Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2016

01-12-2016 | Case Report

Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication

Author: Sujnanendra Mishra

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Unmet need for spacing as well as limiting methods of contraception is quite high in developing countries. The reasons for non-use of contraception are many, including lack of awareness, non-availability of accessible family planning services, and limitations on women’s mobility due mostly to cultural or geographical factors. During postpartum period no woman would like to be pregnant again. Delivery in an institution offers a unique opportunity to avail their need for contraception. PPIUCD allows women to obtain safe, long-acting, highly effective contraception with little discomfort and fewer side effects that to while within the facility. The popularity of the intrauterine device (IUD) and its use in the immediate postpartum period in countries like China, Egypt, and Mexico and now in India reflects safety and efficacy of this approach. Complications of immediate and intra-cesarean insertion of IUCD such as infection, bleeding, and pain are minimal, expulsion rate is little high, but overall continuation rate is encouraging. Use of interval intrauterine contraception can rarely result in uterine perforation. Perforation most often occurs during insertion, but might not be detected until sometime later. Perforation with PPIUCD was not reported till recent times. We report a case of removal of postplacental intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) translocated into the peritoneal cavity. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003;8:122–5.CrossRef Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, et al. Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003;8:122–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception. 1991;43:77–81.CrossRef Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception. 1991;43:77–81.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barsaul M, Sharma N, Sangwan K. 324 cases of misplaced IUCD—a 5 year study. Trop Doct. 2003;33:11–2.CrossRef Barsaul M, Sharma N, Sangwan K. 324 cases of misplaced IUCD—a 5 year study. Trop Doct. 2003;33:11–2.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mittal S, Kumar S, Roy KK. Role of endoscopy in retrieval of misplaced intrauterine device. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:49–51.CrossRef Mittal S, Kumar S, Roy KK. Role of endoscopy in retrieval of misplaced intrauterine device. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:49–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Aruna Subha Shree Rao Y, Aruna S, Sarada Bai K. A case report of a perforated postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device and review of literature. Int J Sci Study. 2015;3(2). Aruna Subha Shree Rao Y, Aruna S, Sarada Bai K. A case report of a perforated postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device and review of literature. Int J Sci Study. 2015;3(2).
6.
go back to reference Gupta V, Kumari N, Goswami D, et al. A rare case of perforation following PPIUCD insertion. JOGI available online. Gupta V, Kumari N, Goswami D, et al. A rare case of perforation following PPIUCD insertion. JOGI available online.
7.
go back to reference Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2006;73(3):257–60.CrossRef Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van Grootheest AC, et al. Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2006;73(3):257–60.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Turok DK, Gurtcheff SE, Gibson K, et al. Operative management of intrauterine device complications: a case series report. Contraception. 2010;82(4):354–7.CrossRef Turok DK, Gurtcheff SE, Gibson K, et al. Operative management of intrauterine device complications: a case series report. Contraception. 2010;82(4):354–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Basil H, Irvin M. Gastroenterological endoscopy, vol 1, 1st edn. In: Classen MTytgat GLightdale CH, editor. Thiemme Stutgart; 2002. p. 2–16. Basil H, Irvin M. Gastroenterological endoscopy, vol 1, 1st edn. In: Classen MTytgat GLightdale CH, editor. Thiemme Stutgart; 2002. p. 2–16.
10.
go back to reference Acosta Bendek E. Removal from the abdominal cavity of an intrauterine device by culdoscopy. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 1977;28:85–8.PubMed Acosta Bendek E. Removal from the abdominal cavity of an intrauterine device by culdoscopy. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 1977;28:85–8.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Valle RF, Sciarra JJ, Freeman DW. Hysterocsopic removal of intrauterine devices with missing filaments. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:55–60.PubMed Valle RF, Sciarra JJ, Freeman DW. Hysterocsopic removal of intrauterine devices with missing filaments. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:55–60.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mittal S, Gupta I, Lata P, et al. Management of translocated and incarcerated intrauterine contraceptive devices. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;26:232–4.CrossRef Mittal S, Gupta I, Lata P, et al. Management of translocated and incarcerated intrauterine contraceptive devices. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;26:232–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication
Author
Sujnanendra Mishra
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0886-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2016 Go to the issue