Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2019

01-10-2019 | Original Article

The Impact of Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Systems on Histopathologic Analysis for Benign and Cancerous Endometrial Pathology: An Ex Vivo Study

Authors: Steven R. Lindheim, Kimberly Lincenberg, Michelle A. Wood, Emily Kemner, Megan K. Burns, Daniel L. Hood, Rose Maxwell, Miryoung Lee

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of hysteroscopic tissue removal systems (TRS) on histopathology tissue diagnosis.

Measurements and Methods

This is a paired-comparison ex vivo study in which 23 endometrial sections from hysterectomized uteri (13 benign and 10 hyperplasia/cancer) were analyzed in a simulation laboratory center at a university teaching hospital. After routine tissue processing, a section of endometrium was provided for ex vivo TRS with suture mounting to a uterine model (Polly, Remedy). Morcellated specimens using the Hologic® MyoSure hysteroscopic device were processed for histopathologic analysis by two blinded pathologists (Pa and Pb) and compared to the original specimens’ tissue diagnoses.

Results

Sufficient tissue for evaluation was found in 100% (23/23) of TRS specimens by Pa and 91.3% by Pb. TRS specimen diagnoses were concordant with routine histologic diagnosis 86.9% (20/23, k = 0.76) for Pa and 80.9% (17/21, k = 0.68) for Pb. Sensitivity and specificity were 70%/100% for Pa and 80%/91% for Pb, respectively. The false-positive (overdiagnosed) and false-negative rates (underdiagnosed) were 0%/30% and 9%/20% for Pa and Pb. Both Pa and Pb underdiagnosed most specimens confirmed by routine tissue diagnosis. TRS specimen diagnoses between Pa and Pb were concordant in 76.2% (16/21, k = 0.60).

Conclusion

TRS may adversely impact the ability to provide a histologic tissue analysis. Up to 30% of samples were overdiagnosed and 20% underdiagnosed. If confirmed, pathologists may need to reassess workflows to better offset potential underdiagnosis of malignant specimens as findings may be obscured through TRS. Additionally, surgeons may need to reconsider specimen handling, so highest yield specimens are provided to pathology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Singh S, Best C, Dunn S, et al. No 292-abnormal uterine bleeding in pre-menopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:e391–415.CrossRef Singh S, Best C, Dunn S, et al. No 292-abnormal uterine bleeding in pre-menopausal women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:e391–415.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):992–1002.CrossRef Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):992–1002.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chang CY, Chang YT, Chien SC, et al. Factors associated with operative hysteroscopy outcome in patients with uterine adhesions or submucosal myomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(2):125–7.CrossRef Chang CY, Chang YT, Chien SC, et al. Factors associated with operative hysteroscopy outcome in patients with uterine adhesions or submucosal myomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(2):125–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garuti G, Luerti M. Hysteroscopic bipolar surgery: a valuable progress or a technique under investigation? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(4):329–34.CrossRef Garuti G, Luerti M. Hysteroscopic bipolar surgery: a valuable progress or a technique under investigation? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(4):329–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bergeron ME, Beaudet C, Bujold E, et al. Glycine absorption in operative hysteroscopy: the impact of anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):331.e1–5.CrossRef Bergeron ME, Beaudet C, Bujold E, et al. Glycine absorption in operative hysteroscopy: the impact of anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):331.e1–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology no. 13: hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e151–6.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology no. 13: hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:e151–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Dongen H, Emanuel MH, Wolterbeek R, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(4):466–71.CrossRef van Dongen H, Emanuel MH, Wolterbeek R, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(4):466–71.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamerlynck TW, Dietz V, Schoot BC. Clinical implementation of the hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine myomas and polyps. A retrospective descriptive study. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8(2):193–6.CrossRef Hamerlynck TW, Dietz V, Schoot BC. Clinical implementation of the hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine myomas and polyps. A retrospective descriptive study. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8(2):193–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Smith PP, Middleton LJ, Connor M, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation compared with electrical resection of endometrial polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):745–51.CrossRef Smith PP, Middleton LJ, Connor M, et al. Hysteroscopic morcellation compared with electrical resection of endometrial polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):745–51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference AlHilli MM, Nixon KE, Hopkins MR, et al. Long-term outcomes after intrauterine morcellation vs hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):215–21.CrossRef AlHilli MM, Nixon KE, Hopkins MR, et al. Long-term outcomes after intrauterine morcellation vs hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):215–21.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Meulenbroeks D, Hamerlynck TW, Saglam-Kara S, et al. Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems: a randomized in vitro comparison. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):159–64.CrossRef Meulenbroeks D, Hamerlynck TW, Saglam-Kara S, et al. Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems: a randomized in vitro comparison. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(1):159–64.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Systems on Histopathologic Analysis for Benign and Cancerous Endometrial Pathology: An Ex Vivo Study
Authors
Steven R. Lindheim
Kimberly Lincenberg
Michelle A. Wood
Emily Kemner
Megan K. Burns
Daniel L. Hood
Rose Maxwell
Miryoung Lee
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1177-6

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2019

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2019 Go to the issue