Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Liver Resection | Review Article

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Nikolaos Machairas, Ioannis D. Kostakis, Dimitrios Schizas, Stylianos Kykalos, Nikolaos Nikiteas, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive hepatic malignancy. An up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted aiming to compare outcomes between laparoscopic (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for patients with iCCA. A systematic literature search of Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was performed. A total of 8 studies comprising 2872 patients, who underwent LLR or OLR for iCCA, were included in our meta-analysis. LLR patients had smaller tumors [mean difference (MD): − 1.17 cm, 95% confidence intervals (CI) − 1.77 to − 0.57, p = 0.0001], underwent major resections less frequently [risk ratio (RR): 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.83, p < 0.00001] and R0 resections more frequently (RR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09, p = 0.01), while lymphadenectomy was less common in the laparoscopic group (RR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92, p = 0.007). The LLR group presented reduced blood loss (MD: − 270.16 ml, 95% CI − 381.53 to − 32.79, p = 0.002), need for transfusion (RR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.73, p = 0.003), overall morbidity (RR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.4–0.83, p = 0.003) and hospital stay (MD: − 3.48 days, 95% CI: − 6.94 to − 0.02, p = 0.05) compared to the OLR group. No differences were shown in operative time (MD: 1.6 min, 95% CI − 34.17–37.37, p = 0.93), major morbidity (RR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.38–1.11, p = 0.12), mortality (RR: 1.42, 95% CI 0.13–15.07, p = 0.77), overall (HR: 0.9, 95% CI 0.59–1.38, p = 0.63) and relapse-free survival (HR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.5–1.16, p = 0.21) between the two groups. LLR seems to benefit patients with iCCA in terms of short-term outcomes, whilst long-term outcomes are comparable among the two approaches.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Wu L, Tsilimigras DI, Paredes AZ, Mehta R, Hyer JM, Merath K et al (2019) Trends in the incidence, treatment and outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: facility type is associated with margin status, use of lymphadenectomy and overall survival. World J Surg 43(7):1777–1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04966-4CrossRefPubMed Wu L, Tsilimigras DI, Paredes AZ, Mehta R, Hyer JM, Merath K et al (2019) Trends in the incidence, treatment and outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: facility type is associated with margin status, use of lymphadenectomy and overall survival. World J Surg 43(7):1777–1787. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00268-019-04966-4CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65-94CrossRefPubMed Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65-94CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefPubMed Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, Gagliano A, Paganelli M, Catena M et al (2016) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1999–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4430-4CrossRefPubMed Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, Gagliano A, Paganelli M, Catena M et al (2016) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1999–2010. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-015-4430-4CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Machairas N (2017) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: The European experience. J BUON 22(5):1160–1171PubMed Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Machairas N (2017) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: The European experience. J BUON 22(5):1160–1171PubMed
40.
go back to reference Amin MB (2017) American Joint Committee on cancer staging manual, Eight. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Amin MB (2017) American Joint Committee on cancer staging manual, Eight. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Nikolaos Machairas
Ioannis D. Kostakis
Dimitrios Schizas
Stylianos Kykalos
Nikolaos Nikiteas
Georgios C. Sotiropoulos
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00930-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue

Foreword

Foreword