Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 1/2010

Open Access 01-08-2010 | Original Research

A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK

Authors: C. L. Morgan, A. Griffin, G. H. Chamberlain, A. Turkiendorf, P. McEwan, L. M. Evans, D. R. Owens

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

To determine the impact of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) strip use in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK.

Methods

The study period was April 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005. Data from primary care was extracted from The Health Improvement Network database. Patients identified with diabetes and matching the inclusion criteria were defined as new users of SMBG, prevalent users, or non-users. Patients were also defined as treated with insulin, with oral agents (OA), or not pharmacologically treated. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline and after 12 months was compared.

Results

2559 patients met the inclusion criteria. For new users, HbA1c fell by 0.59% (P=0.399) for those treated with insulin, 1.52% (P<0.001) for those treated with OA, and 0.51% (P<0.001) for no treatment. In prevalent users, changes were 0.31% (P<0.001), 0.34% (P<0.001), and 0.09% (P=0.456), respectively. In non-users, changes were 0.28% (P=0.618), 0.42% (P<0.001), and an increase of 0.05% (P=0.043), respectively. A significant decrease in mean HbA1c was associated with increasing strip use in OA patients newly initiated on strips.

Conclusion

This observational study showed a significant decrease in HbA1c for new users of SMBG treated either non-pharmacologically or with OA, and for prevalent users treated with insulin or OA. Reduced HbA1c with increasing strip use was observed but was only significant for OA-treated new users. This suggests that SMBG use has a role in the treatment of non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–853.CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–853.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(suppl. 1):S4–S36.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(suppl. 1):S4–S36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Davidson MB. Counterpoint: self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients not receiving insulin: a waste of money Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1531–1533.PubMedCrossRef Davidson MB. Counterpoint: self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients not receiving insulin: a waste of money Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1531–1533.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Klonoff DC, Bergenstal R, Blonde L, et al. Consensus report of the Coalition for Clinical Research—self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:1030–1053.PubMed Klonoff DC, Bergenstal R, Blonde L, et al. Consensus report of the Coalition for Clinical Research—self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:1030–1053.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Klonoff DC. New evidence demonstrates that self-monitoring of blood glucose does not improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes—when this oractice is not applied properly. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:342–348.PubMed Klonoff DC. New evidence demonstrates that self-monitoring of blood glucose does not improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes—when this oractice is not applied properly. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:342–348.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Welschen LMC, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1510–1517.PubMedCrossRef Welschen LMC, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1510–1517.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kempf K, Neukirchen W, Martin S, Kolb H. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: a new look at published trials. Diabetologia. 2008;51:686–688.PubMedCrossRef Kempf K, Neukirchen W, Martin S, Kolb H. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: a new look at published trials. Diabetologia. 2008;51:686–688.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Davis WA, Bruce DG, Davis TME. Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1764–7170.PubMedCrossRef Davis WA, Bruce DG, Davis TME. Is self-monitoring of blood glucose appropriate for all type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1764–7170.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Palmer AJ, Dinneen S, Gavin JR III, Gray A, Herman WH, Karter AJ. Cost-utility analysis in a UK setting of self-monitoring blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:861–872.PubMedCrossRef Palmer AJ, Dinneen S, Gavin JR III, Gray A, Herman WH, Karter AJ. Cost-utility analysis in a UK setting of self-monitoring blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:861–872.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gallichan M. Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice. BMJ. 1997;314:964–967.PubMed Gallichan M. Self monitoring of glucose by people with diabetes: evidence based practice. BMJ. 1997;314:964–967.PubMed
12.
go back to reference O’Kane MJ, Bunting B, Copeland M, Coates VE. Efficacy of self monitoring blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336:1174–1177.PubMedCrossRef O’Kane MJ, Bunting B, Copeland M, Coates VE. Efficacy of self monitoring blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336:1174–1177.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HM, et al. Longitudinal study of new and prevalent use of self monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1756–1763.CrossRef Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HM, et al. Longitudinal study of new and prevalent use of self monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1756–1763.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Maguire A, Blak B, Thompson M. The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;18:76–83.CrossRef Maguire A, Blak B, Thompson M. The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;18:76–83.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Farmer A, Wade A, Goyder E, et al. Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial. BMJ. 2007;335:132.PubMedCrossRef Farmer A, Wade A, Goyder E, et al. Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial. BMJ. 2007;335:132.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Guerci B, Drouin P, Grangé V, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29:587–594.PubMedCrossRef Guerci B, Drouin P, Grangé V, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29:587–594.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
Authors
C. L. Morgan
A. Griffin
G. H. Chamberlain
A. Turkiendorf
P. McEwan
L. M. Evans
D. R. Owens
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer Healthcare Communications
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0001-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Diabetes Therapy 1/2010 Go to the issue

Letter from the Editor

Letter from the Editor

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.