Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 1/2019

Open Access 01-02-2019 | Original Research

Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Hua Yang, Bing Tang, Chen Hong Xu, Anis Ahmed

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Antiplatelet therapy is very important following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). New generation P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor and prasugrel) might potentially replace clopidogrel for the treatment of post-interventional acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the post-interventional clinical outcomes and bleeding events observed with ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov were carefully searched for publications comparing the post-coronary interventional outcomes following ticagrelor versus prasugrel use in patients with T2DM. Adverse clinical outcomes and bleeding events were considered as the endpoints. Statistical analysis was carried out by the Revman software (version 5.3). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data during subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 2004 participants with T2DM were included in this analysis. Following PCI, mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.57–1.76; P = 0.99, I2 = 19%), myocardial infarction (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42–1.75; P = 0.67, I2 = 0%), major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42–1.27; P = 0.27, I2 = 0%), and stroke (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.20–2.59; P = 0.61, I2 = 0%) were not significantly different between ticagrelor and prasugrel. In addition, total bleeding events (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.55–1.40; P = 0.58, I2 = 6%), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined minor bleeding (OR 2.39, 95% CI 0.58–9.91; P = 0.23, I2 = 0%), TIMI defined major bleeding (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.27–7.45; P = 0.68, I2 = 0%), bleeding defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) major bleeding (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.22–1.36; P = 0.20, I2 = 0%), BARC minor bleeding (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.52–3.99; P = 0.48, I2 = 0%), and total minimal bleeding (OR 3.12, 95% CI 0.55–17.59; P = 0.20, I2 = 0%) were also not significantly different.

Conclusion

Ticagrelor and prasugrel were not associated with significantly different adverse clinical outcomes and bleeding events in these patients with T2DM. Therefore, both antiplatelet agents might safely be used in patients with T2DM following coronary intervention. However, this head-to-head comparison still remains a major challenge which should be resolved in larger clinical trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ko SQ, Valsdottir LR, Strom JB, et al. Meta-analysis of bleeding risk prediction scores in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention on dual antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2018;9149(18)31724-7. Ko SQ, Valsdottir LR, Strom JB, et al. Meta-analysis of bleeding risk prediction scores in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention on dual antiplatelet therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2018;9149(18)31724-7.
2.
go back to reference Xu Z, Gu J, Gao M, et al. Study on antiplatelet effect of a new thiophenopyridine platelets P2Y12 receptor antagonist DV-127. Thromb Res. 2018;170:192–9.CrossRef Xu Z, Gu J, Gao M, et al. Study on antiplatelet effect of a new thiophenopyridine platelets P2Y12 receptor antagonist DV-127. Thromb Res. 2018;170:192–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.CrossRef Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15.CrossRef Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120(25):2577–85.CrossRef Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K, et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation. 2009;120(25):2577–85.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569–619.CrossRef Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2569–619.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bundhun PK, Shi JX, Huang F. Head to head comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;18(1):80.CrossRef Bundhun PK, Shi JX, Huang F. Head to head comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;18(1):80.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sakurai R, Burazor I, Bonneau HN, Kaneda H. Head-to-head comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Cardiol. 2017;30(5):457–64.CrossRef Sakurai R, Burazor I, Bonneau HN, Kaneda H. Head-to-head comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Cardiol. 2017;30(5):457–64.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hu L, Chang L, Zhang Y, et al. Platelets express activated P2Y12 receptor in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;136(9):817–33.CrossRef Hu L, Chang L, Zhang Y, et al. Platelets express activated P2Y12 receptor in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;136(9):817–33.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tantry US, Navarese EP, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness following acute coronary syndromes. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(9):1312–9.CrossRef Tantry US, Navarese EP, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness following acute coronary syndromes. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(9):1312–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(14):932–6.CrossRef TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(14):932–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736–47.CrossRef Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736–47.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008. p. 187-241. Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2008. p. 187-241.
14.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):797–804.CrossRef Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(6):797–804.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Mavronasiou E, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2211–6.CrossRef Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Mavronasiou E, et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2211–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alexopoulos D, Moulias A, Koutsogiannis N, et al. Differential effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel on coronary blood flow velocity in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an exploratory study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):277–83.CrossRef Alexopoulos D, Moulias A, Koutsogiannis N, et al. Differential effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel on coronary blood flow velocity in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an exploratory study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(3):277–83.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bonello L, Laine M, Cluzel M, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor versus prasugrel to prevent periprocedural myonecrosis in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(3):339–43.CrossRef Bonello L, Laine M, Cluzel M, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor versus prasugrel to prevent periprocedural myonecrosis in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116(3):339–43.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Conrotto F, Bertaina M, Raposeiras-Roubin S, et al. Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;1:2048872618802783. Conrotto F, Bertaina M, Raposeiras-Roubin S, et al. Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;1:2048872618802783.
20.
go back to reference Dimitroulis D, Golabkesh M, Naguib D, et al. Safety and efficacy in prasugrel- versus ticagrelor-treated patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018;72(4):186–90.PubMed Dimitroulis D, Golabkesh M, Naguib D, et al. Safety and efficacy in prasugrel- versus ticagrelor-treated patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018;72(4):186–90.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Franchi F, Rollini F, Aggarwal N, et al. Pharmacodynamic comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the OPTIMUS (optimizing antiplatelet therapy in diabetes mellitus)-4 study. Circulation. 2016;134(11):780–92.CrossRef Franchi F, Rollini F, Aggarwal N, et al. Pharmacodynamic comparison of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the OPTIMUS (optimizing antiplatelet therapy in diabetes mellitus)-4 study. Circulation. 2016;134(11):780–92.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hochholzer W, Kleiner P, Younas I, et al. Randomized comparison of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor loading strategies for transitioning from cangrelor: the ExcelsiorLOAD2 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(2):121–9.CrossRef Hochholzer W, Kleiner P, Younas I, et al. Randomized comparison of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor loading strategies for transitioning from cangrelor: the ExcelsiorLOAD2 Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(2):121–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Laine M, Frère C, Toesca R, et al. Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in diabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome. A pharmacodynamic randomised study. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(2):273–8.CrossRef Laine M, Frère C, Toesca R, et al. Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in diabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome. A pharmacodynamic randomised study. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(2):273–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Motovska Z, Hlinomaz O, Miklik R, et al. Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 study. Circulation. 2016;134(21):1603–12.CrossRef Motovska Z, Hlinomaz O, Miklik R, et al. Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 study. Circulation. 2016;134(21):1603–12.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B, et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (rapid activity of platelet inhibitor drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1601–6.CrossRef Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B, et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (rapid activity of platelet inhibitor drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1601–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Perl L, Zemer-Wassercug N, Rechavia E, et al. Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015;39(1):1–7.CrossRef Perl L, Zemer-Wassercug N, Rechavia E, et al. Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015;39(1):1–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Song C, Sukul D, Seth M, et al. Ninety-day readmission and long-term mortality in medicare patients (≥ 65 years) treated with ticagrelor versus prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Blue Cross Blueshield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(11):1926–32.CrossRef Song C, Sukul D, Seth M, et al. Ninety-day readmission and long-term mortality in medicare patients (≥ 65 years) treated with ticagrelor versus prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Blue Cross Blueshield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium). Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(11):1926–32.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 201;130(25):2354-94. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 201;130(25):2354-94.
29.
go back to reference Clavijo LC, Maya J, Carlson G, et al. Platelet inhibition with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Hispanic patients with stable coronary artery disease with or without diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16(8):450–4.CrossRef Clavijo LC, Maya J, Carlson G, et al. Platelet inhibition with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Hispanic patients with stable coronary artery disease with or without diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16(8):450–4.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gaiz A, Mosawy S, Colson N, Singh I. Thrombotic and cardiovascular risks in type two diabetes; Role of platelet hyperactivity. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;94:679–86.CrossRef Gaiz A, Mosawy S, Colson N, Singh I. Thrombotic and cardiovascular risks in type two diabetes; Role of platelet hyperactivity. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;94:679–86.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vinik AI, Erbas T, Park TS, Nolan R, Pittenger GL. Platelet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(8):1476–85.CrossRef Vinik AI, Erbas T, Park TS, Nolan R, Pittenger GL. Platelet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(8):1476–85.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Roffman DS. Developments in Oral antiplatelet agents for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. J Pharm Pract. 2016;29(3):239–49.CrossRef Roffman DS. Developments in Oral antiplatelet agents for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. J Pharm Pract. 2016;29(3):239–49.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference D’Ascenzo F, Grosso A, Abu-Assi E, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding in ACS patients treated with PCI and prasugrel or ticagrelor: an analysis from the RENAMI registry. Int J Cardiol. 2018;273:29–33. D’Ascenzo F, Grosso A, Abu-Assi E, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding in ACS patients treated with PCI and prasugrel or ticagrelor: an analysis from the RENAMI registry. Int J Cardiol. 2018;273:29–33.
Metadata
Title
Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Hua Yang
Bing Tang
Chen Hong Xu
Anis Ahmed
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0537-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Diabetes Therapy 1/2019 Go to the issue