Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 5/2013

Open Access 01-10-2013 | Pictorial Review

Electronic collimation and radiation protection in paediatric digital radiography: revival of the silver lining

Authors: J. Bomer, L. Wiersma-Deijl, H. C. Holscher

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

In digital radiography we are now able to electronically collimate images after acquisition. This may seem convenient in paediatric imaging, but we have to be aware that electronic collimation has two major downsides. Electronic collimation implicates that the original field size should have been smaller and the child has been exposed to unnecessary radiation. Also, by use of electronic collimation, potentially important information may be lost. The “silver lining”, denoting the X-ray beam collimation, can serve as a useful radiation protection instrument to check for proper field size and detect unnecessary exposure. Furthermore, the silver lining confirms all exposed anatomy is shown in the final image, and thus may also serve as a quality assurance instrument as the patient has the right to all acquired information.
Teaching Points
The ability to electronically collimate an image after acquisition may serve to enhance contrast in the region of interest.
The ability to electronically collimate an image after acquisition carries the risk of overexposure.
The ability to electronically collimate an image after acquisition carries the risk of losing important information.
The silver lining can serve as a quality control instrument for proper collimation.
The patient has the right to all information obtained during an X-ray examination.
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2011) White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2:357–362CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2011) White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2:357–362CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Don S (2011) Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion. Pediatr Radiol 41:567–572PubMedCrossRef Don S (2011) Pediatric digital radiography summit overview: state of confusion. Pediatr Radiol 41:567–572PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, pp 267–312, Retrieved from: www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11340 Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, pp 267–312, Retrieved from: www.​nap.​edu/​catalog.​php?​record_​id=​11340
5.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Herrmann TL, Fauber TL, Gill J et al (2012) Best practices in digital radiography. American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Albuquerque Herrmann TL, Fauber TL, Gill J et al (2012) Best practices in digital radiography. American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Albuquerque
7.
go back to reference de Ru VJ, Scheurleer JS, Welleweerd J (2006) Radiobiologie en Stralingsbescherming, 5th edn. Elsevier, Maarssen, pp 211–212 de Ru VJ, Scheurleer JS, Welleweerd J (2006) Radiobiologie en Stralingsbescherming, 5th edn. Elsevier, Maarssen, pp 211–212
8.
go back to reference McNitt-Gray MF, Eldredge SL, Tagawa J, Huang HK (1992) Automic removal of unexposed background in digital radiographs. Proc SPIE 1653:451–457 McNitt-Gray MF, Eldredge SL, Tagawa J, Huang HK (1992) Automic removal of unexposed background in digital radiographs. Proc SPIE 1653:451–457
9.
go back to reference Morrison G, John SD, Goske MJ et al (2011) Pediatric digital radiography education for radiologic technologists: current state. Pediatr Radiol 41:602–610PubMedCrossRef Morrison G, John SD, Goske MJ et al (2011) Pediatric digital radiography education for radiologic technologists: current state. Pediatr Radiol 41:602–610PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Electronic collimation and radiation protection in paediatric digital radiography: revival of the silver lining
Authors
J. Bomer
L. Wiersma-Deijl
H. C. Holscher
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 5/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0281-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Insights into Imaging 5/2013 Go to the issue