Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry

Authors: Marco Braga, Luigi Beretta, Nicolò Pecorelli, Marianna Maspero, Umberto Casiraghi, Felice Borghi, Luca Pellegrino, Stefano Bona, Roberta Monzani, Gianluigi Ferrari, Danilo Radrizzani, Riccardo Iuliani, Carlo Bima, Marco Scatizzi, Giancarlo Missana, Marco Azzola Guicciardi, Andrea Muratore, Michele Crespi, Hedayat Bouzari, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Ferdinando Ficari, On behalf of PeriOperative Italian Society Group

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Previous studies reported that enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) is safe in elderly who did not require a specifically tailored protocol. In previous studies, elderly have been considered as a homogeneous cohort and the cut-off value to identify them was different. The aim of the present study is to assess the compliance to ERP and its impact on postoperative outcome in three subgroups of elderly patients with increasing ages. Prospectively collected data entered in an electronic Italian registry specifically designed for ERP were reviewed. 315 elderly patients undergoing elective colorectal resection were divided into three groups. Group 1: 71–75 years (n = 105), Group 2: 76–80 years (n = 117), Group 3: over 80 years (n = 93). Primary endpoints of the study were adherence to ERP and time to readiness for discharge (TRD). Compliance to ERP was similar in the three groups. No difference among groups was found for mortality, overall morbidity, major complications, reoperation rate and readmission rate. Median TRD and length of hospital stay (LOS) were progressively longer with increasing age (p = 0.018 and p = 0.078, respectively). Increasing age did not impact on adherence to ERP and postoperative morbidity, but delayed both TRD and LOS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Faiz O, Haji A, Bottle A et al (2011) Elective colonic surgery for cancer in the elderly: an investigation into postoperative mortality in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2007. Colorectal Dis 13:779–785CrossRefPubMed Faiz O, Haji A, Bottle A et al (2011) Elective colonic surgery for cancer in the elderly: an investigation into postoperative mortality in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2007. Colorectal Dis 13:779–785CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Smith JJ et al (2006) Prediction oof postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 29:816–824CrossRef Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Smith JJ et al (2006) Prediction oof postoperative mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 29:816–824CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Tokomitsu A, Tang T (2012) Assessment for frailty is useful for predicting morbidity in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection whose comorbidities are already optimized. Am J Surg 204:139–143CrossRefPubMed Tan KY, Kawamura YJ, Tokomitsu A, Tang T (2012) Assessment for frailty is useful for predicting morbidity in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection whose comorbidities are already optimized. Am J Surg 204:139–143CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Veenhof AAFA, Vlug MS, Van Der Pas MHGM et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefPubMed Veenhof AAFA, Vlug MS, Van Der Pas MHGM et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007635 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007635
6.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440CrossRefPubMed Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery Program in Colorectal Surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541CrossRefPubMed Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery Program in Colorectal Surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed
9.
go back to reference Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114CrossRefPubMed Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH et al (2014) A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis 16:947–956CrossRefPubMed Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH et al (2014) A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis 16:947–956CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Braga M, Pecorelli N, Scatizzi M et al (2016) Enhanced recovery program in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery Results from the Perioperative Italian Society registry. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3766-9 Braga M, Pecorelli N, Scatizzi M et al (2016) Enhanced recovery program in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery Results from the Perioperative Italian Society registry. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-016-3766-9
13.
go back to reference Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M et al (2013) Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 23:259–265CrossRef Feroci F, Lenzi E, Baraghini M et al (2013) Fast-track surgery in real life: how patient factors influence outcomes and compliance with an enhanced recovery clinical pathway after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 23:259–265CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Beak SJ, Kim SH, Kim SY et al (2013) The safety of a “fast-track” program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is comparable in older patients as in younger patients. Surg Endosc 27:1225–1232CrossRef Beak SJ, Kim SH, Kim SY et al (2013) The safety of a “fast-track” program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is comparable in older patients as in younger patients. Surg Endosc 27:1225–1232CrossRef
15.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fiore JF, Faragher IG, Bialocerkowski A et al (2013) Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 37:2927–2934CrossRefPubMed Fiore JF, Faragher IG, Bialocerkowski A et al (2013) Time to readiness for discharge is a valid and reliable measure of short-term recovery after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 37:2927–2934CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L et al (2001) Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 358:1487–1492CrossRefPubMed Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L et al (2001) Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 358:1487–1492CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection. Results from an International Registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159CrossRef ERAS Compliance Group (2015) The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection. Results from an International Registry. Ann Surg 261:1153–1159CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Ann Surg 254:868–875CrossRefPubMed Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Ann Surg 254:868–875CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery program: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery program: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 32:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W et al (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1686–1693CrossRefPubMed Vignali A, Braga M, Zuliani W et al (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery modifies risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1686–1693CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 229:174–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 229:174–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Jesus E, Karliczek A, Matos D et al (2004) Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD002100 Jesus E, Karliczek A, Matos D et al (2004) Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD002100
25.
go back to reference Walter CJ, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Pinkney TD et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:2366–2372CrossRefPubMed Walter CJ, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Pinkney TD et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27:2366–2372CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference De Oliveira GS, Castro-Alves LJ, Nader A et al (2014) Transversus abdominis plane block to ameliorate postoperative pain outcomes after laparoscopic surgery. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 118:454–463CrossRefPubMed De Oliveira GS, Castro-Alves LJ, Nader A et al (2014) Transversus abdominis plane block to ameliorate postoperative pain outcomes after laparoscopic surgery. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 118:454–463CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Haines KJ, Skinner EH, Berney S (2013) Association of postoperative pulmonary complications with delayed mobilisation following major abdominal surgery: an observational cohort study. Physiotherapy 99:119–125CrossRefPubMed Haines KJ, Skinner EH, Berney S (2013) Association of postoperative pulmonary complications with delayed mobilisation following major abdominal surgery: an observational cohort study. Physiotherapy 99:119–125CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zaouter C, Kaneva P, Carli F (2009) Less urinary tract infection by earlier removal of bladder catheter in surgical patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:542–548CrossRefPubMed Zaouter C, Kaneva P, Carli F (2009) Less urinary tract infection by earlier removal of bladder catheter in surgical patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 34:542–548CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Enhanced recovery pathway in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: is there an effect of increasing ages? Results from the perioperative Italian Society Registry
Authors
Marco Braga
Luigi Beretta
Nicolò Pecorelli
Marianna Maspero
Umberto Casiraghi
Felice Borghi
Luca Pellegrino
Stefano Bona
Roberta Monzani
Gianluigi Ferrari
Danilo Radrizzani
Riccardo Iuliani
Carlo Bima
Marco Scatizzi
Giancarlo Missana
Marco Azzola Guicciardi
Andrea Muratore
Michele Crespi
Hedayat Bouzari
Andrea Pisani Ceretti
Ferdinando Ficari
On behalf of PeriOperative Italian Society Group
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0474-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Updates in Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue