Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Insulins | Brief Report

Understanding Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation, Attitudes and Education Needs Among People Who Discontinue Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Results from an Online Patient Survey in the USA and UK

Authors: Aude Roborel de Climens, Emilie Pain, Anders Boss, Alka Shaunik

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires long-term treatment to achieve and maintain glycaemic control; however, up to 50% of people with T2DM discontinue treatment by 1 year. It is therefore important to understand the patient perspective of therapeutic adherence and persistence.

Methods

An online questionnaire was presented to people with T2DM in the USA and UK on PatientLive®, a platform of Carenity, an online patient community. Those who discontinued at least one T2DM treatment within the last 6 months answered open-ended questions aimed to assess the reasons for discontinuation, how discontinuation could have been prevented, and what would have improved the experience with the discontinued treatment. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed on respondents’ answers to these questions.

Results

Oral antidiabetics were the most commonly discontinued treatments (93/161), followed by insulin (40/161) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (13/161). Main reasons for treatment discontinuation overall were side effects (57/161), mostly gastrointestinal side effects and weight gain. The second most reported reason was drug efficacy issues (42/161). Key factors stated to prevent discontinuation were an improved care pathway (45/161) and more efficacious treatments with fewer side effects (41/161). In the USA, treatment cost played an important role in discontinuation (14/89) and discontinuation prevention (12/89). More information about T2DM and associated treatments (56/161), help with T2DM management (24/161), and increased and informative patient–physician interaction (12/161) would have been helpful for many respondents in both countries, while some patients noted that no additional information would have been useful to improve their understanding and experience with their T2DM treatment (64/161).

Conclusions

These results emphasise the need for focused medical education and improved communication to enhance patient experience and prevent treatment discontinuation. Understanding of attributes preferred by people with T2DM can help improve therapeutic adherence and outcomes with current medications, and guide development of future therapies.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Sabaté E, editor. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. Sabaté E, editor. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
5.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Henry RR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1299–307.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Polonsky WH, Henry RR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1299–307.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guerci B, Chanan N, Kaur S, Jasso-Mosqueda JG, Lew E. Lack of treatment persistence and treatment nonadherence as barriers to glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(2):437–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guerci B, Chanan N, Kaur S, Jasso-Mosqueda JG, Lew E. Lack of treatment persistence and treatment nonadherence as barriers to glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(2):437–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fowler MJ. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(2):77–82.CrossRef Fowler MJ. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(2):77–82.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Davies M, D'Alessio D, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemic in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;61:2461–98.PubMedCrossRef Davies M, D'Alessio D, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemic in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2018;61:2461–98.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9–16.PubMedCrossRef Nathan DM, DCCT/EDIC Research Group. The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9–16.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Montvida O, Shaw J, Atherton J, Stringer F, Paul S. Long-term trends in antidiabetes drug usage in the U.S.: real-world evidence in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:69–78.PubMedCrossRef Montvida O, Shaw J, Atherton J, Stringer F, Paul S. Long-term trends in antidiabetes drug usage in the U.S.: real-world evidence in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:69–78.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Janssen E, Longo D, Bardsley J, Bridges J. Education and patient preferences for treating type 2 diabetes: a stratified discrete-choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1729–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Janssen E, Longo D, Bardsley J, Bridges J. Education and patient preferences for treating type 2 diabetes: a stratified discrete-choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1729–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference WHO. Guidelines on second- and third-line medicines and type of insulin for the control of blood glucose levels in non-pregnant adults with diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. WHO. Guidelines on second- and third-line medicines and type of insulin for the control of blood glucose levels in non-pregnant adults with diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
13.
go back to reference Mansfield C, Sikirica M, Pugh A, et al. Patient preferences for attributes of type 2 diabetes mellitus medications in Germany and Spain: an online discrete-choice experiment survey. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8:1365–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mansfield C, Sikirica M, Pugh A, et al. Patient preferences for attributes of type 2 diabetes mellitus medications in Germany and Spain: an online discrete-choice experiment survey. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8:1365–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fifer S, Rose J, Hamrosi KK, Swain D. Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):675.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fifer S, Rose J, Hamrosi KK, Swain D. Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):675.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berard L, Bonnemaire M, Mical M, Edelman S. Insights into optimal basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes: results of a quantitative survey. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):301–8.PubMedCrossRef Berard L, Bonnemaire M, Mical M, Edelman S. Insights into optimal basal insulin titration in type 2 diabetes: results of a quantitative survey. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):301–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Russell-Jones D, Pouwer F, Khunti K. Identification of barriers to insulin therapy and approaches to overcoming them. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):488–96.PubMedCrossRef Russell-Jones D, Pouwer F, Khunti K. Identification of barriers to insulin therapy and approaches to overcoming them. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):488–96.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gadkari AS, McHorney CA. Medication nonfulfillment rates and reasons: narrative systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(3):683–705.PubMedCrossRef Gadkari AS, McHorney CA. Medication nonfulfillment rates and reasons: narrative systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26(3):683–705.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wong W. Exploring the potential of clinical pathways for diabetes. J Clinical Pathways. 2017;2(Suppl 1):S5–6. Wong W. Exploring the potential of clinical pathways for diabetes. J Clinical Pathways. 2017;2(Suppl 1):S5–6.
23.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Supplement 1):S1–212.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Supplement 1):S1–212.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ravoire S, Lang M, Perrin E, et al. Advantages and limitations of online communities of patients for research on health products. Therapie. 2017;72:135–43.PubMedCrossRef Ravoire S, Lang M, Perrin E, et al. Advantages and limitations of online communities of patients for research on health products. Therapie. 2017;72:135–43.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation, Attitudes and Education Needs Among People Who Discontinue Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Results from an Online Patient Survey in the USA and UK
Authors
Aude Roborel de Climens
Emilie Pain
Anders Boss
Alka Shaunik
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00843-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Diabetes Therapy 8/2020 Go to the issue