Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision

Authors: M. X. Bjoern, S. K. Perdawood

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common following surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) involves intraoperative stretching of the anal sphincter while an anal single port is placed, which can potentially further disturb anorectal function. The aim of our study was to systematically assess anal function after TaTME using anorectal manometry and questionnaires.

Methods

Patients who had TaTME for rectal cancer at our institution were prospectively assessed by means of anorectal manometry and the standard LARS score. The primary endpoint was the resting pressure to assess internal sphincter damage and the secondary endpoints were squeeze pressure to assess external anal sphincter and analysis of correlation between LARS score and these two manometry parameters. Patients who had laparoscopic TME (LaTME) served as a control group.

Results

Out of 81 patients invited to participate 48 accepted. There were 36 in theTaTMEgroup, and 12 in the LaTMEgroup. The mean follow-up time from the index operation date to the assessment date was 41.34 months (± SD 24.834). The mean resting pressure did not differ significantly between the groups (36.44 mmHg ± 18.514 and 36.58 mmHg ± 13.318 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.981). The mean squeeze pressure was also comparable (125.00 mmHg ± 66.141 and 111.83 mmHg ± 51.111 in the TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively, p = 0.533). The mean LARS score was comparable and showed comparable results. The analysis of correlation between LARS score and manometry parameters showed no significant associations between resting or squeeze pressure and L:ARS score.

Conclusions

Following TME surgery, the resting and squeeze pressures of the anal sphincter measured by manometry were generally decreased, with no differences between the transanal and laparoscopic approaches.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bulow S, Harling H, Iversen LH, Ladelund S (2010) Improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 12(7 Online):e37–e42 Bulow S, Harling H, Iversen LH, Ladelund S (2010) Improved survival after rectal cancer in Denmark. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 12(7 Online):e37–e42
2.
go back to reference Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–281 Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22(3):277–281
3.
go back to reference Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRef Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(7):767–774CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):194 Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 373(2):194
5.
go back to reference Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Sietses C et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRef Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Sietses C et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Denost Q, Quintane L, Buscail E, Martenot M, Laurent C, Rullier E (2013) Short- and longterm impact of body mass index on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 15(4):463–469 Denost Q, Quintane L, Buscail E, Martenot M, Laurent C, Rullier E (2013) Short- and longterm impact of body mass index on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 15(4):463–469
7.
go back to reference Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321CrossRef Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):1–11 Bjorn MX, Perdawood SK (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a systematic review. Dan Med J 62(7):1–11
9.
go back to reference Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS, Martin-Perez B, Alrawi S, Lacy AM et al (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: from top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):28–39CrossRef Emile SH, de Lacy FB, Keller DS, Martin-Perez B, Alrawi S, Lacy AM et al (2018) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: from top to bottom. World J Gastrointest Surg 10(3):28–39CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–928CrossRef Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255(5):922–928CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Juul T, Battersby NJ, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Laurberg S et al (2015) Validation of the English translation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 17(10):908–916 Juul T, Battersby NJ, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Laurberg S et al (2015) Validation of the English translation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 17(10):908–916
12.
go back to reference Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630CrossRef Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Harling H, Nickelsen T (2005) The Danish colorectal cancer database. Ugeskr Laeger 167(44):4187–4189PubMed Harling H, Nickelsen T (2005) The Danish colorectal cancer database. Ugeskr Laeger 167(44):4187–4189PubMed
14.
go back to reference Badic B, Joumond A, Thereaux J, Gancel CH, Bail JP (2018) Long-term functional and oncological results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer—cohort study. Int J Surg Lond Engl 52:1–6CrossRef Badic B, Joumond A, Thereaux J, Gancel CH, Bail JP (2018) Long-term functional and oncological results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer—cohort study. Int J Surg Lond Engl 52:1–6CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Coco C, Valentini V, Manno A, Rizzo G, Gambacorta MA, Mattana C et al (2007) Functional results after radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(8):903–910CrossRef Coco C, Valentini V, Manno A, Rizzo G, Gambacorta MA, Mattana C et al (2007) Functional results after radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(8):903–910CrossRef
16.
go back to reference De Nardi P, Testoni SGG, Corsetti M, Andreoletti H, Giollo P, Passaretti S et al (2017) Manometric evaluation of anorectal function in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver 49(1):91–97 De Nardi P, Testoni SGG, Corsetti M, Andreoletti H, Giollo P, Passaretti S et al (2017) Manometric evaluation of anorectal function in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver 49(1):91–97
17.
go back to reference Ihnat P, Slivova I, Tulinsky L, Ihnat Rudinska L, Maca J, Penka I (2018) Anorectal dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer with and without radiotherapy (manometry study). J Surg Oncol 117(4):710–716CrossRef Ihnat P, Slivova I, Tulinsky L, Ihnat Rudinska L, Maca J, Penka I (2018) Anorectal dysfunction after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer with and without radiotherapy (manometry study). J Surg Oncol 117(4):710–716CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kupsch J, Jackisch T, Matzel KE, Zimmer J, Schreiber A, Sims A et al (2018) Outcome of bowel function following anterior resection for rectal cancer-an analysis using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(6):787–798CrossRef Kupsch J, Jackisch T, Matzel KE, Zimmer J, Schreiber A, Sims A et al (2018) Outcome of bowel function following anterior resection for rectal cancer-an analysis using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(6):787–798CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Canda AE, Terzi C, Gorken IB, Oztop I, Sokmen S, Fuzun M (2010) Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):197–204CrossRef Canda AE, Terzi C, Gorken IB, Oztop I, Sokmen S, Fuzun M (2010) Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):197–204CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) Usefulness of anorectal manometry for diagnosing continence problems after a low anterior resection. Ann Coloproctology 32(3):101–104CrossRef Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) Usefulness of anorectal manometry for diagnosing continence problems after a low anterior resection. Ann Coloproctology 32(3):101–104CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Biviano I, Balla A, Badiali D, Quaresima S, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche E et al (2017) Anal function after endoluminal locoregional resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 19(6):O177–O185 Biviano I, Balla A, Badiali D, Quaresima S, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche E et al (2017) Anal function after endoluminal locoregional resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol G B Irel 19(6):O177–O185
22.
go back to reference Efthimiadis C, Basdanis G, Zatagias A, Tzeveleki I, Kosmidis C, Karamanlis E et al (2004) Manometric and clinical evaluation of patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s205–207CrossRef Efthimiadis C, Basdanis G, Zatagias A, Tzeveleki I, Kosmidis C, Karamanlis E et al (2004) Manometric and clinical evaluation of patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s205–207CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision
Authors
M. X. Bjoern
S. K. Perdawood
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02147-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2020 Go to the issue