Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Research Article

Associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

Authors: Guo-qing Wang, Lei Bao, Xi-xia Zhao, Jun Zhang, Ke-jun Nan

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Genetic polymorphisms in the Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) gene were proposed to be associated with susceptibility to cervical cancer, but previous studies reported controversial findings. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. We carried out a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases for studies on the associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. The associations were assessed by odds ratio (OR) together with its 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven individual studies with a total of 6,919 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no association between Fas 1377G > A polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer (A vs. G: OR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.88–1.12, P = 0.91; AA vs. GG: OR = 1.00, 95 % CI 0.76–1.32, P = 0.99; AA/GA vs. GG: OR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.81–1.12, P = 0.54; AA vs. GG/GA: OR = 1.11, 95 % CI 0.85–1.43, P = 0.45). In addition, there was also no association between FasL 844 T > C polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer (C vs. T: OR = 1.12, 95 % CI 0.91–1.36, P = 0.28; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.17, 95 % CI 0.90–1.51, P = 0.24; CC/TC vs. TT: OR = 1.13, 95 % CI 0.92–1.39, P = 0.24; CC vs. TT/TC: OR = 1.11, 95 % CI 0.83–1.50, P = 0.47). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, there were also no associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer in Asians and Africans. In conclusion, Fas 1377G > A polymorphism and FasL 844 T > C polymorphism are both not associated with susceptibility to cervical cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378:1461–84.CrossRefPubMed Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, et al. Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378:1461–84.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890–907.CrossRefPubMed Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370:890–907.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:663–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:663–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference de Freitas AC, Gurgel AP, Chagas BS, Coimbra EC. do Amaral CM. Susceptibility to cervical cancer: an overview. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:304–11.CrossRefPubMed de Freitas AC, Gurgel AP, Chagas BS, Coimbra EC. do Amaral CM. Susceptibility to cervical cancer: an overview. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:304–11.CrossRefPubMed
7.
9.
go back to reference Scholz M, Cinatl J. Fas/FasL interaction: a novel immune therapy approach with immobilized biologicals. Med Res Rev. 2005;25:331–42.CrossRefPubMed Scholz M, Cinatl J. Fas/FasL interaction: a novel immune therapy approach with immobilized biologicals. Med Res Rev. 2005;25:331–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ferguson TA, Griffith TS. A vision of cell death: Fas ligand and immune privilege 10 years later. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:228–38.CrossRefPubMed Ferguson TA, Griffith TS. A vision of cell death: Fas ligand and immune privilege 10 years later. Immunol Rev. 2006;213:228–38.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lai HC, Lin WY, Lin YW, Chang CC, Yu MH, Chen CC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of FAS and FASL (CD95/CD95L) genes in cervical carcinogenesis: an analysis of haplotype and gene-gene interaction. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:113–8.CrossRefPubMed Lai HC, Lin WY, Lin YW, Chang CC, Yu MH, Chen CC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of FAS and FASL (CD95/CD95L) genes in cervical carcinogenesis: an analysis of haplotype and gene-gene interaction. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:113–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ivansson EL, Gustavsson IM, Magnusson JJ, Steiner LL, Magnusson PK, Erlich HA, et al. Variants of chemokine receptor 2 and interleukin 4 receptor, but not interleukin 10 or Fas ligand, increase risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:2451–7.CrossRefPubMed Ivansson EL, Gustavsson IM, Magnusson JJ, Steiner LL, Magnusson PK, Erlich HA, et al. Variants of chemokine receptor 2 and interleukin 4 receptor, but not interleukin 10 or Fas ligand, increase risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:2451–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kang S, Dong SM, Seo SS, Kim JW, Park SY. FAS −1377 G/A polymorphism and the risk of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;180:1–5.CrossRefPubMed Kang S, Dong SM, Seo SS, Kim JW, Park SY. FAS −1377 G/A polymorphism and the risk of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;180:1–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chatterjee K, Engelmark M, Gyllensten U, Dandara C, van der Merwe L, Galal U, et al. Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among black and mixed-ancestry South Africans. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chatterjee K, Engelmark M, Gyllensten U, Dandara C, van der Merwe L, Galal U, et al. Fas and FasL gene polymorphisms are not associated with cervical cancer but differ among black and mixed-ancestry South Africans. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Li H, Guo HY, Sun T, Zhou YF, Lin DX, Zhang WH, et al. Association between Fas/Fas L genes promoter polymorphisms and pathogenic risk of cervical cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009;31:38–41.PubMed Li H, Guo HY, Sun T, Zhou YF, Lin DX, Zhang WH, et al. Association between Fas/Fas L genes promoter polymorphisms and pathogenic risk of cervical cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009;31:38–41.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.CrossRef Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Habbous S, Pang V, Eng L, Xu W, Kurtz G, Liu FF, et al. p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism, HPV status and initiation, progression, and development of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6407–15.CrossRefPubMed Habbous S, Pang V, Eng L, Xu W, Kurtz G, Liu FF, et al. p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism, HPV status and initiation, progression, and development of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6407–15.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yu L, Chang K, Han J, Deng S, Chen M. Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu L, Chang K, Han J, Deng S, Chen M. Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Zhang HL, Zhang YJ. A systemic assessment of the association between tumor necrosis factor alpha 308 G/A polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1659–65.CrossRefPubMed Zhang HL, Zhang YJ. A systemic assessment of the association between tumor necrosis factor alpha 308 G/A polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1659–65.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liu Y, Wen QJ, Yin Y, Lu XT, Pu SH, Tian HP, et al. FASLG polymorphism is associated with cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2574–8.CrossRefPubMed Liu Y, Wen QJ, Yin Y, Lu XT, Pu SH, Tian HP, et al. FASLG polymorphism is associated with cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2574–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Qiu L, Wang M, Tong N, Li J. The FAS ligand promoter polymorphism, rs763110 (−844C > T), contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case–control studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1294–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Z, Qiu L, Wang M, Tong N, Li J. The FAS ligand promoter polymorphism, rs763110 (−844C > T), contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case–control studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1294–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wu Z, Wang H, Chu X, Chen J, Fang S. Association between FAS-1377 G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2147–52.CrossRefPubMed Wu Z, Wang H, Chu X, Chen J, Fang S. Association between FAS-1377 G/A polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2147–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Authors
Guo-qing Wang
Lei Bao
Xi-xia Zhao
Jun Zhang
Ke-jun Nan
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1537-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Tumor Biology 5/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine