Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Research Article

Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Authors: Michael Haas, Rüdiger P. Laubender, Petra Stieber, Stefan Holdenrieder, Christiane J. Bruns, Ralf Wilkowski, Ulrich Mansmann, Volker Heinemann, Stefan Boeck

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define prognostic serum biomarkers that could serve as surrogate survival endpoints during second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. This retrospective single-center study included patients treated with second-line therapy for advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer. A pretreatment value and at least one serial measurement during the first two cycles of second-line chemotherapy for CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH had to be available in order to evaluate the prognostic role of kinetics on overall survival. A cutoff of a >20% increase from baseline during treatment was defined in order to form groups with suspected different outcomes. The effect of serial biomarker changes on survival was modeled by Cox proportional hazards regression in univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, 70 patients treated with second-line therapy for advanced disease were included; 94% had distant metastases at treatment initiation. Median time to progression was 2.7 months and median survival 5.4 months. Univariate analysis found that an increase of >20% during treatment was significantly associated with a worse overall survival for CA 19-9 (HR 2.00, p = 0.018), CEA (HR 2.38, p = 0.004), and CRP (HR 3.06, p < 0.001). These associations remained significant within multivariate analysis for CEA (HR 2.86, p = 0.001) and CRP (HR 3.20, p = 0.001). Serum biomarker kinetics might serve as useful prognostic tools during second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13.PubMed Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2403–13.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Heinemann V. Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a comparative analysis of randomized trials. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:9–16.PubMed Heinemann V. Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a comparative analysis of randomized trials. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:9–16.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960–6.CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1960–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5513–18.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5513–18.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Boeck S, Heinemann V. The role of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Future Oncol. 2008;4:41–50.CrossRefPubMed Boeck S, Heinemann V. The role of second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Future Oncol. 2008;4:41–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nakachi K, Furuse J, Ishii H, Suzuki E, Yoshino M. Prognostic factors in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:114–20.CrossRefPubMed Nakachi K, Furuse J, Ishii H, Suzuki E, Yoshino M. Prognostic factors in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:114–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pelzer U, Kubica K, Stieler J, et al. A randomized trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. Final results from the CONKO 003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(Suppl):abstr.4508. Pelzer U, Kubica K, Stieler J, et al. A randomized trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. Final results from the CONKO 003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(Suppl):abstr.4508.
9.
go back to reference Koprowski H, Steplewski Z, Mitchell K, et al. Colorectal carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies. Somat Cell Genet. 1979;5:957–71.CrossRefPubMed Koprowski H, Steplewski Z, Mitchell K, et al. Colorectal carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies. Somat Cell Genet. 1979;5:957–71.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Berger AC, Garcia M, Hoffman JP, et al. Postresection CA 19-9 predicts overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: a prospective validation by RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5918–22.CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Garcia M, Hoffman JP, et al. Postresection CA 19-9 predicts overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: a prospective validation by RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5918–22.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stemmler J, Stieber P, Szymala AM, et al. Are serial CA 19-9 kinetics helpful in predicting survival in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin? Onkologie. 2003;26:462–7.CrossRefPubMed Stemmler J, Stieber P, Szymala AM, et al. Are serial CA 19-9 kinetics helpful in predicting survival in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin? Onkologie. 2003;26:462–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, et al. Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:195–9.CrossRefPubMed Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, et al. Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:195–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Reni M, Cereda S, Balzano G, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 change during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009;115:2630–9.CrossRefPubMed Reni M, Cereda S, Balzano G, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 change during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009;115:2630–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P, et al. CA 19-9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:132–8.CrossRefPubMed Hess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P, et al. CA 19-9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:132–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, Lau WY, Glazer G. Elevated tumour marker CA19-9: clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:474–9.CrossRefPubMed Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, Lau WY, Glazer G. Elevated tumour marker CA19-9: clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:474–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Maréchal R, Demols A, Gay F, et al. Prognostic factors and prognostic index for chemonaïve and gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2007;73:41–51.CrossRefPubMed Maréchal R, Demols A, Gay F, et al. Prognostic factors and prognostic index for chemonaïve and gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2007;73:41–51.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sawaki A, Kanemitsu Y, Mizuno N, et al. Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1292–7.CrossRefPubMed Sawaki A, Kanemitsu Y, Mizuno N, et al. Practical prognostic index for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1292–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference van Cutsem E, Vervenne WL, Bennouna J, et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2231–7.CrossRefPubMed van Cutsem E, Vervenne WL, Bennouna J, et al. Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2231–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brambs HJ, Claussen CD. Pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma. Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography. Endoscopy. 1993;25:58–68.CrossRefPubMed Brambs HJ, Claussen CD. Pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma. Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography. Endoscopy. 1993;25:58–68.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reni M, Berardi R, Mambrini A, et al. A multi-centre retrospective review of second-line therapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:673–8.CrossRefPubMed Reni M, Berardi R, Mambrini A, et al. A multi-centre retrospective review of second-line therapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:673–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tanaka T, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, et al. Prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:755–61.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka T, Ikeda M, Okusaka T, et al. Prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line therapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:755–61.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tas F, Aykan F, Alici S, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic carcinoma: serum LDH levels predict survival in metastatic disease. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001;24:547–50.CrossRefPubMed Tas F, Aykan F, Alici S, et al. Prognostic factors in pancreatic carcinoma: serum LDH levels predict survival in metastatic disease. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001;24:547–50.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kulke MH, Blaszkowsky LS, Ryan DP, et al. Capecitabine plus erlotinib in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4787–92.CrossRefPubMed Kulke MH, Blaszkowsky LS, Ryan DP, et al. Capecitabine plus erlotinib in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4787–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Boeck S, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ, et al. Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2007;73:221–7.CrossRefPubMed Boeck S, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ, et al. Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2007;73:221–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Firpo MA, Gay DZ, Granger SR, et al. Improved diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in a panel screen. World J Surg. 2009;33:716–22.CrossRefPubMed Firpo MA, Gay DZ, Granger SR, et al. Improved diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in a panel screen. World J Surg. 2009;33:716–22.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Buyse M, Piedbois P. On the relationship between response to treatment and survival time. Stat Med. 1996;15:2797–812.CrossRefPubMed Buyse M, Piedbois P. On the relationship between response to treatment and survival time. Stat Med. 1996;15:2797–812.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:710–19.PubMed Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:710–19.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Nakai Y, Kawabe T, Isayama H, et al. CA 19-9 response as an early indicator of the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2008;75:120–6.CrossRefPubMed Nakai Y, Kawabe T, Isayama H, et al. CA 19-9 response as an early indicator of the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2008;75:120–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic relevance of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, and LDH kinetics in patients treated with palliative second-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer
Authors
Michael Haas
Rüdiger P. Laubender
Petra Stieber
Stefan Holdenrieder
Christiane J. Bruns
Ralf Wilkowski
Ulrich Mansmann
Volker Heinemann
Stefan Boeck
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-010-0044-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Tumor Biology 4/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine