Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2014

01-08-2014

Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy

Authors: Didier Roulin, Catherine Blanc, Mirza Muradbegovic, Dieter Hahnloser, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery protocols have been proven to decrease complications and hospital stay following elective colorectal surgery. However, these principles have not yet been reported for urgent surgery procedures. We aimed to assess our initial experience with urgent colectomies performed within an established enhanced recovery pathway.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, all patients undergoing colonic resection between April 2012 and March 2013 were treated according to a standardized enhanced recovery protocol. Urgent surgeries were compared with the elective procedures with regards to baseline characteristics, compliance with enhanced recovery items, and clinical outcome.

Results

Patients (N = 28) requiring urgent colonic resection were included and compared with patients undergoing elective colectomy (N = 63). Overall compliance with the protocol was 57 % for the urgent compared with 77 % for the elective procedures (p = 0.006). The pre-operative compliance was 64 versus 96 % (p < 0.001), the intra-operative compliance was 77 versus 86 % (p = 0.145), and the post-operative compliance was 49 versus 67 % (p = 0.015), for the urgent and elective resections, respectively. Overall, 18 urgent patients (64 %) and 32 elective patients (51 %) developed postoperative complications (p = 0.261). Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days in the urgent setting compared with 5 days in the elective setting (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Many of the intra-operative and post-operative enhanced recovery items can also be applied to urgent colectomy, entailing outcomes that approach the results achieved in the elective setting.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809PubMedCrossRef Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010:434–440CrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010:434–440CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kehlet H (2011) Surgery: fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:539–540PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H (2011) Surgery: fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:539–540PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635
6.
7.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM et al (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 37:1082–1093. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-1938-4 PubMedCrossRef Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM et al (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 37:1082–1093. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-013-1938-4 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cakir H, van Stijn MF, Lopes Cardozo AM et al (2013) Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and length of stay after colonic resection. Colorectal Dis 15:1019–1025PubMedCrossRef Cakir H, van Stijn MF, Lopes Cardozo AM et al (2013) Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and length of stay after colonic resection. Colorectal Dis 15:1019–1025PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed
18.
go back to reference Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840PubMedCrossRef Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy
Authors
Didier Roulin
Catherine Blanc
Mirza Muradbegovic
Dieter Hahnloser
Nicolas Demartines
Martin Hübner
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2518-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

World Journal of Surgery 8/2014 Go to the issue