Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2021

01-12-2021 | Neck Dissection | Original Article

Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer

Authors: Mohamed Abdul Kathar, Prateek Jain, Kapila Manikantan, Pattatheyil Arun, Yoon Woo Koh, Rajeev Sharan

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common in India. There is an increasing incidence of oral cancer in young patients. Where the primary lesion is amenable to transoral resection for early cancer, young patients are concerned about cosmesis and would prefer a surgical approach that would avoid a visible scar in the neck. Robot/endoscope–assisted neck dissection by retroauricular approach was performed in a total of 28 patients of cN0 patients between June 2016 and December 2019. The duration of surgery, perioperative complications, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed. Robot- and endoscope-assisted neck dissections were done in 15 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 46.18 ± 9.68 years. Twenty-four patients had tongue cancer. Mean time for skin flap raising, docking, and robotic console use was 48.21 ± 7.48 min, 10 ± 3.16 min, and 176.67 ± 47.27 min, respectively. Mean neck dissection time from skin incision to skin closure was 231.79 ± 54.94 min for completing level I to IV neck dissection. The mean number of retrieved nodes was 33.69 ± 12.81. Majority of the patients were highly satisfied with their cosmetic outcomes. During a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 3 patients developed recurrence. Robot/ endoscope–assisted neck dissection was feasible and safe but took a longer time to perform. Nodal yields were adequate and better cosmetic outcomes were achieved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jou A, Hess J (2017) Epidemiology and molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Oncol Res Treat 40(6):328–332CrossRef Jou A, Hess J (2017) Epidemiology and molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Oncol Res Treat 40(6):328–332CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bulbul MG, Zenga J, Puram SV, Tarabichi O, Parikh AS, Varvares MA (2019) Understanding approaches to measurement and impact of depth of invasion of oral cavity cancers: a survey of American Head and Neck Society Membership. Oral Oncology 99:104461CrossRef Bulbul MG, Zenga J, Puram SV, Tarabichi O, Parikh AS, Varvares MA (2019) Understanding approaches to measurement and impact of depth of invasion of oral cavity cancers: a survey of American Head and Neck Society Membership. Oral Oncology 99:104461CrossRef
3.
go back to reference D’Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N et al (2015) Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med 373(6):521–529CrossRef D’Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N et al (2015) Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med 373(6):521–529CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim Y-J, Kim JH (2020) Increasing incidence and improving survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 10(1):7877CrossRef Kim Y-J, Kim JH (2020) Increasing incidence and improving survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 10(1):7877CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tota JE, Anderson WF, Coffey C et al (2017) Rising incidence of oral tongue cancer among white men and women in the United States, 1973–2012. Oral Oncol 67:146–152CrossRef Tota JE, Anderson WF, Coffey C et al (2017) Rising incidence of oral tongue cancer among white men and women in the United States, 1973–2012. Oral Oncol 67:146–152CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW (2011) Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: patient selection and technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21(4):237–242CrossRef Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW (2011) Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: patient selection and technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21(4):237–242CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee H, Kim W, Hong HJ et al (2012) Robot-assisted Supraomohyoid neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach in early-stage cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a comparative study with conventional technique. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3871–3878CrossRef Lee H, Kim W, Hong HJ et al (2012) Robot-assisted Supraomohyoid neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach in early-stage cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a comparative study with conventional technique. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3871–3878CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Arora A, Swords C, Garas G et al (2016) The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 25:38–43CrossRef Arora A, Swords C, Garas G et al (2016) The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 25:38–43CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kang S-W, Lee SH, Ryu HR et al (2010) Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surgery 148(6):1214–1221CrossRef Kang S-W, Lee SH, Ryu HR et al (2010) Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surgery 148(6):1214–1221CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim WS, Byeon HK, Park YM et al (2015) Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: a comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection. Head Neck 37(2):249–254CrossRef Kim WS, Byeon HK, Park YM et al (2015) Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: a comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection. Head Neck 37(2):249–254CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee J, Chung WY (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J 19(2):151–161CrossRef Lee J, Chung WY (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J 19(2):151–161CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20(12):1327–1332CrossRef Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20(12):1327–1332CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sukato DC, Ballard DP, Abramowitz JM, Rosenfeld RM, Mlot S (2019) Robotic versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis: robotic versus open neck dissection. Laryngoscope 129(7):1587–1596CrossRef Sukato DC, Ballard DP, Abramowitz JM, Rosenfeld RM, Mlot S (2019) Robotic versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis: robotic versus open neck dissection. Laryngoscope 129(7):1587–1596CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ji YB, Song CM, Bang HS, Park HJ, Lee JY, Tae K (2017) Functional and cosmetic outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 70:51–57CrossRef Ji YB, Song CM, Bang HS, Park HJ, Lee JY, Tae K (2017) Functional and cosmetic outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 70:51–57CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Divi V, Chen MM, Nussenbaum B et al (2016) Lymph node count from neck dissection predicts mortality in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(32):3892–3897CrossRef Divi V, Chen MM, Nussenbaum B et al (2016) Lymph node count from neck dissection predicts mortality in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(32):3892–3897CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Graboyes EM, Gross J, Kallogjeri D et al (2016) Association of compliance with process-related quality metrics and improved survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(5):430–437CrossRef Graboyes EM, Gross J, Kallogjeri D et al (2016) Association of compliance with process-related quality metrics and improved survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142(5):430–437CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ebrahimi A, Clark JR, Amit M et al (2014) Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study. Ann Surg Oncol 21(9):3049–3055CrossRef Ebrahimi A, Clark JR, Amit M et al (2014) Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma: defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study. Ann Surg Oncol 21(9):3049–3055CrossRef
20.
go back to reference de Kort WWB, Maas SLN, Van Es RJJ, Willems SM (2019) Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Head Neck 41(8):2801–2810CrossRef de Kort WWB, Maas SLN, Van Es RJJ, Willems SM (2019) Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Head Neck 41(8):2801–2810CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer
Authors
Mohamed Abdul Kathar
Prateek Jain
Kapila Manikantan
Pattatheyil Arun
Yoon Woo Koh
Rajeev Sharan
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Electronic ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-021-01444-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2021 Go to the issue