Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 4/2011

Open Access 01-08-2011 | Statement

White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

In the past decade, the medical effective dose per caput has increased in most European countries because of CT; it now ranges between 0.4 and 2 mSv/year. The biological impact of diagnostic imaging exposure is dominated by stochastic effects: based on the linear-no-threshold hypothesis, the risk of cancer induction is estimated to increase proportionally to organ dose, reaching around 0.5% at an effective dose of 100 mSv. The risk is higher the younger the age at the time of exposure, it is different for different organs, and women are more susceptible than men. Fluoroscopy-based imaging, above all intervention, may reach the dose threshold for deterministic effects, observed most often at the skin above around 3 Gy, and it is also the major source of occupational exposure in radiology. This white paper discusses the role of justification, evidence-based referral guidelines, optimization, diagnostic reference levels, clinical audits and quality assurance programs. The ESR strongly supports education and training of the medical staff involved in imaging by ionizing radiation. It disseminates information regarding radiation protection, takes initiatives, cooperates with partners and supports projects in justification as well as optimization. To reach these aims, the ESR cooperates with other organizations involved in radiation protection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 105. 2007. Radiological Protection in Medicine. Ann. ICRP 37(6) International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP Publication 105. 2007. Radiological Protection in Medicine. Ann. ICRP 37(6)
2.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2011) European commission guidelines for clinical audit: statement by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2:97–98CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2011) European commission guidelines for clinical audit: statement by the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2:97–98CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R et al (2003) Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol 13:2259–2263PubMedCrossRef Neofotistou V, Vano E, Padovani R et al (2003) Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology. Eur Radiol 13:2259–2263PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marshall NW, Chapple CL, Kotre CJ (2000) Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology. Phys Med Biol 45:3833–3846PubMedCrossRef Marshall NW, Chapple CL, Kotre CJ (2000) Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology. Phys Med Biol 45:3833–3846PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
White paper on radiation protection by the European Society of Radiology
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 4/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0108-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Insights into Imaging 4/2011 Go to the issue