002;48:436–72.PubMed Sacks DB, Arnold M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem. 2002;48:436–72.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hasslacher C et al. Accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose systems in a clinical setting: application of new planned ISO- standards, Clin. Lab. 2013;59:727–33 Hasslacher C et al. Accuracy of self monitoring blood glucose systems in a clinical setting: application of new planned ISO- standards, Clin. Lab. 2013;59:727–33
28.
go back to reference Krouwer JS et al. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 4:1061. Krouwer JS et al. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 4:1061.
29.
go back to reference Freckmann G et al. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;1061. Freckmann G et al. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;1061.
Metadata
Title
Analysis of five glucometers available in India
Authors
Vinay Kumar
Deepthi Indukuri
Navakanta Bhat
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0973-3930
Electronic ISSN: 1998-3832
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-014-0216-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries 3/2015 Go to the issue