Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy

Authors: Sandhyasri Panda, Ashok Kumar Behera, M. Jayalakshmi, T. Narasinga Rao, G. Indira

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical results of three techniques of hysterectomy- abdominal hysterectomy (AH), non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH), and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).

Methods

A simple prospective randomized study was performed in a tertiary care centre between June 2011 and Dec 2012, among 150 consecutive women indicated to undergo hysterectomy for benign and mobile uterine conditions. They were randomly assigned 50 each to three routes of hysterectomy; (abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal). Outcome measures including operating time, blood loss, rate of complications, consumption of analgesics, and length of hospital stay were assessed and compared between groups.

Results

As far as duration of operation, mean blood loss, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, P value was significant. Incidence of complications is least among VH group.

Conclusion

Vaginal hysterectomy is the gold standard in the era of minimal access surgery. Some of the contraindications to VH can be overcome by assistance of laparoscope and a potential abdominal hysterectomy can be converted to a vaginal procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clinch J. Length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(3):253–4.PubMedCrossRef Clinch J. Length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(3):253–4.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reich H., De Caprio J., McGlynn F., 1989. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J. Gynecolo Surg, 5:213-216 Volume 335:512-513 August 15, 1996 Number 7. Reich H., De Caprio J., McGlynn F., 1989. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J. Gynecolo Surg, 5:213-216 Volume 335:512-513 August 15, 1996 Number 7.
3.
go back to reference Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:841–8.PubMed Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:841–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129–33. Epub 2004 Jan 7.[PMC free article] [PubMed]. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129–33. Epub 2004 Jan 7.[PMC free article] [PubMed].
5.
go back to reference Kovac SR. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:159–69.PubMedCrossRef Kovac SR. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71:159–69.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M et al. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1521–7.PubMedCrossRef Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M et al. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1521–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Openion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105: 929-30. ACOG Committee Openion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105: 929-30.
8.
go back to reference Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M. Complication and recovery for laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:304–11.PubMedCrossRef Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M. Complication and recovery for laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:304–11.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107(11):1386–91.CrossRef Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107(11):1386–91.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Price JH, Nassief SA. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: initial experience. Ulster Med J.1996;65(2):149–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]. Price JH, Nassief SA. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: initial experience. Ulster Med J.1996;65(2):149–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed].
11.
go back to reference Campbell ES, Xiao H, Smith MK. Types of hysterectomy: comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(12):943–9.PubMed Campbell ES, Xiao H, Smith MK. Types of hysterectomy: comparison of characteristics, hospital costs, utilization and outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(12):943–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Garry R. The best way to determine the best way to undertake a hysterectomy (commentary). BJOG. 2009;116:473–7.PubMedCrossRef Garry R. The best way to determine the best way to undertake a hysterectomy (commentary). BJOG. 2009;116:473–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy
Authors
Sandhyasri Panda
Ashok Kumar Behera
M. Jayalakshmi
T. Narasinga Rao
G. Indira
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0562-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2015 Go to the issue