Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2015

Open Access 01-02-2015 | Opinion

Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel

Authors: Jan M. L. Bosmans, Emanuele Neri, Osman Ratib, Charles E. Kahn Jr.

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Analysis of a serum sample, and whole blood on citrate and EDTA. We compare the results to those of December 20th. We observe a slight rise in blood glucose level, but the value is still within normal limits. Erythrocytes sedimentate at a rather fair rate of 25 millimetres per hour, which can be considered just mildly abnormal, taking into account the patient’s gender and age. We notice serum creatinine is 140 micromoles per litre, which corresponds, according to Cockroft-Gault, to a creatinine clearance of 67 millilitres per minute. The other chemical constituents and haematological evaluations are unremarkable, except for a rise in the number of neutrophils, which has tripled in comparison with the last examination.
Impression
Biochemically, we see little evolution in this slightly overweight, middle-aged patient with a history of arterial hypertension, but there is a possible suspicion of an acute infection. These results need to be correlated to the clinical presentation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM (2009) Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 72:354–358CrossRefPubMed Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM (2009) Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 72:354–358CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195CrossRefPubMed Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dogan N, Varlibas ZN, Erpolat OP (2010) Radiological report: expectations of clinicians. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:179–185PubMed Dogan N, Varlibas ZN, Erpolat OP (2010) Radiological report: expectations of clinicians. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:179–185PubMed
5.
go back to reference Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598CrossRefPubMed Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians’ preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64:386–394CrossRefPubMed Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians’ preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64:386–394CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Langlotz CP (2002) Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 224:5–7CrossRefPubMed Langlotz CP (2002) Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 224:5–7CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Cummings JE, Dent JM, Hodgson JM, Hoffmann U et al (2009) ACCF/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Health Policy Statement on Structured Reporting in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:76–90CrossRefPubMed Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Cummings JE, Dent JM, Hodgson JM, Hoffmann U et al (2009) ACCF/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Health Policy Statement on Structured Reporting in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:76–90CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed, Bangor Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed, Bangor
11.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Peremans L, Menni M, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM (2012) Structured reporting: if, why, when, how—and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countries. Insights Imaging 3:295–302CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Bosmans JM, Peremans L, Menni M, De Schepper AM, Duyck PO, Parizel PM (2012) Structured reporting: if, why, when, how—and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countries. Insights Imaging 3:295–302CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253:74–80CrossRefPubMed Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2009) Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253:74–80CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kahn CE Jr, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES et al (2009) Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252:852–856CrossRefPubMed Kahn CE Jr, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES et al (2009) Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252:852–856CrossRefPubMed
17.
20.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR communication guidelines for radiologists. Insights Imaging 4:143–146CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR communication guidelines for radiologists. Insights Imaging 4:143–146CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Durack JC (2014) The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:734–738CrossRefPubMed Durack JC (2014) The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:734–738CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Structured reporting: a fusion reactor hungry for fuel
Authors
Jan M. L. Bosmans
Emanuele Neri
Osman Ratib
Charles E. Kahn Jr.
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0368-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Insights into Imaging 1/2015 Go to the issue