Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2006

01-12-2006

Benefits of the DICOM Structured Report

Author: Rita Noumeir

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Recently, the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) standard introduced rules for the encoding, transmission, and storage of the imaging diagnostic report. This medical document can be stored and communicated with the images in picture archiving and communication system (PACS). It is a structured document that contains text with links to other data such as images, waveforms, and spatial or temporal coordinates. Its structure, along with its wide use of coded information, enables the semantic understanding of the data that is essential for the Electronic Healthcare Record deployment. In this article, we present DICOM Structured Report (SR) and discuss its benefits. We show how SR enables efficient radiology workflow, improves patient care, optimizes reimbursement, and enhances the radiology ergonomic working conditions. As structured input significantly alters the interpretation process, understanding all its benefits is necessary to support the change.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ratib, O, Swiernik, M, McCoy, JM 2003From PACS to integrated EMRComput Med Imaging Graph27207215March/JuneCrossRefPubMed Ratib, O, Swiernik, M, McCoy, JM 2003From PACS to integrated EMRComput Med Imaging Graph27207215March/JuneCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pommerening, k, Reng, M 2004Secondary use of the electronic health record via pseudonymisationBos, LLaxminarayan, SMarsh, A eds. Medical Care Compunetics 1IOS PressAmsterdam441446 Pommerening, k, Reng, M 2004Secondary use of the electronic health record via pseudonymisationBos, LLaxminarayan, SMarsh, A eds. Medical Care Compunetics 1IOS PressAmsterdam441446
3.
go back to reference Noumeir R: Reporting workflow modeling, progress in biomedical optics and imaging. Medical Imaging 2004-PACS and Imaging Informatics 5(25):8–15, 2004 Noumeir R: Reporting workflow modeling, progress in biomedical optics and imaging. Medical Imaging 2004-PACS and Imaging Informatics 5(25):8–15, 2004
4.
go back to reference Noumeir, R 2003DICOM structured report document type definitionIEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed7318328DecemberCrossRefPubMed Noumeir, R 2003DICOM structured report document type definitionIEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed7318328DecemberCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Clunie, DA 2001DICOM structured reporting: An object model as an implementation boundaryProc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng4323207215 Clunie, DA 2001DICOM structured reporting: An object model as an implementation boundaryProc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng4323207215
6.
go back to reference Noumeir, R 2002Multimedia medical diagnostic documentProc IEEE Int Conf Multimedia Expo2325328 Noumeir, R 2002Multimedia medical diagnostic documentProc IEEE Int Conf Multimedia Expo2325328
7.
go back to reference Clunie DA: DICOM Structured Reporting. PixelMed Publishing, 2002 Clunie DA: DICOM Structured Reporting. PixelMed Publishing, 2002
8.
go back to reference Hripcsak, G, Austin, JHM, Philip, O, Alderson, PO, Friedman, C 2002Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reportsRadiology224157163PubMed Hripcsak, G, Austin, JHM, Philip, O, Alderson, PO, Friedman, C 2002Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reportsRadiology224157163PubMed
9.
go back to reference Langlotz, CP 2002Automatic structuring of radiology reports: Harbinger of a second information revolution in radiologyRadiology22457PubMed Langlotz, CP 2002Automatic structuring of radiology reports: Harbinger of a second information revolution in radiologyRadiology22457PubMed
10.
go back to reference Naik, SS, Hanbidge, A, Wilson, SR 2001Radiology reports: Examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and contentAJR176591598PubMed Naik, SS, Hanbidge, A, Wilson, SR 2001Radiology reports: Examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and contentAJR176591598PubMed
11.
go back to reference Noumeir R: Radiology interpretation process modeling. J Biomed Inf 39(2):103–114, April 2006CrossRef Noumeir R: Radiology interpretation process modeling. J Biomed Inf 39(2):103–114, April 2006CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Noumeir R, Lemay A, Lina JM: Pseudonymisation of radiology data for research purposes. J Digit Imaging (in press) Noumeir R, Lemay A, Lina JM: Pseudonymisation of radiology data for research purposes. J Digit Imaging (in press)
13.
go back to reference Supplement 104: DICOM Encapsulation of PDF Documents, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), March 2005 Supplement 104: DICOM Encapsulation of PDF Documents, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), March 2005
14.
15.
go back to reference Carr, CD, Moore, SM 2003IHE: A model for driving adoption of standardsComput Med Imaging Graph27137146March/JuneCrossRefPubMed Carr, CD, Moore, SM 2003IHE: A model for driving adoption of standardsComput Med Imaging Graph27137146March/JuneCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Benefits of the DICOM Structured Report
Author
Rita Noumeir
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0631-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Journal of Digital Imaging 4/2006 Go to the issue