Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Review Article

The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery

Authors: Luigi Pugliese, Stefania Marconi, Erika Negrello, Valeria Mauri, Andrea Peri, Virginia Gallo, Ferdinando Auricchio, Andrea Pietrabissa

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of 3D printing is gaining considerable success in many medical fields including surgery. Here, the technology was introduced for increasing the level of anatomical understanding thanks to the inherent characteristics of 3D printed models: these are highly accurate and customized reproductions, being obtained from own radiological imaging of patients, and are solid graspable objects allowing for free manipulation on part of the user. The resulting tactile feedbacks significantly help the comprehension of anatomical details, especially the spatial relations between structures. In this regard, they proved to be more effective than conventional 2D imaging and 3D virtual models. To date, an increasing number of applications have been successfully tested in many surgical disciplines, extending the range of possible uses to pre-operative planning, counselling with patients, education of students and residents, surgical training, intraoperative navigation and others; in recent years, 3D printing was also employed for creating surgical tools and reproducing anatomical parts to be used, respectively, as templates or guides for specific tasks of the surgery and individualized implantable materials in reconstructive procedures. Future expectations concern on one side the reduction of manufacturing costs and time to further increase the accessibility of 3D printing, while on the other the development of novel techniques and materials suitable for 3D printing of biological structures by which recreating the architecture and functionality of real human organs and tissues.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Doi K (2006) Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol 51:R5–R27CrossRefPubMed Doi K (2006) Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology. Phys Med Biol 51:R5–R27CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Giesel FL (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010(5):335–341CrossRef Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Giesel FL (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010(5):335–341CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pietrabissa A, Marconi S, Peri A, Pugliese L, Auricchio F (2015) From CT scanning to 3-D printing technology for the pre-operative planning in laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 30(1):366–371CrossRefPubMed Pietrabissa A, Marconi S, Peri A, Pugliese L, Auricchio F (2015) From CT scanning to 3-D printing technology for the pre-operative planning in laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 30(1):366–371CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39:704–711 Ventola CL (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39:704–711
7.
go back to reference Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86:3240–3253CrossRefPubMed Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86:3240–3253CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kappers AM (2011) Human perception of shape from touch. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:31063114CrossRef Kappers AM (2011) Human perception of shape from touch. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:31063114CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meijer F, Van der Lubbe RH (2011) Active exploration improves perceptual sensitivity for visual 3D objects in visual recognition tasks. Vision Res 51:2431–2439CrossRefPubMed Meijer F, Van der Lubbe RH (2011) Active exploration improves perceptual sensitivity for visual 3D objects in visual recognition tasks. Vision Res 51:2431–2439CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M et al (2017) Value of 3D-printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg Endosc 31(10):4102–4110CrossRefPubMed Marconi S, Pugliese L, Botti M et al (2017) Value of 3D-printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy. Surg Endosc 31(10):4102–4110CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Malik HH, Darwood ARJ, Shaunak S, Kulatilake P, El-Hilly AA, Mulki O, Baskaradas A (2015) Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 199:512–522CrossRefPubMed Malik HH, Darwood ARJ, Shaunak S, Kulatilake P, El-Hilly AA, Mulki O, Baskaradas A (2015) Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 199:512–522CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Li Chi, Cheung Fung, Fan Vei Chen, Ka Kit Leung G (2017) Application of three-dimensional printing in surgery. Surg Innov 24(1):82–88CrossRefPubMed Li Chi, Cheung Fung, Fan Vei Chen, Ka Kit Leung G (2017) Application of three-dimensional printing in surgery. Surg Innov 24(1):82–88CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H et al (2016) Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159(6):1485–1500CrossRefPubMed Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H et al (2016) Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159(6):1485–1500CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Loke YH, Nath DS, Kim PCW, Sable CA (2015) Three-dimensional printing of intracardiac defects from three-dimensional echocardiographic images: feasibility and relative accuracy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:392–397CrossRefPubMed Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Loke YH, Nath DS, Kim PCW, Sable CA (2015) Three-dimensional printing of intracardiac defects from three-dimensional echocardiographic images: feasibility and relative accuracy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:392–397CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kong X, Nie L, Zhang H et al (2016) Do three-dimensional visualization and three-dimensional printing improve hepatic segment anatomy teaching? A randomized controlled study. J Surg Educ. 73:264–269CrossRefPubMed Kong X, Nie L, Zhang H et al (2016) Do three-dimensional visualization and three-dimensional printing improve hepatic segment anatomy teaching? A randomized controlled study. J Surg Educ. 73:264–269CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lim KH, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, Adams JW, McMenamin PG (2016) Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 9:213–221CrossRefPubMed Lim KH, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, Adams JW, McMenamin PG (2016) Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 9:213–221CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fasel JH, Aguiar D, Kiss-Bodolay D et al (2016) Adapting anatomy teaching to surgical trends: a combination of classical dissection, medical imaging, and 3D-printing technologies. Surg Radiol Anat 38:361–367CrossRefPubMed Fasel JH, Aguiar D, Kiss-Bodolay D et al (2016) Adapting anatomy teaching to surgical trends: a combination of classical dissection, medical imaging, and 3D-printing technologies. Surg Radiol Anat 38:361–367CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jones DB, Sung R, Weinberg C, Korelitz T, Andrews R (2016) Three-dimensional modeling may improve surgical education and clinical practice. Surg Innov. 23:189–195CrossRefPubMed Jones DB, Sung R, Weinberg C, Korelitz T, Andrews R (2016) Three-dimensional modeling may improve surgical education and clinical practice. Surg Innov. 23:189–195CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Garcia J, Yang Z, Mongrain R (2018) Lachapelle K (2018) 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Stel 4:27–40CrossRefPubMed Garcia J, Yang Z, Mongrain R (2018) Lachapelle K (2018) 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Stel 4:27–40CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Langridge B, Mamin S, Coumbe B et al (2018) Systematic review of the use of 3 dimensional printing in surgical teaching assessment. J Surg Educ 75:209–221CrossRefPubMed Langridge B, Mamin S, Coumbe B et al (2018) Systematic review of the use of 3 dimensional printing in surgical teaching assessment. J Surg Educ 75:209–221CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rasheed K, Mix D, Chandra A (2015) Numerous applications of 3D printing in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 29(4):643–644CrossRef Rasheed K, Mix D, Chandra A (2015) Numerous applications of 3D printing in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 29(4):643–644CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pugliese L, Marconi S, Peri A, Botti M, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa A. Value of 3D-printing in the management of visceral aneurysms. In: Marone EM et al., editors 3D-printing for complex vascular disease, in press (Minerva Ed.) Pugliese L, Marconi S, Peri A, Botti M, Auricchio F, Pietrabissa A. Value of 3D-printing in the management of visceral aneurysms. In: Marone EM et al., editors 3D-printing for complex vascular disease, in press (Minerva Ed.)
24.
go back to reference Itagaki MW (2015) Using 3DP models for planning and guidance during endovascular intervention: a technical advance. Diagn Intervent Radiol 21(4):338–341CrossRef Itagaki MW (2015) Using 3DP models for planning and guidance during endovascular intervention: a technical advance. Diagn Intervent Radiol 21(4):338–341CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Owen SL, Aziz T (2014) Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg 120:489CrossRefPubMed Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Owen SL, Aziz T (2014) Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg 120:489CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Grunert R, Strauss G, Moeckel H et al (2006) Elephant-an anatomical electronic phantom as simulation-system for otologic surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:4408PubMed Grunert R, Strauss G, Moeckel H et al (2006) Elephant-an anatomical electronic phantom as simulation-system for otologic surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:4408PubMed
Metadata
Title
The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery
Authors
Luigi Pugliese
Stefania Marconi
Erika Negrello
Valeria Mauri
Andrea Peri
Virginia Gallo
Ferdinando Auricchio
Andrea Pietrabissa
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0586-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Updates in Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue