Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Sectio Ceasarea | Review Article

Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?

Author: Kalpana Mahadik

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Doubling of C-section rates from year 2000 to 2015 globally was declared an eye-opener on October 13, 2018, in FIGO World Congress. Rapid increase in rates without clear evidence of concomitant decrease in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. This review addresses issues related to exponentially rising rates, reasons for it, and strategies to reduce. Previous cesarean delivery has main contribution to rising rates as per evidence from the literature search in last 5 years. Focus on optimizing indications of primary C-section resulted in making us rethink modifiable indications like labor dystocia, indeterminate fetal heart rate tracing, suspected fetal macrosomia, malposition, risk-adapted obstetrics, litigation fears, on demand cesarean in literate women and overuse of labor induction. Use of uniform classification system (Robson/WHO classification) with recommendations of WHO, FIGO and annual audits with cloud-based anonymous registry will streamline decisions for cesarean in nullipara and help to control the situation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boema T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341.CrossRef Boema T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Caesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Caesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2015. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2015.
4.
go back to reference Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36e1–5.CrossRef Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36e1–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Editorial. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1279.CrossRef Editorial. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1279.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
7.
go back to reference Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.CrossRef Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of cesarean section births in private sector health facilities- analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farine D, Shepherd D. Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: the modified Robson Criteria. A Comm Opin Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):976–9.CrossRef Farine D, Shepherd D. Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: the modified Robson Criteria. A Comm Opin Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):976–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modified Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5038–43.CrossRef Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modified Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:5038–43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Voge JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis on behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Lancet. 2015;3(5):e260–70. Voge JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis on behalf of the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health Research Network. Lancet. 2015;3(5):e260–70.
18.
go back to reference Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, et al. A global reference for caesarean section rates (:c-model) a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, et al. A global reference for caesarean section rates (:c-model) a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low- risk planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.CrossRef Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low- risk planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rajbhandary S, Shrivastava VR. Study of Indications and post-operative complications of primary caesarean section in tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):835–40.CrossRef Rajbhandary S, Shrivastava VR. Study of Indications and post-operative complications of primary caesarean section in tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):835–40.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bhowmik J, Kyal A, Das I, et al. Pregnancy with previous caesarean section: an overview of adverse of fetomaternal sequelae. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(5):1817–21.CrossRef Bhowmik J, Kyal A, Das I, et al. Pregnancy with previous caesarean section: an overview of adverse of fetomaternal sequelae. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(5):1817–21.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, et al. Safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;201(3):179–93.CrossRef Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise J-M, et al. Safe prevention of the primary caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;201(3):179–93.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zhang J, Landy H, Branch W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.CrossRef Zhang J, Landy H, Branch W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom K, et al. Preventing the first Cesarean delivery; summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development, Society For Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College Of Obstetrician And Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom K, et al. Preventing the first Cesarean delivery; summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development, Society For Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College Of Obstetrician And Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Nelson K, Sartwelle T, Rouse D. Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesareans: assumptions versus evidence. BMJ. 2016;355:16405. Nelson K, Sartwelle T, Rouse D. Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesareans: assumptions versus evidence. BMJ. 2016;355:16405.
26.
go back to reference Obstetric Care Consensus ACOG number 1, March 2014. Obstetric Care Consensus ACOG number 1, March 2014.
27.
go back to reference Wiklund I, Malata M, Cheung NF, Cadee F. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018;392:1288–9.CrossRef Wiklund I, Malata M, Cheung NF, Cadee F. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018;392:1288–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rising Cesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?
Author
Kalpana Mahadik
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2019 Go to the issue