Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Cholecystitis | Original Article

Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study

Authors: Taras Nechay, Svetlana Titkova, Alexander Tyagunov, Mikhail Anurov, Alexander Sazhin

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure in acute cholecystitis (AC). Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs in-hospital stay. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve outcomes of emergency LC. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LC in patients with AC. A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized non-blinded clinical trial (NCT03754751). The mERAS group consisted of 88 patients the control group of 101 patients. The modified protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). The postoperative length of stay in the mERAS group was shorter (24 (21–45.5) h) than in the control (45 (41–68) h) (p < 0.0001). One re-admission in the mERAS group was reported (p = 0.466). There difference in complications was insignificant (mERAS 6.8% vs 5% p = 0.757). Post-operative pain intensity was significantly lower in the mERAS group immediately after awaking (3.7 ± 1.8 vs 5.4 ± 1.3 p < 0.0001), 2 h (3.3 ± 1.7 vs 4.9 ± 1.6 p =  0.0006), 6 h (2.9 ± 1.5 vs 4.2 ± 1.2 p  < 0.0001), 12 h (2.7 ± 0.9 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 p = 0.0001) and 24 h after surgery (2.1 ± 1.2 vs 3 ± 1.2 p <  0.0001). The incidence of shoulder and neck pain was lower in mERAS group (13.6% vs 34.7% p = 0.0009). Peristalsis recovery was similar in both groups. The proposed protocol improved postoperative recovery and reduced hospital stay in patients with AC without increasing the rate of complications or re-admissions.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7:132–140CrossRefPubMed Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7:132–140CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Isazadehfar K, Entezariasl M, Shahbazzadegan B et al (2017) The comparative study of ondansetron and metoclopramide effects in reducing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Med Iran 55:254–258PubMed Isazadehfar K, Entezariasl M, Shahbazzadegan B et al (2017) The comparative study of ondansetron and metoclopramide effects in reducing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Med Iran 55:254–258PubMed
16.
go back to reference Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL et al (2018) Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. Br J Anaesth 121:787–803CrossRefPubMed Barazanchi AWH, MacFater WS, Rahiri JL et al (2018) Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update. Br J Anaesth 121:787–803CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Loizides S, Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M et al (2014) Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014:CD007049 Loizides S, Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M et al (2014) Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014:CD007049
18.
go back to reference Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R et al (2018) The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery programs and their application in cardiothoracic surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 14:77–88PubMedPubMedCentral Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R et al (2018) The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery programs and their application in cardiothoracic surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 14:77–88PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Brustia P, Renghi A, Gramaglia L et al (2003) Mininvasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach. J Cardiovasc Surg 44:629–635 Brustia P, Renghi A, Gramaglia L et al (2003) Mininvasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach. J Cardiovasc Surg 44:629–635
22.
go back to reference Scott MJ, Baldini G, Fearon KCH et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 59:1212–1231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scott MJ, Baldini G, Fearon KCH et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 59:1212–1231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM et al (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5:70–78PubMedPubMedCentral Paduraru M, Ponchietti L, Casas IM et al (2017) Enhanced recovery after emergency surgery: a systematic review. Bull Emerg Trauma 5:70–78PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Зaтeвaxин ИИ, Caжин AB, Киpиeнкo AИ et al (2020) Диaгнocтичecкиe и лeчeбныe пoдxoды пpи ocтpoм aппeндицитe в пpaктикe xиpypгoв Poccийcкoй Фeдepaции. Peзyльтaты oбщepoccийcкoгo oпpoca. Xиpypгия им HИПиpoгoвa No 8:5–16 Зaтeвaxин ИИ, Caжин AB, Киpиeнкo AИ et al (2020) Диaгнocтичecкиe и лeчeбныe пoдxoды пpи ocтpoм aппeндицитe в пpaктикe xиpypгoв Poccийcкoй Фeдepaции. Peзyльтaты oбщepoccийcкoгo oпpoca. Xиpypгия им HИПиpoгoвa No 8:5–16
38.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Hossain MM, Begum M, Hossain M et al (2019) Efficacy of palonosetron as antiemetic prophylaxis for post operative patients. Mymensingh Med J 28:222–229PubMed Hossain MM, Begum M, Hossain M et al (2019) Efficacy of palonosetron as antiemetic prophylaxis for post operative patients. Mymensingh Med J 28:222–229PubMed
43.
go back to reference Shah JN, Maharjan SB, Manandhar K (2012) Early feeding and discontinuation of intravenous fluid after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Nepal Health Res Council 10:28–31 Shah JN, Maharjan SB, Manandhar K (2012) Early feeding and discontinuation of intravenous fluid after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Nepal Health Res Council 10:28–31
Metadata
Title
Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study
Authors
Taras Nechay
Svetlana Titkova
Alexander Tyagunov
Mikhail Anurov
Alexander Sazhin
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01031-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Updates in Surgery 4/2021 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor