Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

One-year evaluation of anorectal functionality and quality of life in patients affected by mid-to-low rectal cancer treated with transanal total mesorectal excision

Authors: Veronica De Simone, Roberto Persiani, Alberto Biondi, Francesco Litta, Angelo Parello, Paola Campennì, Raffaele Orefice, Angelo Marra, Alessandra Costa, Domenico D’Ugo, Carlo Ratto

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Surgery of mid-to-low rectal cancer is still considered challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision has been proposed to facilitate the mesorectal dissection, gain sphincter-saving procedures, and reduce functional sequelae. Few studies have investigated long-term functional outcomes and patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes and quality of life before and after transanal total mesorectal excision in 1-year follow-up. Between February 2016 and April 2019, 51 patients with mid- or low rectal cancer undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” were enrolled. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was administered to locally advanced cancers. Before and after the surgical procedure, patients were examined collecting clinical data, LARS score, CCFIS, SF36 and FIQL, performing anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography. Thirty-three patients were eligible and completed the 12 months follow-up. After treatment, six patients (18.2%) had minor or major LARS. A mild but significant increase of CCFIS was documented. Only the mean resting pressure significantly decreased at follow-up. No sphincter lesions were documented. FIQL assessment showed significant reduction of lifestyle, coping/behaviour, and embarrassment, while an increase of general health was assessed by SF36. At both uni- and multivariate analyses the neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy had a not negligible impact. Transanal total mesorectal excision represents a safe approach to patients treated for mid- or low rectal cancer. The functional sequelae can be limited in severity, with a low incidence of minor/major LARS, particularly faecal incontinence. These results are comparable to those obtained by the conventional total mesorectal excision.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–81PubMed Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–81PubMed
2.
go back to reference de Lacy FB, Chadi SA, Berho M et al (2018) The future of rectal cancer surgery: a narrative review of an international symposium. Surg Innov 25(5):525–35CrossRef de Lacy FB, Chadi SA, Berho M et al (2018) The future of rectal cancer surgery: a narrative review of an international symposium. Surg Innov 25(5):525–35CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–10CrossRef Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–10CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS et al (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: From top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):28–39CrossRef Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS et al (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: From top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):28–39CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 17(1):31–5CrossRef Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 17(1):31–5CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2019) Feasibility study of transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 100(6):828-31; discussion 31. Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2019) Feasibility study of transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 100(6):828-31; discussion 31.
7.
go back to reference Vignali A, Elmore U, Milone M, Rosati R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives. Updates Surg. 71(1):29–37CrossRef Vignali A, Elmore U, Milone M, Rosati R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): current status and future perspectives. Updates Surg. 71(1):29–37CrossRef
8.
go back to reference European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating G (2018) An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Colorectal Dis 20(Suppl 6):33–46CrossRef European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating G (2018) An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Colorectal Dis 20(Suppl 6):33–46CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ma G, Jiang HY (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a single-surgeon setting: refinements of the technique during the learning phase. Tech Coloproctol 22(6):433–43CrossRef Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ma G, Jiang HY (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a single-surgeon setting: refinements of the technique during the learning phase. Tech Coloproctol 22(6):433–43CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24(9):2200–5CrossRef Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24(9):2200–5CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kneist W, Wachter N, Paschold M, Kauff DW, Rink AD, Lang H (2016) Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20(1):41–9CrossRef Kneist W, Wachter N, Paschold M, Kauff DW, Rink AD, Lang H (2016) Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20(1):41–9CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–30CrossRef Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–30CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ et al (2019) Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 33(1):79–87CrossRef Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ et al (2019) Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 33(1):79–87CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bjoern MX, Perdawood SK (2020) Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 24(3):231–6CrossRef Bjoern MX, Perdawood SK (2020) Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 24(3):231–6CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Keller DS, Reali C, Spinelli A et al (2019) Patient-reported functional and quality-of-life outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 106(4):364–6CrossRef Keller DS, Reali C, Spinelli A et al (2019) Patient-reported functional and quality-of-life outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 106(4):364–6CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kneist W, Hanke L, Kauff DW, Lang H (2016) Surgeons’ assessment of internal anal sphincter nerve supply during TaTME - inbetween expectations and reality. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25(5):241–6CrossRef Kneist W, Hanke L, Kauff DW, Lang H (2016) Surgeons’ assessment of internal anal sphincter nerve supply during TaTME - inbetween expectations and reality. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25(5):241–6CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):25–33CrossRef Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):25–33CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–15CrossRef Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–15CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261(2):228–33CrossRef Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261(2):228–33CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cuschieri S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl 1):S31–S4CrossRef Cuschieri S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl 1):S31–S4CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Persiani R, Biondi A, Pennestri F et al (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of low and middle rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 61(7):809–16CrossRef Persiani R, Biondi A, Pennestri F et al (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in the treatment of low and middle rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 61(7):809–16CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–8CrossRef Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–8CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Solh WWSDSSIDGW, Ghoniem GM, Wexner SD (2008) Scoring systems. Dysfunction PF. Springer, London Solh WWSDSSIDGW, Ghoniem GM, Wexner SD (2008) Scoring systems. Dysfunction PF. Springer, London
24.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–83CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–83CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16CrossRef Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Brouwer NPM, Bos A, Lemmens V et al (2018) An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer 143(11):2758–66CrossRef Brouwer NPM, Bos A, Lemmens V et al (2018) An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer 143(11):2758–66CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–7CrossRef Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60(1):114–7CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M et al (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 18(5):473–80CrossRef Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M et al (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 18(5):473–80CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):1–1 Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):1–1
30.
go back to reference van der Heijden JAG, Koeter T, Smits LJH et al (2020) Functional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis. Br J Sur 107(5):489–98CrossRef van der Heijden JAG, Koeter T, Smits LJH et al (2020) Functional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis. Br J Sur 107(5):489–98CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Czerwinska A et al (2018) A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):218CrossRef Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Czerwinska A et al (2018) A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):218CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Elmore U, Vignali A, Cossu A, De Nardi P, Lemma M, Parise P (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 107(5):489 Elmore U, Vignali A, Cossu A, De Nardi P, Lemma M, Parise P (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 107(5):489
33.
go back to reference De Angelis N, Portigliotti L, Azoulay D, Brunetti F (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(8):945–59CrossRef De Angelis N, Portigliotti L, Azoulay D, Brunetti F (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center experience and systematic review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(8):945–59CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hanke L, Kauff D, Lang H, Kneist W (2017) Ano(neo-)rectal Function After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) for Primary Rectal Cancer. 134th Congress of the German Society of Surgery (DGCH); Munich, Germany: European Surgical Research. Hanke L, Kauff D, Lang H, Kneist W (2017) Ano(neo-)rectal Function After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) for Primary Rectal Cancer. 134th Congress of the German Society of Surgery (DGCH); Munich, Germany: European Surgical Research.
35.
go back to reference Mosquera C, Licardie E, Bravo D, Madarro C, Rosales J, Romero JA (2019) Fecal incontinence after surgical treatment of middle–low rectal cancer. Laparoscopic low anterior resection versus tatme. Surg Endosc Mosquera C, Licardie E, Bravo D, Madarro C, Rosales J, Romero JA (2019) Fecal incontinence after surgical treatment of middle–low rectal cancer. Laparoscopic low anterior resection versus tatme. Surg Endosc
36.
go back to reference Camilleri-Brennan J, Ruta DA, Steele RJ (2002) Patient generated index: new instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg 26(11):1354–9CrossRef Camilleri-Brennan J, Ruta DA, Steele RJ (2002) Patient generated index: new instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg 26(11):1354–9CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto AM, Kellokumpu IH (2006) Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(5):568–78CrossRef Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto AM, Kellokumpu IH (2006) Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(5):568–78CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, Thaha MA, Chan CL (2012) Anterior resection syndrome. Lancet Oncol 13(9):e403-8CrossRef Bryant CL, Lunniss PJ, Knowles CH, Thaha MA, Chan CL (2012) Anterior resection syndrome. Lancet Oncol 13(9):e403-8CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ribas Y, Aguilar F, Jovell-Fernandez E, Cayetano L, Navarro-Luna A, Munoz-Duyos A (2017) Clinical application of the LARS score: results from a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(3):409–18CrossRef Ribas Y, Aguilar F, Jovell-Fernandez E, Cayetano L, Navarro-Luna A, Munoz-Duyos A (2017) Clinical application of the LARS score: results from a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(3):409–18CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ribas Y, Munoz-Duyos A (2019) How useful is the LARS score in the evaluation and treatment of LARS? Tech Coloproctol 23(2):195–6CrossRef Ribas Y, Munoz-Duyos A (2019) How useful is the LARS score in the evaluation and treatment of LARS? Tech Coloproctol 23(2):195–6CrossRef
Metadata
Title
One-year evaluation of anorectal functionality and quality of life in patients affected by mid-to-low rectal cancer treated with transanal total mesorectal excision
Authors
Veronica De Simone
Roberto Persiani
Alberto Biondi
Francesco Litta
Angelo Parello
Paola Campennì
Raffaele Orefice
Angelo Marra
Alessandra Costa
Domenico D’Ugo
Carlo Ratto
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00919-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Updates in Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue

Foreword

Foreword