Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Basic Surgery | Original Article

Current state of robotic use in inguinal hernia repair: a survey of minimally invasive hernia surgeons

Authors: Priscila Rodrigues Armijo, Bhavani Pokala, Laura Flores, Salim Hosein, Dmitry Oleynikov

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Little is known about how robot technology is employed by surgeons in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). We evaluated the needs of established robotic surgeons and of those who are new to this technology. A survey was designed and sent electronically to MIS surgeons. Questions included fellowship training, area of expertise, experience with robotic simulation and in clinical use, mentorship, likelihood of switching to a different approach, and expectations for the robot. Descriptive analysis was conducted using STATA/MP 15.1. 189 interviewees self-identified as hernia surgeons. 73.8% had additional fellowship, with majority practicing for 3–6 years (54%). Nearly 40% were MIS surgeons (N = 73), followed by general surgery (34.4%), and bariatrics (13.8%). 146 interviewees (77.7%) have used the daVinci® in clinical scenarios. Among robotic surgeons, majority were performing less than ten robotic cases per month. Inguinal hernia repairs were the leading procedures (49%), followed by foregut-related (19.5%), and colorectal-related surgeries (17.5%). Nearly 40% of surgeons stated inguinal hernia repairs to be the most often performed procedure using the robot. Nearly 40% of open and laparoscopic hernia surgeons are willing to adopt robotic-assisted procedures for their inguinal hernia repairs. Level 1 evidence (47.9%) and cost (24.1%) were the most pressing needs for robotic research. Majority of interviewees have used the daVinci® in clinical settings. Hernia repair remains the primary application of the robot in general surgery, among specialized surgeons. Over 40% of hernia surgeons are interested in switching to robotic technology over its open or laparoscopic counterparts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRef Armijo PR, Pagkratis S, Boilesen E, Tanner T, Oleynikov D (2018) Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs. Surg Endosc 32(4):2106–2113CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kelley WE Jr (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12(4):351–357PubMedPubMedCentral Kelley WE Jr (1990s) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12(4):351–357PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kevric J, Papa N, Toshniwal S, Perera M (2018) Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons. ANZ J Surg 88(4):E298–E302CrossRef Kevric J, Papa N, Toshniwal S, Perera M (2018) Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons. ANZ J Surg 88(4):E298–E302CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T et al (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203(3):313–317 (discussion 317) CrossRef Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T et al (2012) Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 203(3):313–317 (discussion 317) CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Miller DC, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Trends in the diffusion of laparoscopic nephrectomy. JAMA 295(21):2480–2482CrossRef Miller DC, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Hollenbeck BK (2006) Trends in the diffusion of laparoscopic nephrectomy. JAMA 295(21):2480–2482CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):2S–15SCrossRef Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):2S–15SCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Casarin J, Multinu F, Ubl DS et al (2018) Adoption of minimally invasive surgery and decrease in surgical morbidity for endometrial cancer treatment in the united states. Obstet Gynecol 131(2):304–311CrossRef Casarin J, Multinu F, Ubl DS et al (2018) Adoption of minimally invasive surgery and decrease in surgical morbidity for endometrial cancer treatment in the united states. Obstet Gynecol 131(2):304–311CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16395CrossRef Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF (2011) Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS ONE 6(1):e16395CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22(5):827–836CrossRef Gamagami R, Dickens E, Gonzalez A et al (2018) Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes. Hernia 22(5):827–836CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRef Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Newman RM, Umer A, Bozzuto BJ, Dilungo JL, Ellner S (2016) Surgical value of elective minimally invasive gallbladder removal: a cost analysis of traditional 4-port vs single-incision and robotically assisted cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):303–308CrossRef Newman RM, Umer A, Bozzuto BJ, Dilungo JL, Ellner S (2016) Surgical value of elective minimally invasive gallbladder removal: a cost analysis of traditional 4-port vs single-incision and robotically assisted cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):303–308CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRef Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC (2017) Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc 31(1):185–192CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, SAGES Robotic Task Force, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2019) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367CrossRef Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, SAGES Robotic Task Force, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2019) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy: training of residents in use of the robotic platform. Int J Med Robot 10(1):88–92CrossRef Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy: training of residents in use of the robotic platform. Int J Med Robot 10(1):88–92CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Muller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRef Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Muller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ (2014) Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC davis experience. Int J Med Robot 10(2):218–222CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current state of robotic use in inguinal hernia repair: a survey of minimally invasive hernia surgeons
Authors
Priscila Rodrigues Armijo
Bhavani Pokala
Laura Flores
Salim Hosein
Dmitry Oleynikov
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00709-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Updates in Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue