Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Pictorial Review

Early cross-sectional imaging following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a primer for radiologists

Authors: Massimo Tonolini, Anna Maria Ierardi, Francesca Patella, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Performed on either an elective or urgent basis, cholecystectomy currently represents the most common abdominal operation due to the widespread use of laparoscopy and the progressively expanded indications. Compared to traditional open surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimised the duration of hospitalisation and perioperative mortality. Albeit generally considered safe, cholecystectomy may result in adverse outcomes with non-negligible morbidity. Furthermore, the incidence of worrisome haemorrhages and biliary complications has not been influenced by the technique shift. Due to the growing medico-legal concerns and the vast number of cholecystectomies, radiologists are increasingly requested to investigate recently operated patients. Aiming to increase familiarity with post-cholecystectomy cross-sectional imaging, this paper provides a brief overview of indications and surgical techniques and illustrates the expected early postoperative imaging findings. Afterwards, most iatrogenic complications following open, converted, laparoscopic and laparo-endoscopic rendezvous cholecystectomy are reviewed with examples, including infections, haematoma and active bleeding, residual choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, biliary obstruction and leakage. Multidetector computed tomography (CT) represents the “workhorse” modality to rapidly investigate the postoperative abdomen in order to provide a reliable basis for an appropriate choice between conservative, interventional or surgical treatment. Emphasis is placed on the role of early magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and additional gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRCP to provide a non-invasive anatomic and functional assessment of the operated biliary tract.

Teaching Points

Having minimised perioperative mortality and hospital stay, laparoscopy has now become the first-line approach to performing cholecystectomy, even in patients with acute cholecystitis.
Laparoscopic, laparo-endoscopic rendezvous, converted and open cholecystectomy remain associated with non-negligible morbidity, including surgical site infections, haemorrhage, residual lithiasis, pancreatitis, biliary obstruction and leakage.
Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) is increasingly requested early after cholecystectomy and represents the “workhorse” modality that rapidly provides a comprehensive assessment of the operated biliary tract and abdomen.
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the best modality to provide anatomic visualisation of the operated biliary tract and is indicated when biliary complications are suspected.
Additional gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRCP non-invasively provides functional biliary assessment, in order to confirm and visualise bile leakage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stinton LM, Shaffer EA (2012) Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 6:172–187CrossRef Stinton LM, Shaffer EA (2012) Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver 6:172–187CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Agabiti N, Stafoggia M, Davoli M, Fusco D, Barone AP, Perucci CA (2013) Thirty-day complications after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a population-based cohort study in Italy. BMJ Open 3. pii: e001943 Agabiti N, Stafoggia M, Davoli M, Fusco D, Barone AP, Perucci CA (2013) Thirty-day complications after laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a population-based cohort study in Italy. BMJ Open 3. pii: e001943
3.
go back to reference Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP et al (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211:73–80CrossRef Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP et al (2010) Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 211:73–80CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Murphy MM, Shah SA, Simons JP et al (2009) Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1929–1936CrossRef Murphy MM, Shah SA, Simons JP et al (2009) Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1929–1936CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M et al (2015) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 18:196–204CrossRef Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M et al (2015) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 18:196–204CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Halilovic H, Hasukic S, Matovic E, Imamovic G (2011) Rate of complications and conversions after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Med Arh 65:336–338 Halilovic H, Hasukic S, Matovic E, Imamovic G (2011) Rate of complications and conversions after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Med Arh 65:336–338
7.
go back to reference Yi F, Jin WS, Xiang DB, Sun GY, Huaguo D (2012) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its prevention: a review and experience of 400 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 59:47–50 Yi F, Jin WS, Xiang DB, Sun GY, Huaguo D (2012) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its prevention: a review and experience of 400 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 59:47–50
8.
go back to reference Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251:682–685CrossRef Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) 15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Ann Surg 251:682–685CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Scurr JR, Brigstocke JR, Shields DA, Scurr JH (2010) Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:286–291 Scurr JR, Brigstocke JR, Shields DA, Scurr JH (2010) Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:286–291
10.
go back to reference Thurley PD, Dhingsa R (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: postoperative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:794–801CrossRef Thurley PD, Dhingsa R (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: postoperative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:794–801CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lohan D, Walsh S, McLoughlin R, Murphy J (2005) Imaging of the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Radiol 15:904–912 Lohan D, Walsh S, McLoughlin R, Murphy J (2005) Imaging of the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Radiol 15:904–912
12.
go back to reference Kim JY, Kim KW, Ahn CS et al (2008) Spectrum of biliary and nonbiliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: radiologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:783–789CrossRef Kim JY, Kim KW, Ahn CS et al (2008) Spectrum of biliary and nonbiliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: radiologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:783–789CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choi JY, Kim MJ, Park MS et al (2006) Imaging findings of biliary and nonbiliary complications following laparoscopic surgery. Eur Radiol 16:1906–1914CrossRef Choi JY, Kim MJ, Park MS et al (2006) Imaging findings of biliary and nonbiliary complications following laparoscopic surgery. Eur Radiol 16:1906–1914CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Melamud K, LeBedis CA, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2014) Biliary imaging: multimodality approach to imaging of biliary injuries and their complications. Radiographics 34:613–623 Melamud K, LeBedis CA, Anderson SW, Soto JA (2014) Biliary imaging: multimodality approach to imaging of biliary injuries and their complications. Radiographics 34:613–623
15.
go back to reference Haribhakti SP, Mistry JH (2015) Techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: nomenclature and selection. J Minim Access Surg 11:113–118CrossRef Haribhakti SP, Mistry JH (2015) Techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: nomenclature and selection. J Minim Access Surg 11:113–118CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD006004 Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD006004
17.
go back to reference Sathesh-Kumar T, Saklani AP, Vinayagam R, Blackett RL (2004) Spilled gall stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of the literature. Postgrad Med J 80:77–79 Sathesh-Kumar T, Saklani AP, Vinayagam R, Blackett RL (2004) Spilled gall stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of the literature. Postgrad Med J 80:77–79
18.
go back to reference Schäfer M, Suter C, Klaiber C, Wehrli H, Frei E, Krähenbühl L (1998) Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A relevant problem? A retrospective analysis of 10,174 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 12:305–309 Schäfer M, Suter C, Klaiber C, Wehrli H, Frei E, Krähenbühl L (1998) Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A relevant problem? A retrospective analysis of 10,174 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 12:305–309
19.
go back to reference Demirbas BT, Gulluoglu BM, Aktan AO (2015) Retained abdominal gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:97–99CrossRef Demirbas BT, Gulluoglu BM, Aktan AO (2015) Retained abdominal gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25:97–99CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F et al (2016) 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:25 Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F et al (2016) 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:25
21.
go back to reference Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:55–72CrossRef Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T et al (2018) Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:55–72CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Borzellino G, Rodella L, Saladino E et al (2010) Treatment for retained [corrected] common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the rendezvous technique. Arch Surg 145:1145–1149CrossRef Borzellino G, Rodella L, Saladino E et al (2010) Treatment for retained [corrected] common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the rendezvous technique. Arch Surg 145:1145–1149CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jara G, Rosciano J, Barrios W et al (2017) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a surgical alternative to reduce complications in complex cases. Cir Esp 95:465–470CrossRef Jara G, Rosciano J, Barrios W et al (2017) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a surgical alternative to reduce complications in complex cases. Cir Esp 95:465–470CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I et al (2008) Advantages of multidisciplinary management of bile duct injuries occurring during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 195:763–769CrossRef Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I et al (2008) Advantages of multidisciplinary management of bile duct injuries occurring during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 195:763–769CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hindman NM, Kang S, Parikh MS (2014) Common postoperative findings unique to laparoscopic surgery. Radiographics 34:119–138CrossRef Hindman NM, Kang S, Parikh MS (2014) Common postoperative findings unique to laparoscopic surgery. Radiographics 34:119–138CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Han NY, Sung DJ, Park BJ, Kim MJ, Cho SB, Kim YH (2014) Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging 39:398–410 Han NY, Sung DJ, Park BJ, Kim MJ, Cho SB, Kim YH (2014) Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging 39:398–410
27.
go back to reference Hoeffel C, Azizi L, Lewin M et al (2006) Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 26:1603–1620CrossRef Hoeffel C, Azizi L, Lewin M et al (2006) Normal and pathologic features of the postoperative biliary tract at 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging. Radiographics 26:1603–1620CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ragozzino A, De Ritis R, Mosca A, Iaccarino V, Imbriaco M (2004) Value of MR cholangiography in patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1567–1572 Ragozzino A, De Ritis R, Mosca A, Iaccarino V, Imbriaco M (2004) Value of MR cholangiography in patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury after cholecystectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1567–1572
29.
go back to reference Ward J, Sheridan MB, Guthrie JA et al (2004) Bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery: assessment with MR cholangiography. Radiology 231:101–108CrossRef Ward J, Sheridan MB, Guthrie JA et al (2004) Bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery: assessment with MR cholangiography. Radiology 231:101–108CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW et al (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724CrossRef Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW et al (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748 Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748
32.
go back to reference Alegre Castellanos A, Molina Granados JF, Escribano Fernandez J, Gallardo Muñoz I, Triviño Tarradas Fde A (2012) Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37:795–802 Alegre Castellanos A, Molina Granados JF, Escribano Fernandez J, Gallardo Muñoz I, Triviño Tarradas Fde A (2012) Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37:795–802
33.
go back to reference Nayak L, Menias CO, Gayer G (2013) Dropped gallstones: spectrum of imaging findings, complications and diagnostic pitfalls. Br J Radiol 86:20120588CrossRef Nayak L, Menias CO, Gayer G (2013) Dropped gallstones: spectrum of imaging findings, complications and diagnostic pitfalls. Br J Radiol 86:20120588CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Islim F, Salik AE, Bayramoglu S, Guven K, Alis H, Turhan AN (2014) Non-invasive detection of infection in acute pancreatic and acute necrotic collections with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings. Abdom Imaging 39:472–481 Islim F, Salik AE, Bayramoglu S, Guven K, Alis H, Turhan AN (2014) Non-invasive detection of infection in acute pancreatic and acute necrotic collections with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings. Abdom Imaging 39:472–481
35.
go back to reference Kalovidouris A, Kehagias D, Moulopoulos L, Gouliamos A, Pentea S, Vlahos L (1999) Abdominal retained surgical sponges: CT appearance. Eur Radiol 9:1407–1410 Kalovidouris A, Kehagias D, Moulopoulos L, Gouliamos A, Pentea S, Vlahos L (1999) Abdominal retained surgical sponges: CT appearance. Eur Radiol 9:1407–1410
36.
go back to reference Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Okumura A et al (2007) MR imaging of acute biliary disorders. Radiographics 27:477–495CrossRef Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Okumura A et al (2007) MR imaging of acute biliary disorders. Radiographics 27:477–495CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Catalano OA, Sahani DV, Forcione DG et al (2009) Biliary infections: spectrum of imaging findings and management. Radiographics 29:2059–2080CrossRef Catalano OA, Sahani DV, Forcione DG et al (2009) Biliary infections: spectrum of imaging findings and management. Radiographics 29:2059–2080CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Tonolini M, Pagani A, Bianco R (2015) Cross-sectional imaging of common and unusual complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Insights Imaging 6:323–338CrossRef Tonolini M, Pagani A, Bianco R (2015) Cross-sectional imaging of common and unusual complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Insights Imaging 6:323–338CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU (2001) Using MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1347–1352 Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU (2001) Using MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1347–1352
40.
go back to reference Krokidis M, Orgera G, Rossi M, Matteoli M, Hatzidakis A (2013) Interventional radiology in the management of benign biliary stenoses, biliary leaks and fistulas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 4:77–84 Krokidis M, Orgera G, Rossi M, Matteoli M, Hatzidakis A (2013) Interventional radiology in the management of benign biliary stenoses, biliary leaks and fistulas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 4:77–84
41.
go back to reference Hii MW, Gyorki DE, Sakata K, Cade RJ, Banting SW (2011) Endoscopic management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula. HPB (Oxford) 13:699–705 Hii MW, Gyorki DE, Sakata K, Cade RJ, Banting SW (2011) Endoscopic management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula. HPB (Oxford) 13:699–705
42.
go back to reference Sultan AM, Elnakeeb AM, Elshobary MM et al (2015) Management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula according to type of cholecystectomy. Endosc Int Open 3:E91–E98PubMed Sultan AM, Elnakeeb AM, Elshobary MM et al (2015) Management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula according to type of cholecystectomy. Endosc Int Open 3:E91–E98PubMed
Metadata
Title
Early cross-sectional imaging following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a primer for radiologists
Authors
Massimo Tonolini
Anna Maria Ierardi
Francesca Patella
Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 6/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0663-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Insights into Imaging 6/2018 Go to the issue