Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Editorial

Social Egg Freezing: Developing Countries Are Not Exempt

Author: Gautam N. Allahbadia

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Non-medical egg freezing has only been available for about the last 5 years, as new vitrification techniques have made the success rates for actual conception more reliable than the earlier method of slow freezing. The improved outcomes of new technologies of vitrification and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) have led to the marketing of egg freezing for non-medical reasons, whereby women are offered the possibility of preserving their eggs until such time as they wish to have a child. For many women today, it is not cancer but the simple passage of time that robs them of their chance of motherhood. Social, educational, emotional and financial pressures often lead them to delay trying to start a family until their late thirties, by which time the chance of success is very low. Women at age 40 face a 40 % chance of miscarriage if they can get pregnant at all, and by the age of 45, the risk of miscarriage is 75 %. Donor eggs are not an option for many because of supply constraints and ethical and cultural concerns. Freezing a woman’s eggs at age 30 literally “freezes in time” her fertility potential and gives her the chance of a healthy pregnancy at a time of her choosing. Despite the initial reactions of disapproval, more and more fertility clinics are now offering oocyte cryopreservation to healthy women in order to extend their reproductive options. This procedure is now becoming popular even in developing economies, and egg freezing in major Indian Metros is now routine.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Tsafrir A, Haimov-Kochman R, Margalioth EJ, et al. Ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation for prevention of age-related fertility loss: one in five is a low responder. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;18:1–4. Tsafrir A, Haimov-Kochman R, Margalioth EJ, et al. Ovarian stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation for prevention of age-related fertility loss: one in five is a low responder. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;18:1–4.
4.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Clinical aspects and perinatal outcomes after cryopreservation of embryos and gametes. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67(2):207–15.PubMed Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Clinical aspects and perinatal outcomes after cryopreservation of embryos and gametes. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67(2):207–15.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):655–61. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq367.CrossRefPubMed Stoop D, Nekkebroeck J, Devroey P. A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):655–61. doi:10.​1093/​humrep/​deq367.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Social Egg Freezing: Developing Countries Are Not Exempt
Author
Gautam N. Allahbadia
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0803-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2016 Go to the issue