Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 4/2013

01-12-2013 | Review Article

A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome

Author: Filippo Pucciani

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this review is to characterize the functional results and “anterior resection syndrome” (ARS) after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. The purpose of sphincter-saving operations is to save the anal sphincters by avoiding the need for rectal abdomino-perineal resection with a permanent stoma. A variety of alternative techniques have been proposed and, today, ultra-low anterior resections of the rectum are commonplace. Inevitably rectal resections modify anorectal physiology. The backdrop of the functional asset for ultralow anterior resections is related to a small neorectal capacity with high endo-neorectal pressures that act together on a weakened sphincteric mechanism. Sometimes a defecation disorder called ARS may be induced and the patient experiences an extremely low quality of life. Impaired bowel function is usually provoked either by colonic dysmotility, neorectal reservoir dysfunction, anal sphincter damage or by a combination of these factors. Surgical technique defects can contribute to these possible causes: anastomotic ischemia, short length of the descending colon and stretching of neorectal mesentery may play a role. Unfortunately, there is no therapeutic algorithm or gold standard treatment that may be used for ARS. Nevertheless, it is rational to use conservative therapy first and then resort to surgery. Drugs, rehabilitative treatment and sacral neuromodulation may be used; after failure of conservative methods, surgical treatment can be considered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J et al (2007) Prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy. Ann Surg 245:88–93PubMedCrossRef Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J et al (2007) Prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy. Ann Surg 245:88–93PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612PubMedCrossRef Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cutait DE, Figliolini FG (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342PubMedCrossRef Cutait DE, Figliolini FG (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mason AY (1972) Trans-sphincteric exposure for low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:974PubMed Mason AY (1972) Trans-sphincteric exposure for low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:974PubMed
5.
go back to reference Parks AG (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:975–976PubMed Parks AG (1972) Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 65:975–976PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F et al (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378PubMedCrossRef Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F et al (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim MK, Lim DJ, Yun SH et al (2001) Ultralow anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: functional and oncological results. Int J Colorect Dis 16:234–237CrossRef Kim MK, Lim DJ, Yun SH et al (2001) Ultralow anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancer: functional and oncological results. Int J Colorect Dis 16:234–237CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Morihiro M, Koda K, Seike K et al (2008) Characteristics findings on defecography according to reconstruction method and defecatory disorders following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:883–892PubMedCrossRef Morihiro M, Koda K, Seike K et al (2008) Characteristics findings on defecography according to reconstruction method and defecatory disorders following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:883–892PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kusunoki M, Okamoto T, Yoshikawa H (1996) Defecographic assessment after colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:971–974PubMedCrossRef Kusunoki M, Okamoto T, Yoshikawa H (1996) Defecographic assessment after colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Surg Today 26:971–974PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference De la Fuente SG, Mantyh CR (2007) Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what’s the best? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:221–230PubMedCrossRef De la Fuente SG, Mantyh CR (2007) Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what’s the best? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:221–230PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Bologna A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (1993) Anorectal physiology following sphincter saving operations for rectal cancer. Dig Surg 10:33–38CrossRef Pucciani F, Bologna A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C (1993) Anorectal physiology following sphincter saving operations for rectal cancer. Dig Surg 10:33–38CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ et al (1995) Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38:411–418PubMedCrossRef Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ et al (1995) Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38:411–418PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bharucha AE (2006) Pelvic floor: anatomy and function. Neurogatroenterol Motil 18:507–519CrossRef Bharucha AE (2006) Pelvic floor: anatomy and function. Neurogatroenterol Motil 18:507–519CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stebbing JF, Brading AF, Mortensen NJ (1996) Nitric oxide and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex: retrograde neuronal tracing reveals a descending nitrergic rectoanal pathway in a guinea-pig model. Br J Surg 83:493–498PubMedCrossRef Stebbing JF, Brading AF, Mortensen NJ (1996) Nitric oxide and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex: retrograde neuronal tracing reveals a descending nitrergic rectoanal pathway in a guinea-pig model. Br J Surg 83:493–498PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P et al (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878PubMedCrossRef O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P et al (1992) Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 35:874–878PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Horgan AF, Molloy RG, Coulter J (1993) Nerve regeneration across colorectal anastomoses after low anterior resection in a canine model. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:167–169PubMedCrossRef Horgan AF, Molloy RG, Coulter J (1993) Nerve regeneration across colorectal anastomoses after low anterior resection in a canine model. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:167–169PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ (1994) Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1228–1231PubMedCrossRef Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ (1994) Decrease in the anorectal pressure gradient after low anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1228–1231PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Seow-Choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–610PubMedCrossRef Seow-Choen F, Goh HS (1995) Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 82:608–610PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tonelli F, Garcea A, Batignani G (2005) Different role of the colonic pouch for low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 9:15–20PubMedCrossRef Tonelli F, Garcea A, Batignani G (2005) Different role of the colonic pouch for low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 9:15–20PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW (2002) Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2282–2289PubMedCrossRef van Duijvendijk P, Slors JF, Taat CW (2002) Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2282–2289PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oya M, Sugamata Y, Komatsu J et al (2002) Poor neorectal evacuation as a cause of impaired defecatory function after low anterior resection: a study using scintigraphic assessment. Surg Today 32:111–117PubMedCrossRef Oya M, Sugamata Y, Komatsu J et al (2002) Poor neorectal evacuation as a cause of impaired defecatory function after low anterior resection: a study using scintigraphic assessment. Surg Today 32:111–117PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG et al (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1353–1365PubMedCrossRef Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG et al (2005) The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1353–1365PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Emmersten KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928CrossRef Emmersten KJ, Laurberg S (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 255:922–928CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 3:238–247CrossRef Sprangers MA, Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 3:238–247CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3 Ziv Y, Zbar A, Bar-Shavit Y, Igov I (2012) Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-012-0909-3
27.
go back to reference Lee WY, Takahashi T, Pappas T et al (2008) Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility: an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome? Surgery 143:778–783PubMedCrossRef Lee WY, Takahashi T, Pappas T et al (2008) Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility: an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome? Surgery 143:778–783PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bassotti G, De Roberto G, Chistolini F et al (2005) Case report: colonic manometry reveals abnormal propulsive behaviour after anterior resection of the rectum. Dig Liver Dis 37:124–128PubMedCrossRef Bassotti G, De Roberto G, Chistolini F et al (2005) Case report: colonic manometry reveals abnormal propulsive behaviour after anterior resection of the rectum. Dig Liver Dis 37:124–128PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Park YS (1998) Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:241–246PubMedCrossRef Lee SJ, Park YS (1998) Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:241–246PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Birnbaum EH, Myerson RJ, Fry RD et al (1994) Chronic effects of pelvic radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 37:909–915PubMedCrossRef Birnbaum EH, Myerson RJ, Fry RD et al (1994) Chronic effects of pelvic radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 37:909–915PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gervaz P, Rotholtz N, Pisano M et al (2001) Quantitative short term study of anal sphincter function after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 41:543–551 Gervaz P, Rotholtz N, Pisano M et al (2001) Quantitative short term study of anal sphincter function after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Arch Surg 41:543–551
32.
go back to reference Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404PubMedCrossRef Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lundby L, Krogh K, Jensen VJ et al (2005) Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1349–1352CrossRef Lundby L, Krogh K, Jensen VJ et al (2005) Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1349–1352CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bakx R, Doeksen A, Slors FM et al (2009) Neorectal irritability after short-term preoperative radiotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 104:133–141PubMedCrossRef Bakx R, Doeksen A, Slors FM et al (2009) Neorectal irritability after short-term preoperative radiotherapy and surgical resection for rectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 104:133–141PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Halböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M et al (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65CrossRef Halböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M et al (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA et al (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Sug 84:1449–1451CrossRef Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA et al (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Sug 84:1449–1451CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T et al (2004) Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a five-year follow up. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1578–1585PubMedCrossRef Hida J, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T et al (2004) Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a five-year follow up. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1578–1585PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–667PubMedCrossRef Fürst A, Burghofer K, Hutzel L, Jauch KW (2002) Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 45:660–667PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Murphy J, Hammond TM, Knowles CH et al (2007) Does anastomotic techniques influence anorectal function after sphincter-saving rectal cancer resection? A systematic review of evidence from randomized trials. J Am Coll Surg 204:673–680PubMedCrossRef Murphy J, Hammond TM, Knowles CH et al (2007) Does anastomotic techniques influence anorectal function after sphincter-saving rectal cancer resection? A systematic review of evidence from randomized trials. J Am Coll Surg 204:673–680PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resections for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16: CD006040 Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS (2008) Reconstructive techniques after rectal resections for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16: CD006040
41.
go back to reference Baker JW (1950) Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique. Arch Surg 61:143–157PubMedCrossRef Baker JW (1950) Low end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique. Arch Surg 61:143–157PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Büchler MW (1999) Transverse coloplasty pouch. A novel neorectal reservoir. Dig Surg 16:363–366PubMedCrossRef Z’graggen K, Maurer CA, Büchler MW (1999) Transverse coloplasty pouch. A novel neorectal reservoir. Dig Surg 16:363–366PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12:624–631PubMedCrossRef Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 12:624–631PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Mantyh CR, Hull TL, Fazio VW (2001) Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:37–42PubMedCrossRef Mantyh CR, Hull TL, Fazio VW (2001) Coloplasty in low colorectal anastomosis: manometric and functional comparison with straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:37–42PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tsang WWC, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Li MKV (2006) Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Ann Surg 243:353–358PubMedCrossRef Tsang WWC, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Li MKV (2006) Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Ann Surg 243:353–358PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Ho YH, Tsang C, Tang CL et al (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 43:169–173PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Tsang C, Tang CL et al (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 43:169–173PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR (1998) Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 41:888–891PubMedCrossRef Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR (1998) Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 41:888–891PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Brown SR, Seow-Choen F (2000) Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum. Semin Surg Oncol 19:376–385PubMedCrossRef Brown SR, Seow-Choen F (2000) Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum. Semin Surg Oncol 19:376–385PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P et al (2000) Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses. Surgery 127:291–295PubMedCrossRef Gamagami R, Istvan G, Cabarrot P et al (2000) Fecal continence following partial resection of the anal canal in distal rectal cancer: long-term results after coloanal anastomoses. Surgery 127:291–295PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B et al (2006) Long-term effect of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 49:345–352PubMedCrossRef Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B et al (2006) Long-term effect of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 49:345–352PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Heald B (2008) Autonomic nerve preservation in rectal cancer surgery—the forgotten part of the TME message. A practical “workshop” description for surgeons. Acta Chir Iugosl 55:11–16PubMedCrossRef Heald B (2008) Autonomic nerve preservation in rectal cancer surgery—the forgotten part of the TME message. A practical “workshop” description for surgeons. Acta Chir Iugosl 55:11–16PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Ehrenpreis ED, Chang D, Eichenwald E (2007) Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 50:641–649PubMedCrossRef Ehrenpreis ED, Chang D, Eichenwald E (2007) Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 50:641–649PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Hanauer SB (2008) The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 8:15–20PubMed Hanauer SB (2008) The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 8:15–20PubMed
55.
go back to reference Markland AD, Richter HE, Burgio KL et al (2008) Outcomes of combination treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 699.e1–699.e7 Markland AD, Richter HE, Burgio KL et al (2008) Outcomes of combination treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 699.e1–699.e7
56.
go back to reference Sze EH, Hobbs G (2009) Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:766–771PubMedCrossRef Sze EH, Hobbs G (2009) Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:766–771PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Ho YH, Chiang GM, Tan M, Low JY (1996) Biofeedback therapy for excessive stool frequency and incontinence following anterior resection or total colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1289–1292PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Chiang GM, Tan M, Low JY (1996) Biofeedback therapy for excessive stool frequency and incontinence following anterior resection or total colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1289–1292PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Allgayer H, Christoph FD, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for rectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175CrossRef Allgayer H, Christoph FD, Rohde W et al (2005) Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for rectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1168–1175CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S et al (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–1558PubMedCrossRef Pucciani F, Ringressi MN, Redditi S et al (2008) Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence after sphincter saving surgery for rectal cancer: encouraging results. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1552–1558PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Maris A, Devreese AM, D’Hoore A (2012) Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/codi.12036 Maris A, Devreese AM, D’Hoore A (2012) Treatment options to improve anorectal function following rectal resection: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​12036
61.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Bittorf B et al (2002) Bilateral sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence after low anterior rectum resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:430–434PubMedCrossRef Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Bittorf B et al (2002) Bilateral sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence after low anterior rectum resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 17:430–434PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence following anterior resection and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1027–1036PubMedCrossRef Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Sacral neuromodulation in treatment of fecal incontinence following anterior resection and chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1027–1036PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto AM et al (2006) Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:568–578PubMedCrossRef Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto AM et al (2006) Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:568–578PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Digennaro R, Tondo M, Cuccia F et al (2012) Coloanal anastomosis or abdominal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon’s pride or the patient’s quality of life? Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1007/s00384-012-1629-x PubMed Digennaro R, Tondo M, Cuccia F et al (2012) Coloanal anastomosis or abdominal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon’s pride or the patient’s quality of life? Int J Colorectal Dis. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-012-1629-x PubMed
Metadata
Title
A review on functional results of sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer: the anterior resection syndrome
Author
Filippo Pucciani
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0220-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Updates in Surgery 4/2013 Go to the issue