Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Research

Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Toujeo®) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Effectiveness in Switzerland

Authors: Peter Wiesli, Marcus Schories

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300, Toujeo®) is a long-acting, once-daily basal insulin with improved—more stable and smoother—pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared to insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and insulin degludec (IDeg). These properties have been shown to translate into an effective HbA1c reduction with the advantage of a lower risk of hypoglycemia in randomized controlled trials of Gla-300 versus Gla-100. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of Gla-300 under real-world conditions in Switzerland.

Methods

The prospective, observational, open-label, multicenter study TOP-2 explored the effectiveness of Gla-300 in adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled (HbA1c 7.5–10%) on their previous basal insulin in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The primary endpoints were the percentages of patients achieving a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of ≤ 6.1 mmol/L after 6 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints included changes in HbA1c, FPG, body weight, and insulin dose as well as hypoglycemia incidence and safety. Here we report the results for the Swiss patient cohort after 12 months of treatment with insulin glargine 300 U/mL.

Results

The 62 patients (33 men) had a mean age of 65 years, a mean diabetes duration of 14 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 31 kg/m2, and were mainly switched from Gla-100 (44%) to Gla-300. The most common concomitant oral anti-diabetes therapy was metformin (65%). The mean individual HbA1c target chosen by the investigators was 7.4%. After 12 months of therapy, Gla-300 significantly reduced mean HbA1c from 8.2% to 7.6% (p < 0.0001). Likewise, Gla-300 significantly reduced mean FPG from 9.1 mmol/L to 7.4 mmol/L (p < 0.0001). At study end, 32% of patients achieved FPG ≤ 6.1 mmol/L, 55% achieved FPG ≤ 7.2 mmol/L , and 57% achieved their individual HbA1c target. Gla-300 was uptitrated to a mean dose of 40 units per day. Symptomatic hypoglycemia incidence after 12 months was low at 9.7% and a rate of 0.23 events per patient year. Body weight remained stable and was not significantly altered during the study.

Conclusion

Upon switching basaI insulin to Gla-300, overall glucose control significantly improved and glycemic targets were achieved with a low rate of hypoglycemia in T2D patients under real-world conditions in Switzerland.

Funding

Sanofi–Aventis (Suisse) SA.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Becker RH, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units mL−1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units mL−1. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):637–43. Becker RH, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units mL−1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units mL−1. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):637–43.
3.
go back to reference Shiramoto M, et al. Single-dose new insulin glargine 300 U/mL provides prolonged, stable glycaemic control in Japanese and European people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(3):254–60.CrossRef Shiramoto M, et al. Single-dose new insulin glargine 300 U/mL provides prolonged, stable glycaemic control in Japanese and European people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(3):254–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bailey TS, et al. Morning administration of 0.4 U/kg/day insulin glargine 300 U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100 U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2017;44:15–21.CrossRef Bailey TS, et al. Morning administration of 0.4 U/kg/day insulin glargine 300 U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100 U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2017;44:15–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ritzel R, et al. Better glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs glargine 100 U/mL: 1-year patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION clinical studies in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):541–548.CrossRef Ritzel R, et al. Better glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs glargine 100 U/mL: 1-year patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION clinical studies in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):541–548.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yki-Jarvinen H, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3235–43.CrossRef Yki-Jarvinen H, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3235–43.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roussel R et al. Impact of background antihyperglycemic therapy on insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in insulin-naïve people with T2DM from the BRIGHT randomized study. Poster 1029-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA. Roussel R et al. Impact of background antihyperglycemic therapy on insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in insulin-naïve people with T2DM from the BRIGHT randomized study. Poster 1029-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA.
8.
go back to reference Rosenstock J et al. More similarities than differences testing insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus insulin degludec 100 units/mL in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes: the randomized head-to-head BRIGHT trial. Diabetes Care. 2018. Rosenstock J et al. More similarities than differences testing insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus insulin degludec 100 units/mL in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes: the randomized head-to-head BRIGHT trial. Diabetes Care. 2018.
9.
go back to reference Bolli GB et al. Lower hypoglycemia rates with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in insulin-naïve adults with T2DM on oral antihyperglycemic therapy ± GLP-1RA—the bright randomized study. Poster 1032-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA. Bolli GB et al. Lower hypoglycemia rates with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in insulin-naïve adults with T2DM on oral antihyperglycemic therapy ± GLP-1RA—the bright randomized study. Poster 1032-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA.
10.
go back to reference International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Guidance for industry—E10. Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials. May 2001. http://www.fda.gov. Accessed 14 May 2018. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Guidance for industry—E10. Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials. May 2001. http://​www.​fda.​gov. Accessed 14 May 2018.
11.
go back to reference Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1425–32.CrossRef Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1425–32.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Carls GS, et al. Understanding the gap between efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in real-world use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1469–78.CrossRef Carls GS, et al. Understanding the gap between efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in real-world use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1469–78.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sherman RE, et al. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2293–7.CrossRef Sherman RE, et al. Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2293–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhou FL, et al. Real-world evidence concerning clinical and economic outcomes of switching to insulin glargine 300 units/mL vs other basal insulins in patients with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(5):1293–7.CrossRef Zhou FL, et al. Real-world evidence concerning clinical and economic outcomes of switching to insulin glargine 300 units/mL vs other basal insulins in patients with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(5):1293–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blonde L, Zhou FL, Bosnyak Z, et al. Real-world evidence demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes of switching from insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Abstract ATTD8-0427 from the 11th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; 2018 Feb 14–17; Vienna, Austria. Blonde L, Zhou FL, Bosnyak Z, et al. Real-world evidence demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes of switching from insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Abstract ATTD8-0427 from the 11th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; 2018 Feb 14–17; Vienna, Austria.
16.
go back to reference Meneghini L, Zhou FL, Bosnyak Z, et al. Hypoglycemia risk associated with basal insulin use in type 2 diabetes (T2DM): the LIGHTNING study. Abstr ATTD8-0420 from the 11th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; 2018 February 14–17; Vienna, Austria. Meneghini L, Zhou FL, Bosnyak Z, et al. Hypoglycemia risk associated with basal insulin use in type 2 diabetes (T2DM): the LIGHTNING study. Abstr ATTD8-0420 from the 11th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; 2018 February 14–17; Vienna, Austria.
17.
go back to reference Seufert J, et al. Switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) improves glycemic control and reduces nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients (Pts) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT). Poster 1020-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA.. Seufert J, et al. Switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) improves glycemic control and reduces nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients (Pts) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT). Poster 1020-P presented at ADA 78th Scientific Sessions, 2018 June 22–26, Orlando, FL, USA..
18.
go back to reference World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
19.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–79.CrossRef Inzucchi SE, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–79.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schimke KE, et al. Compliance with guidelines for disease management in diabetes: results from the SwissDiab Registry. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1):e000454.CrossRef Schimke KE, et al. Compliance with guidelines for disease management in diabetes: results from the SwissDiab Registry. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1):e000454.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Khunti K, et al. Clinical inertia with regard to intensifying therapy in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(4):401–9.CrossRef Khunti K, et al. Clinical inertia with regard to intensifying therapy in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(4):401–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Khunti K, et al. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3411–7.CrossRef Khunti K, et al. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(11):3411–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brod M, et al. Perceptions of diabetes control among physicians and people with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin in Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(6):981–9.CrossRef Brod M, et al. Perceptions of diabetes control among physicians and people with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin in Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(6):981–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peyrot M, et al. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–9.CrossRef Peyrot M, et al. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–9.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080–6.CrossRef Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3080–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Khunti K, et al. Rates and predictors of hypoglycaemia in 27 585 people from 24 countries with insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the global HAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(9):907–15. Khunti K, et al. Rates and predictors of hypoglycaemia in 27 585 people from 24 countries with insulin-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the global HAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(9):907–15.
28.
go back to reference Fiesselmann A, et al. Real-world therapeutic benefits of patients on insulin glargine versus NPH insulin. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53(5):717–26.CrossRef Fiesselmann A, et al. Real-world therapeutic benefits of patients on insulin glargine versus NPH insulin. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53(5):717–26.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Yki-Jarvinen H, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: the EDITION 2 randomized 12-month trial including 6-month extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(12):1142–9.CrossRef Yki-Jarvinen H, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: the EDITION 2 randomized 12-month trial including 6-month extension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(12):1142–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Toujeo®) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Effectiveness in Switzerland
Authors
Peter Wiesli
Marcus Schories
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0518-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Diabetes Therapy 6/2018 Go to the issue