Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2013

01-12-2013

Time to Readiness for Discharge is a Valid and Reliable Measure of Short-Term Recovery After Colorectal Surgery

Authors: Julio F. Fiore Jr., Ian G. Faragher, Andrea Bialocerkowski, Laura Browning, Linda Denehy

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Short-term recovery after colorectal surgery has been traditionally investigated through length of stay (LOS). However, this measure is influenced by several confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity and reliability of assessing the time to achieve standardized discharge criteria (time to readiness for discharge, or TRD) as a measure of short-term recovery. In a secondary analysis, we compared sample size requirements for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TRD or LOS as outcome measures.

Methods

Seventy patients participated in the construct validity study and 21 patients participated in the reliability study. TRD was defined as the number of days to achieve discharge criteria previously defined by consensus. Construct validity was investigated by testing six hypothesis based on the assumption that TRD measures short-term recovery. Reliability was calculated by comparing measures of TRD by two independent assessors. Variability estimates (standard deviations) of LOS and TRD were used for sample size calculations.

Results

Five of the six hypotheses were supported by the data (p < 0.05). Interobserver reliability was excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.99). Sample size estimations showed that RCTs using TRD as an outcome measure require approximately 23 % less participants compared to RCTs using LOS.

Conclusions

The results of this research support the construct-validity and reliability of TRD as a measure of short-term recovery. Using TRD as an alternative to LOS may reduce sample size requirements in future RCTs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carli F, Mayo N (2001) Editorial. I. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: What are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 87:531–533PubMedCrossRef Carli F, Mayo N (2001) Editorial. I. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: What are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 87:531–533PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A et al (2007) Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:368–372PubMedCrossRef MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A et al (2007) Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:368–372PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2008) Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:795–800PubMedCrossRef King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2008) Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:795–800PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maessen JM, Dejong CH, Kessels AG et al (2008) Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs. World J Surg 32:971–975PubMedCrossRef Maessen JM, Dejong CH, Kessels AG et al (2008) Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs. World J Surg 32:971–975PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K et al (2002) Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 97:540–549PubMedCrossRef Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K et al (2002) Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 97:540–549PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schonherr ME et al (2007) Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:192–200PubMedCrossRef Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schonherr ME et al (2007) Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:192–200PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:1469–1474PubMedCrossRef MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:1469–1474PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Noblett SE, Snowden C, Shenton B et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 93:1069–1076PubMedCrossRef Noblett SE, Snowden C, Shenton B et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 93:1069–1076PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS et al (2005) Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 95:634–642PubMedCrossRef Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS et al (2005) Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 95:634–642PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Challand C, Struthers R, Sneyd JR et al (2012) Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 108:53–62PubMedCrossRef Challand C, Struthers R, Sneyd JR et al (2012) Randomized controlled trial of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in aerobically fit and unfit patients having major colorectal surgery. Br J Anaesth 108:53–62PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Shoshtari KZ et al (2011) Intraperitoneal local anesthetic improves recovery after colon resection: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 254:28–38PubMedCrossRef Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Shoshtari KZ et al (2011) Intraperitoneal local anesthetic improves recovery after colon resection: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 254:28–38PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 98:1068–1078PubMedCrossRef Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 98:1068–1078PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fiore JFJ, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L et al (2012) Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi technique. Dis Colon Rectum 55:416–423PubMedCrossRef Fiore JFJ, Bialocerkowski A, Browning L et al (2012) Criteria to determine readiness for hospital discharge following colorectal surgery: an international consensus using the Delphi technique. Dis Colon Rectum 55:416–423PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lang M, Niskanen M, Miettinen P et al (2001) Outcome and resource utilization in gastroenterological surgery. Br J Surg 88:1006–1014PubMedCrossRef Lang M, Niskanen M, Miettinen P et al (2001) Outcome and resource utilization in gastroenterological surgery. Br J Surg 88:1006–1014PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Machin D, Campbell M, Tan S et al (2008) Sample size tables for clinical studies, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, HobokenCrossRef Machin D, Campbell M, Tan S et al (2008) Sample size tables for clinical studies, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, HobokenCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110PubMedCrossRef Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A (1998) Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 17:101–110PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26:217–238PubMedCrossRef Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26:217–238PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wittes J (2002) Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiol Rev 24:39–53PubMedCrossRef Wittes J (2002) Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiol Rev 24:39–53PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gatt M, Anderson ADG, Reddy BS et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92:1354–1362PubMedCrossRef Gatt M, Anderson ADG, Reddy BS et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92:1354–1362PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zutshi M, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 189:268–272PubMedCrossRef Zutshi M, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 189:268–272PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J et al (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J et al (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.​1002/​14651858
27.
go back to reference Jestin P, Nilsson J, Heurgren M et al (2005) Emergency surgery for colonic cancer in a defined population. Br J Surg 92:94–100PubMedCrossRef Jestin P, Nilsson J, Heurgren M et al (2005) Emergency surgery for colonic cancer in a defined population. Br J Surg 92:94–100PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Coco C, Verbo A, Manno A et al (2005) Impact of emergency surgery in the outcome of rectal and left colon carcinoma. World J Surg 29:1458–1464PubMedCrossRef Coco C, Verbo A, Manno A et al (2005) Impact of emergency surgery in the outcome of rectal and left colon carcinoma. World J Surg 29:1458–1464PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schmelzer TM, Mostafa G, Lincourt AE et al (2008) Factors affecting length of stay following colonic resection. J Surg Res 146:195–201PubMedCrossRef Schmelzer TM, Mostafa G, Lincourt AE et al (2008) Factors affecting length of stay following colonic resection. J Surg Res 146:195–201PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rickard MJFX, Dent OF, Sinclair G et al (2004) Background and perioperative risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after resection of colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 74:4–9PubMedCrossRef Rickard MJFX, Dent OF, Sinclair G et al (2004) Background and perioperative risk factors for prolonged hospital stay after resection of colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 74:4–9PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J et al (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96:197–205PubMedCrossRef Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J et al (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96:197–205PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2010) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840CrossRef Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2010) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMedCrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29:434–440PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Boulind CE, Yeo M, Burkill C et al (2011) Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e103–e110CrossRef Boulind CE, Yeo M, Burkill C et al (2011) Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e103–e110CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Bartels SAL, Wind J et al (2012) Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 14:1001–1008PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Bartels SAL, Wind J et al (2012) Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 14:1001–1008PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV et al (2002) Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 18:147–152PubMedCrossRef Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV et al (2002) Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 18:147–152PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J et al (2007) Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 99:500–508PubMedCrossRef Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J et al (2007) Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 99:500–508PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308PubMedCrossRef King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Browning L, Denehy L, Scholes RL (2007) The quantity of early upright mobilisation performed following upper abdominal surgery is low: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 53:47–52PubMedCrossRef Browning L, Denehy L, Scholes RL (2007) The quantity of early upright mobilisation performed following upper abdominal surgery is low: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 53:47–52PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L et al (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L et al (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F (2007) Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:665–673PubMedCrossRef Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F (2007) Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:665–673PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:843–851PubMedCrossRef Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) ‘Liberal’ vs. ‘restrictive’ perioperative fluid therapy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:843–851PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Srinivasa S, Taylor MHG, Sammour T et al (2010) Oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid administration in colorectal surgery: critical appraisal of published clinical trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:4–13PubMedCrossRef Srinivasa S, Taylor MHG, Sammour T et al (2010) Oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid administration in colorectal surgery: critical appraisal of published clinical trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:4–13PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Noblett SE, Watson DS, Huong H et al (2006) Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 8:563–569PubMedCrossRef Noblett SE, Watson DS, Huong H et al (2006) Pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 8:563–569PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mathur S, Plank LD, McCall JL et al (2010) Randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 97:485–494PubMedCrossRef Mathur S, Plank LD, McCall JL et al (2010) Randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 97:485–494PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L et al (2008) Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:1083–1089PubMedCrossRef Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L et al (2008) Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:1083–1089PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Paddison JS, Sammour T, Kahokehr A et al (2011) Development and validation of the surgical recovery scale (SRS). J Surg Res 167:e85–e91PubMedCrossRef Paddison JS, Sammour T, Kahokehr A et al (2011) Development and validation of the surgical recovery scale (SRS). J Surg Res 167:e85–e91PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kahokehr A, Robertson P, Sammour T et al (2010) Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons. Colorectal Dis 13:1308–1313CrossRef Kahokehr A, Robertson P, Sammour T et al (2010) Perioperative care: a survey of New Zealand and Australian colorectal surgeons. Colorectal Dis 13:1308–1313CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Time to Readiness for Discharge is a Valid and Reliable Measure of Short-Term Recovery After Colorectal Surgery
Authors
Julio F. Fiore Jr.
Ian G. Faragher
Andrea Bialocerkowski
Laura Browning
Linda Denehy
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2208-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

World Journal of Surgery 12/2013 Go to the issue