Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 2/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Original Research

A Real-World Anti-Diabetes Medication Cost Comparison Between Premixed Insulin Analogs and Long-Acting Insulin Analogs in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Database Analysis

Authors: Yue Gao, Ke Wang, Yun Chen, Li Shen, Jianing Hou, Jianwei Xuan, Bao Liu

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To assess and compare per-day anti-diabetic medication costs for Chinese type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) insulin-naïve patients between those who initiated premixed insulin analogs (“premixed group”) and those who initiated long-acting insulin analogs (“long-acting group”).

Methods

Data were obtained from an electronic medical record database between 2010.01.01 and 2015.06.30 covering medical encounter records from all general hospitals in a district from Shanghai, China. Insulin-naïve T2DM patients who were aged ≥ 18 years, treated with an oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) only during the baseline period (3 months prior to insulin initiation), and initiated premixed or long-acting insulin analogs were included. Patients were followed until index insulin discontinuation or 12 months after initiation, whichever came first. The t test and generalized linear models adjusting for propensity score (PS) (including baseline demographics, number of OAD classes, comorbidities, costs, and healthcare resource utilization) were used to examine the differences between the two insulin groups.

Results

A total of 570 and 185 patients were identified for the premixed and long-acting groups, with mean (SD) ages of 63.0 (12.8) and 61.1 (11.9) (P = 0.08) and male proportions of 47.4% and 51.4% (P = 0.35), respectively. During the baseline period, 19.3% of the premixed users had T2DM-related hospitalizations, while the rate was 12.4% in the long-acting group (P = 0.03). The mean number of T2DM-related outpatient visits was 0.98 and 1.23 for the premixed and long-acting groups, respectively (P = 0.07). During the follow-up period, the per-day insulin dose averaged 31.7 and 15.3 international units (IU) for the premixed and long-acting groups, respectively. Compared with the patients on premixed insulin, the mean per-day cost for patients on long-acting insulin was 37.3% higher [15.3 vs 11.2 Chinese yuan (RMB); mean difference (MD) (95% CI): 4.2 (3.2, 5.1)] for the overall anti-diabetes medication, 81.3% higher [3.3 vs 1.8 RMB; MD (95% CI): 1.5 (0.8, 2.2)] for OAD, and 28.6% higher [12.0 vs 9.3 RMB; MD (95% CI): 2.7 (2.1, 3.3)] for insulin. The results were consistent after adjusting for the PS.

Conclusion

Among Chinese T2DM insulin-naïve patients, those who initiated premixed insulin had a lower per-day antidiabetic medication cost than those who initiated long-acting insulin.

Funding

Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pan C, Yang W, Jia W, et al. Management of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, 1998–2006: the Diabcare-China surveys. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:39–45.CrossRefPubMed Pan C, Yang W, Jia W, et al. Management of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, 1998–2006: the Diabcare-China surveys. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:39–45.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yang J, Li J. Premixed or basal insulin: the insulin initiation consideration in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;29:5b-1. Yang J, Li J. Premixed or basal insulin: the insulin initiation consideration in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;29:5b-1.
5.
go back to reference Palmer JL, Beaudet A, White J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Adv Ther. 2010;27:814–27.CrossRefPubMed Palmer JL, Beaudet A, White J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. Adv Ther. 2010;27:814–27.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chang BC. The use of premix insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from pharmacoeconomics perspective [in Chinese]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;2:126–8. Chang BC. The use of premix insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from pharmacoeconomics perspective [in Chinese]. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;2:126–8.
7.
go back to reference Weng J, Ji L, Jia W, et al. Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:442–58. Weng J, Ji L, Jia W, et al. Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:442–58.
8.
go back to reference Liebl A, Prager R, Binz K, et al. Comparison of insulin analogue regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the PREFER study: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;1:45–52. Liebl A, Prager R, Binz K, et al. Comparison of insulin analogue regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the PREFER study: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;1:45–52.
9.
go back to reference Fonseca V, Davidson J, Home P, et al. Starting insulin therapy with basal insulin analog or premix insulin analog in T2DM: a pooled analysis of treat-to-target trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1621–8.CrossRefPubMed Fonseca V, Davidson J, Home P, et al. Starting insulin therapy with basal insulin analog or premix insulin analog in T2DM: a pooled analysis of treat-to-target trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1621–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barber J, Thompson S. Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:197–204.CrossRefPubMed Barber J, Thompson S. Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9:197–204.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goetzl L, Wilkins I. Glyburide compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost analysis. J Perinatol. 2002;22:403–6.CrossRefPubMed Goetzl L, Wilkins I. Glyburide compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost analysis. J Perinatol. 2002;22:403–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Levy P. Insulin analogs or premixed insulin analogs in combination with oral agents for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Med Gen Med. 2007;9:12. Levy P. Insulin analogs or premixed insulin analogs in combination with oral agents for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Med Gen Med. 2007;9:12.
13.
go back to reference Qayyum R, Bolen S, Maruthur N, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:549–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qayyum R, Bolen S, Maruthur N, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:549–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Garrison LP Jr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, et al. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. Value Health. 2007;10:326–35. Garrison LP Jr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, et al. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. Value Health. 2007;10:326–35.
15.
go back to reference Higgins AM, Harris AH. Health economic methods: cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit evaluations. Crit Care Clin. 2012;1:11–24.CrossRef Higgins AM, Harris AH. Health economic methods: cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit evaluations. Crit Care Clin. 2012;1:11–24.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Real-World Anti-Diabetes Medication Cost Comparison Between Premixed Insulin Analogs and Long-Acting Insulin Analogs in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Database Analysis
Authors
Yue Gao
Ke Wang
Yun Chen
Li Shen
Jianing Hou
Jianwei Xuan
Bao Liu
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0382-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Diabetes Therapy 2/2018 Go to the issue